The Proteus Effect: The Effect of Transformed Self-Representation on Behavior

Virtual environments, such as online games and web-based chat rooms, increasingly allow us to alter our digital self-representations dramatically and easily. But as we change our self-representations, do our self-representations change our behavior in turn? In 2 experimental studies, we explore the hypothesis that an individual’s behavior conforms to their digital self-representation independent of how others perceive them—a process we term the Proteus Effect. In the first study, participants assigned to more attractive avatars in immersive virtual environments were more intimate with confederates in a self-disclosure and interpersonal distance task than participants assigned to less attractive avatars. In our second study, participants assigned taller avatars behaved more confidently in a negotiation task than participants assigned shorter avatars. We discuss the implications of the Proteus Effect with regards to social interactions in online environments.

[1]  M. Snyder On the Self-Fulfilling Nature of Social Stereotypes. , 1977 .

[2]  Lee Humphreys,et al.  Digital Media: Transformations in Human Communication , 2006 .

[3]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[4]  R. Friend,et al.  Leaning Over Backwards Jurors ‘Responses to Defendants’Attractiveness , 1974 .

[5]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[6]  P. Zimbardo The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. , 1969 .

[7]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  Immersive Virtual Environment Technology as a Methodological Tool for Social Psychology , 2002 .

[8]  T. Postmes,et al.  Behavior Online: Does Anonymous Computer Communication Reduce Gender Inequality? , 2002 .

[9]  J. Horowitz,et al.  Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments , 1994 .

[10]  J. Loomis,et al.  Interpersonal Distance in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[11]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[12]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective , 1987 .

[13]  A. Harrison,et al.  Let's make a deal: An analysis of revelations and stipulations in lonely hearts advertisements. , 1977 .

[14]  Malcolm R. Parks Making Friends in Cyberspace , 1996, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[15]  J. Burgoon A Communication Model of Personal Space Violations: Explication and an Initial Test. , 1978 .

[16]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Impression Formation in Computer-Mediated Communication Revisited , 2001, Commun. Res..

[17]  M. Frank,et al.  The dark side of self- and social perception: black uniforms and aggression in professional sports. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  E. Berscheid,et al.  What is beautiful is good. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  M. Turk,et al.  Transformed social interaction, augmented gaze, and social influence in immersive virtual environments , 2005 .

[20]  Nick Yee,et al.  The Demographics, Motivations, and Derived Experiences of Users of Massively Multi-User Online Graphical Environments , 2006, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[21]  David Jacobson,et al.  Impression Formation in Cyberspace: Online Expectations and Offline Experiences in Text-based Virtual Communities , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[22]  T. Postmes,et al.  The Formation of Group Norms in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2000 .

[23]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  The Proteus Effect , 2009, Commun. Res..

[24]  J. Loomis,et al.  Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[25]  Kenneth J. Gergen,et al.  Deviance In Dark , 1973 .

[26]  S. Valins Cognitive effects of false heart-rate feedback. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  L A French,et al.  Height and Perceived Competence of U.S. Presidents , 1996, Perceptual and motor skills.

[28]  J. Langlois,et al.  Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  S. Turkle Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet , 1997 .

[30]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Nonverbal Expectancies and the Evaluative Consequences of Violations , 1990 .

[31]  D. Bem Self-Perception Theory , 1972 .

[32]  S. R. Hiltz,et al.  Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. , 1986 .

[33]  R. Cairns On human sociobiology. , 1980 .

[34]  David W. Park,et al.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1994 .

[35]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Plan 9 From Cyberspace: The Implications of the Internet for Personality and Social Psychology , 2000 .

[36]  Steve Benford,et al.  The COVEN Project: Exploring Applicative, Technical, and Usage Dimensions of Collaborative Virtual Environments , 1999, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[37]  Andrew J. Flanagin,et al.  Computer-Mediated Group Work: The Interaction of Sex and Anonymity , 2002, Commun. Res..

[38]  R. Stogdill Personal factors associated with leadership; a survey of the literature. , 1948, The Journal of psychology.

[39]  L. Downing,et al.  Deindividuation and valence of cues: effects on prosocial and antisocial behavior. , 1979, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  J. Walther,et al.  Interpretations, Evaluations, and Consequences of Interpersonal Touch , 1992 .

[41]  T. Postmes,et al.  Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? , 1998 .

[42]  P. Dunham Impression Formation in Computer-Mediated Communication Revisited An Analysis of the Breadth and Intensity of Impressions , 2001 .