The price of risk reduction: Optimization of test and maintenance integrating risk and cost

Abstract Testing and maintenance (T&M) improve the reliability of safety systems and components in nuclear power plants, which is of special importance for standby systems. Early optimizations of single component test intervals were based on minimizing the risk, e.g. the time-average unavailability, without cost considerations. However, the appropriate development of T&M strategy depends not only on the T&M intervals but also on the resources (human and material) available to implement such strategies. Since these testing and maintenance activities are associated with substantial cost, they present an important domain, where risk reduction and costs can be balanced. The objective of this paper focuses on assessing how costs and component ageing may affect the T&M optimization in terms of minimal system risk. The costs are expressed as a function of the selected risk measure. The time-averaged function of the selected risk measure is obtained from probabilistic safety assessment, i.e. the fault tree analysis at the system level, extended with inclusion of time parameters related to T&M activities. Additionally, component ageing is taken into account while developing the system reliability model presented in this paper. The testing strategy is also addressed. Sequential and staggered testing strategies are compared. The developed approach is applied on a standard test system and the obtained results are presented. The results show that the risk-informed surveillance requirements differ from existing ones in technical specifications, which are deterministically based. The presented approach achieves a significant reduction in system unavailability accompanied with relatively small changes in total T&M costs.

[1]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Multiobjective optimization by genetic algorithms: application to safety systems , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[2]  Sebastian Martorell,et al.  Genetic algorithms in optimizing surveillance and maintenance of components , 1997 .

[3]  M. Čepin,et al.  Consideration of ageing within probabilistic safety assessment models and results , 2009 .

[4]  J. Vaurio Optimization of test and maintenance intervals based on risk and cost , 1995 .

[5]  Sofía Carlos,et al.  Constrained optimization of test intervals using a steady-state genetic algorithm , 2000, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  Ajit Srividya,et al.  Test interval optimization of safety systems of nuclear power plant using fuzzy-genetic approach , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[7]  Z. Šimić,et al.  Prediction of the time-dependent failure rate for normally operating components taking into account the operational history , 2008 .

[8]  Sebastian Martorell,et al.  Risk analysis of surveillance requirements including their adverse effects , 1994 .

[9]  Joon-Eon Yang,et al.  Optimization of the Surveillance Test Interval of the Safety Systems at the Plant Level , 2000 .

[10]  Marko Cepin,et al.  Optimization of safety equipment outages improves safety , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Maintenance modelling and applications , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  G. Apostolakis,et al.  The Unavailability of Systems Under Periodic Test and Maintenance , 1980 .

[13]  Sofía Carlos,et al.  Simultaneous and multi-criteria optimization of TS requirements and maintenance at NPPs , 2002 .

[14]  J. K. Vaurio On time-dependent availability and maintenance optimization of standby units under various maintenance policies , 1997 .

[15]  Sebastian Martorell,et al.  Age-dependent reliability model considering effects of maintenance and working conditions , 1999 .

[16]  Ajit Srividya,et al.  Optimisation of ISI interval using genetic algorithms for risk informed in-service inspection , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  Ana Sánchez,et al.  Addressing imperfect maintenance modelling uncertainty in unavailability and cost based optimization , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  Radim Bris,et al.  Parallel simulation algorithm for maintenance optimization based on directed Acyclic Graph , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[19]  Marvin Rausand,et al.  Reliability centered maintenance , 1998 .

[20]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Reliability engineering: Old problems and new challenges , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[21]  Enrico Zio,et al.  A Monte Carlo methodological approach to plant availability modeling with maintenance, aging and obsolescence , 2000, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[22]  Borut Mavko,et al.  A dynamic fault tree , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[23]  Sebastian Martorell,et al.  Improving allowed outage time and surveillance test interval requirements: a study of their interactions using probabilistic methods , 1995 .

[24]  Blas Galván,et al.  Use of multiple objective evolutionary algorithms in optimizing surveillance requirements , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[25]  B. Mavko,et al.  Probabilistic safety assessment improves surveillance requirements in technical specifications , 1997 .

[26]  Jussi K. Vaurio The theory and quantification of common cause shock events for redundant standby systems , 1994 .

[27]  J. K. Vaurio Unavailability analysis of periodically tested standby components , 1995 .

[28]  Ana Sánchez,et al.  Comparing effectiveness and efficiency in technical specifications and maintenance optimization , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[29]  Stan Uryasev,et al.  Optimization of test strategies: a general approach , 1993 .

[30]  Tunc Aldemir,et al.  Optimization of standby safety system maintenance schedules in nuclear power plants , 1996 .

[31]  Philippe Delsarte,et al.  On the optimal scheduling of periodic tests and maintenance for reliable redundant components , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[32]  Sebastián Martorell,et al.  Modelling and optimization of proof testing policies for safety instrumented systems , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..