Is the connectivity function a good indicator of soil infiltrability distribution and runoff flow dimension?

Among the studies on runoff connectivity of soils with heterogeneous properties, the need to understand the relationships between soil heterogeneity and the associated runoff organization and amount is frequently mentioned. In this study, we simulate the stationary runoff–runon process on bi-dimensional (2D) flat slopes for five infiltrability distributions, one of them correlated, as a function of rainfall intensity and flow dimension. We define flow dimension by 1 + e, where e is the outflow fraction transferred from one pixel to each of the two lateral downslope pixels. Our aim is to assess the effect of e and soil heterogeneity on the connectivity function compared to the mean runoff flow rate, the wet area and the number of runoff patterns. The analysis of connectivity is carried within the percolation framework. The results show that the integral connectivity scale is more sensitive to the flow dimension and soil heterogeneity compared to the other variables. The wet area fraction does not depend on e. Unlike previous studies, we find that increased runoff production is not necessarily related to increased connectivity. The use of the connectivity function within the percolation framework appears to be a valuable method for assessing the impact of soil heterogeneity and flow dimension on the runoff organization during a rainfall event. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Connectivity at the hillslope scale: identifying interactions between storm size, bedrock permeability, slope angle and soil depth. , 2009 .

[2]  André G. Roy,et al.  Shopping for hydrologically representative connectivity metrics in a humid temperate forested catchment , 2010 .

[3]  Jesús Carrera,et al.  On the relationship between indicators of geostatistical, flow and transport connectivity , 2005 .

[4]  Bofu Yu,et al.  Plot-scale rainfall-runoff characteristics and modeling at six sites in Australia and Southeast Asia , 1997 .

[5]  A. Parsons,et al.  Impact of connectivity on the modeling of overland flow within semiarid shrubland environments , 2007 .

[6]  M. Harel,et al.  1‐D steady state runoff production in light of queuing theory: Heterogeneity, connectivity, and scale , 2013 .

[7]  Katerina Michaelides,et al.  Connectivity as a concept for characterising hydrological behaviour , 2009 .

[8]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  Concepts of hydrological connectivity: Research approaches, pathways and future agendas , 2013 .

[9]  R. M. Roberts,et al.  Flow dimensions corresponding to hydrogeologic conditions , 2003 .

[10]  J. Barker.  A generalized radial flow model for hydraulic tests in fractured rock , 1988 .

[11]  I. Jensen.  Enumerations of Lattice Animals and Trees , 2000, cond-mat/0007239.

[12]  Yuichi Onda,et al.  Dynamic runoff connectivity of overland flow on steep forested hillslopes: Scale effects and runoff transfer , 2008 .

[13]  D. A. Woolhiser,et al.  Effects of Spatial Variability of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity on Hortonian Overland Flow , 1996 .

[14]  Pierre Y. Julien,et al.  Similarity in Catchment Response: 1. Stationary Rainstorms , 1995 .

[15]  Denis Allard.  On the Connectivity of Two Random Set Models: The Truncated Gaussian and the Boolean , 1993 .

[16]  J. Stone,et al.  Rainfall Intensity-Dependent Infiltration Rates on Rangeland Rainfall Simulator Plots , 2008 .

[17]  Joey N. Shaw,et al.  Spatial–temporal variability and hydrologic connectivity of runoff generation areas in a North Alabama pasture—implications for phosphorus transport , 2010 .

[18]  A. van Dijk,et al.  Runoff and soil loss from bench terraces. 1. An event‐based model of rainfall infiltration and surface runoff , 2004 .

[19]  Rao S. Govindaraju,et al.  A field‐scale infiltration model accounting for spatial heterogeneity of rainfall and soil saturated hydraulic conductivity , 2006 .

[20]  L. Bracken,et al.  The importance of surface controls on overland flow connectivity in semi‐arid environments: results from a numerical experimental approach , 2014 .

[21]  L. H. Cammeraat,et al.  Scale dependent tresholds in hydrological and erosion response of a semi-arid catchment in Southeast Spain , 2004 .

[22]  F. Melone,et al.  On the interaction between infiltration and Hortonian runoff , 1998 .

[23]  R. H. Hawkins,et al.  STEADY‐STATE ANALYSIS OF INFILTRATION AND OVERLAND FLOW FOR SPATIALLY‐VARIED HILLSLOPES , 1987 .

[24]  Rao S. Govindaraju,et al.  Role of run-on for describing field-scale infiltration and overland flow over spatially variable soils , 2004 .

[25]  R. Grayson,et al.  Toward capturing hydrologically significant connectivity in spatial patterns , 2001 .

[26]  Matthew D. Wilson,et al.  Uncertainty in predicted runoff due to patterns of spatially variable infiltration , 2007 .

[27]  R. Govindaraju,et al.  A semi-analytical model of expected areal-average infiltration under spatial heterogeneity of rainfall and soil saturated hydraulic conductivity , 2006 .

[28]  Rao S. Govindaraju,et al.  A simplified model for estimating field-scale surface runoff hydrographs , 2007 .

[29]  J. Wainwright,et al.  Linking environmental régimes, space and time: Interpretations of structural and functional connectivity , 2008 .

[30]  Mathieu Javaux,et al.  What indicators can capture runoff-relevant connectivity properties of the micro-topography at the plot scale? , 2009 .

[31]  C. Valentin,et al.  Analysis of runoff production at the plot scale during a long-term survey of a small agricultural catchment in Lao PDR , 2012 .

[32]  Andrew W. Western,et al.  An analysis of the impact of spatial variability in rainfall on runoff and sediment predictions from a distributed model , 2012 .

[33]  Philippe Renard,et al.  Connectivity metrics for subsurface flow and transport , 2013 .

[34]  L. Pfister,et al.  A diffusive transport approach for flow routing in GIS-based flood modeling , 2003 .

[35]  Guido Wyseure,et al.  Pattern‐process relationships in surface hydrology: hydrological connectivity expressed in landscape metrics , 2011 .

[36]  A. D. Abrahams,et al.  Modeling runoff and runon in a desert shrubland ecosystem, Jornada Basin, New Mexico , 2003 .

[37]  Louise J. Bracken,et al.  The concept of hydrological connectivity and its contribution to understanding runoff‐dominated geomorphic systems , 2007 .