The added value of SLN mapping with indocyanine green in low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer management: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective The aim of this study was to assess the SLN detection rate in presumed early stage, low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancers, the incidence of SLN metastases, and the negative predictive value of SLN mapping performed with indocyanine green (ICG). Methods A systematic review with meta-analyses was conducted. Study inclusion criteria were A) low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer, B) the use of ICG per cervical injection; C) a minimum of twenty included patients per study. To assess the negative predictive value of SLN mapping, D) a subsequent lymphadenectomy was an additional inclusion criterion. Results Fourteen studies were selected, involving 2,117 patients. The overall and bilateral SLN detection rates were 95.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]=92.4%–97.9%) and 76.5% (95% CI=68.1%–84.0%), respectively. The incidence of SLN metastases was 9.6% (95% CI=5.1%–15.2%) in patients with grade 1–2 endometrial cancer and 11.8% (95% CI=8.1%–16.1%) in patients with grade 1–3 endometrial cancer. The negative predictive value of SLN mapping was 100% (95% CI=98.8%–100%) in studies that included grade 1–2 endometrial cancer and 99.2% (95% CI=97.9%–99.9%) in studies that also included grade 3. Conclusion SLN mapping with ICG is feasible with a high detection rate and negative predictive value in low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancers. Given the incidence of SLN metastases is approximately 10% in those patients, SLN mapping may lead to stage shifting with potential therapeutic consequences. Given the high negative predictive value with SLN mapping, routine lymphadenectomy should be omitted in low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer.

[1]  Weiwei Shan,et al.  Efficacy of sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer with low‐ or high‐intermediate risk , 2021, Journal of surgical oncology.

[2]  M. Rovers,et al.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of three approaches for lymph node assessment in patients with low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer. , 2021, Gynecologic oncology.

[3]  B. Winkens,et al.  Lymphedema and Post-Operative Complications after Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy versus Lymphadenectomy in Endometrial Carcinomas—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2020, Journal of clinical medicine.

[4]  Cyrus Chargari,et al.  ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma , 2020, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[5]  G. Turashvili,et al.  Assessment of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy vs Lymphadenectomy for Intermediate- and High-Grade Endometrial Cancer Staging , 2020, JAMA surgery.

[6]  C. Faloppa,et al.  Impact of Sentinel Node Mapping in Decreasing the Risk of Lymphocele in Endometrial Cancer , 2020, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[7]  L. Mariani,et al.  Hysteroscopic versus cervical injection for sentinel node detection in endometrial cancer: A multicenter prospective randomised controlled trial from the Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian cancer (MITO) study group. , 2020, European journal of cancer.

[8]  G. Oprea,et al.  Prognostic significance of hormone receptor (ER/PR) status in endometrial carcinoma in black women: Implications with lymph node metastasis. , 2020 .

[9]  A. Dell'Acqua,et al.  Survival outcomes in endometrial cancer patients having lymphadenectomy, sentinel node mapping followed by lymphadectomy and sentinel node mapping alone: Long-term results of a propensity-matched analysis. , 2020, Gynecologic oncology.

[10]  P. Zusterzeel,et al.  Patients' and gynecologists' views on sentinel lymph node mapping in low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer: a Dutch vignette study , 2020, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[11]  A. E. Bailey,et al.  IGCS Intraoperative Technology Taskforce. Update on near infrared imaging technology: beyond white light and the naked eye, indocyanine green and near infrared technology in the treatment of gynecologic cancers , 2020, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[12]  R. Holloway,et al.  Robotic sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in endometrial cancer: SLN symmetry and implications of mapping failure , 2019, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[13]  N. Tokgozoglu,et al.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early stage endometrial cancer: a Turkish gynecologic oncology group study (TRSGO-SLN-001) , 2019, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[14]  H. Putter,et al.  Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): patterns of recurrence and post-hoc survival analysis of a randomised phase 3 trial , 2019, The Lancet. Oncology.

[15]  X. Wan,et al.  A Prospective Study of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Is It Effective in High-Risk Subtypes? , 2019, The oncologist.

[16]  W. E. Richards,et al.  Adjuvant Chemotherapy plus Radiation for Locally Advanced Endometrial Cancer. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  David W. Cohen,et al.  Prospective clinical trial of robotic sentinel lymph node assessment with isosulfane blue (ISB) and indocyanine green (ICG) in endometrial cancer and the impact of ultrastaging (NCT01818739). , 2019, Gynecologic oncology.

[18]  I. Nagtegaal,et al.  Accuracy of Endometrial Sampling in Endometrial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. , 2017, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  M. Carney,et al.  Low-Volume Lymph Node Metastases in Endometrial Carcinoma , 2017, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[20]  A. Fader,et al.  Sentinel lymph node assessment in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2017, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[21]  Vishnu Goutham Kota,et al.  Sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2017, Oncotarget.

[22]  A. Ivanova,et al.  A comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy to lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer staging (FIRES trial): a multicentre, prospective, cohort study. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[23]  Weiwei Shan,et al.  Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Endometrial Cancer Using Serum CA125 Combined with Immunohistochemical Markers PR and Ki67, and a Comparison with Other Prediction Models , 2016, PloS one.

[24]  J. Sehouli,et al.  Sentinel Node Mapping in Cervical and Endometrial Cancer: Indocyanine Green Versus Other Conventional Dyes—A Meta-Analysis , 2016, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[25]  Sarika Gupta,et al.  Sentinel lymph node mapping with staging lymphadenectomy for patients with endometrial cancer increases the detection of metastasis. , 2016, Gynecologic oncology.

[26]  M. Gasparri,et al.  Laparoscopic Indocyanine Green Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer , 2016, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[27]  E. De Ponti,et al.  Impact of Indocyanine Green for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Early Stage Endometrial and Cervical Cancer: Comparison with Conventional Radiotracer 99mTc and/or Blue Dye , 2015, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[28]  R. Rouzier,et al.  Staging for endometrial cancer: The controversy around lymphadenectomy - Can this be resolved? , 2015, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[29]  A. Weaver,et al.  Lymphedema After Surgery for Endometrial Cancer: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Quality of Life , 2014, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[30]  George F Borm,et al.  The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method , 2014, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[31]  J. Marcickiewicz,et al.  Hormone receptor loss in endometrial carcinoma curettage predicts lymph node metastasis and poor outcome in prospective multicentre trial. , 2013, European journal of cancer.

[32]  Kuan-Gen Huang,et al.  Sentinel lymph node in endometrial cancer: A systematic review on laparoscopic detection , 2013 .

[33]  R. Barakat,et al.  Impact of incorporating an algorithm that utilizes sentinel lymph node mapping during minimally invasive procedures on the detection of stage IIIC endometrial cancer. , 2013, Gynecologic oncology.

[34]  Susan Mallett,et al.  QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[35]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[36]  Ingram Olkin,et al.  Why add anything to nothing? The arcsine difference as a measure of treatment effect in meta‐analysis with zero cells , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[37]  C. Morrow,et al.  Relationship between surgical‐pathological risk factors and outcome in clinical stage I and II carcinoma of the endometrium: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study , 1991, Gynecologic oncology.

[38]  B. Bundy,et al.  Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer: A gynecologic oncology group study , 1987, Cancer.

[39]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[40]  B. Bundy,et al.  Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer: A gynecologic oncology group study , 1987, Cancer.