Measuring On-Farm Irrigation Efficiency with Chloride Tracing under Deficit Irrigation

Water is a limited resource in agricultural production in arid climates. Under such conditions, high irrigation efficiency can be obtained either through implementation of efficient irrigation systems such as drip or sprinkler systems or through the age-old practice of deficit irrigation with gravity systems. The method used to increase irrigation efficiency is often dictated by economic and/or social factors. In either case, the effectiveness of water management at the farm level needs to be evaluated by measuring irrigation efficiency. The objective of this study was to evaluate the irrigation efficiencies for three crops in Southern New Mexico using the chloride technique. The chloride technique is a simple method in which the natural chloride in the irrigation water is used as a tracer to estimate the leaching fraction and the irrigation efficiency at the farm level. Soil samples were collected from various fields in 15 cm increments to a depth of 180 cm at the end of the irrigation season. The samples were analyzed for moisture and chloride content. In addition to the chloride technique, on-farm irrigation efficiencies were measured using applied water, yield, and water production functions. Water production functions and yields were used to estimate total evapotranspiration while flow measurements were used to calculate the amount of applied water. The results showed that high irrigation efficiency can be accomplished using deficit irrigation. Irrigation efficiency values ranged from 83 to 98%. Irrigation efficiencies using the chloride technique were compared with efficiencies estimated from direct flow measurements. The differences between the two methods ranged from 2 to 11.4%. The results showed that even though the chloride technique is subject to sampling errors and simplified theoretical assumptions, it can be used to estimate on-farm irrigation efficiency with considerable accuracy.

[1]  A. Andres,et al.  Tracing nitrate transport and environmental impact from intensive swine farming using delta nitrogen-15. , 2001, Journal of environmental quality.

[2]  L. J. Lund,et al.  AN APPROACH TO MEASURING LEACHING OF NITRATE FROM FREELY DRAINED IRRIGATED FIELDS , 1978 .

[3]  T. Sinclair,et al.  Historical changes in harvest index and crop nitrogen accumulation , 1998 .

[4]  Marvin E. Jensen,et al.  Design and Operation of Farm Irrigation Systems , 1980 .

[5]  T. Sammis,et al.  Nitrogen and chloride concentration in deep soil cores related to fertilization , 1997 .

[6]  CRITIQUE - OF “AN APPROACH TO MEASURING LEACHING OF NITRATE FROM FREELY DRAINED IRRIGATED FIELDS”1 , 1978 .

[7]  P. Wierenga,et al.  Yield and quality of trickle-irrigated chile peppers , 1985 .

[8]  S. Miyamoto Consumptive Water Use of Irrigated Pecans , 1983, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science.

[9]  George H. Hargreaves,et al.  Economic Considerations of Deficit Irrigation , 1984 .

[10]  C. Pringle,et al.  Chemical tracing of interbasin groundwater transfer in the lowland rainforest of Costa Rica , 2002 .

[11]  T. Sammis Yield of Alfalfa and Cotton as Influenced by Irrigation1 , 1981 .

[12]  B. Stewart CRITIQUE – OF “AN APPROACH TO MEASURING LEACHING OF NITRATE FROM FREELY-DRAINED IRRIGATED FIELDS” , 1978 .

[13]  A. Vengosh,et al.  Chloride/Bromide and Chloride/Fluoride Ratios of Domestic Sewage Effluents and Associated Contaminated Ground Water , 1998 .