An Overview and Classification of Tolerance Compensation Methods

Technological advances as well as novel manufacturing and design paradigms, such as industry 4.0 and digitalization, offer new opportunities for innovative products. However, they also increase the product complexity and cause new challenges in the production process. Therefore, agile production approaches are crucial. Tolerance compensation provides more flexibility in the production process, as demands on dimensional accuracy of the components are reduced. As a result, tolerance compensation also offers the possibility of reducing production costs without compromising product quality. Nevertheless, tolerance compensation is often considered a reactive intervention to reduce the number of out-of-spec parts a posteriori instead of including it in the early stages of Geometrical Variations Management. The contribution tackles this issue by characterizing and categorizing different methods of tolerance compensation as well as providing design guidelines for the application of tolerance compensation methods. This enables design engineers to select a suitable tolerance compensation method for different applications.

[1]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Toward a Digital Twin for real-time geometry assurance in individualized production , 2017 .

[2]  Martin Ebro,et al.  Robust design principles for reducing variation in functional performance , 2016 .

[3]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Virtual Locator Trimming in Pre-Production-Rigid and Non-Rigid Analysis , 2005 .

[4]  Sven Matthiesen,et al.  Book of Abstracts. Symposium Lightweight Design in Product Development: Zurich, 14.06. – 15.06.2018 , 2018 .

[5]  Sandro Wartzack,et al.  How to determine the influence of geometric deviations on elastic deformations and the structural performance? , 2013 .

[6]  Sandro Wartzack,et al.  An Approach to the Sensitivity Analysis in Variation Simulations considering Form Deviations , 2018 .

[7]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Computer Aided Assembly Robustness Evaluation , 1999 .

[8]  E. M. Mansoor SELECTIVE ASSEMBLY — ITS ANALYSIS AND APPLICATIONS , 1961 .

[9]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Inspection Data to Support a Digital Twin for Geometry Assurance , 2017 .

[10]  Frank Henning,et al.  Handbuch Leichtbau: Methoden, Werkstoffe, Fertigung , 2011 .

[11]  Tullio Tolio,et al.  Integrated quality and production logistics modelling for the design of selective and adaptive assembly systems , 2014 .

[12]  Qinghua Zhu,et al.  Optional classification for reassembly methods with different precision remanufactured parts , 2014 .

[13]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Tolerance Chain Detection by Geometrical Constraint Based Coupling Analysis , 1999 .

[14]  Sandro Wartzack,et al.  Shaping the digital twin for design and production engineering , 2017 .

[15]  Sandro Wartzack,et al.  Geometrical Variations Management 4.0: towards next Generation Geometry Assurance , 2018 .

[16]  Sandro Wartzack,et al.  Status and Prospects of Skin Model Shapes for Geometric Variations Management , 2016 .

[17]  Benjamin Haefner,et al.  Optimization of selective assembly and adaptive manufacturing by means of cyber-physical system based matching , 2015 .

[18]  Richard J. Linn,et al.  A GROUPING METHOD FOR SELECTIVE ASSEMBLY OF PARTS OF DISSIMILAR DISTRIBUTIONS , 1998 .