Some Empirical Regularities in Market Shares

We present some empirical regularities in the market shares of brands. Our cross-sectional data on market shares consists of 1,171 brands in 91 product categories of foods and sporting goods sold in the United States. One of our results is that the pattern of market shares for each of the categories (many of which are fundamentally dissimilar, such as breakfast cereals and rifles) is represented well by the power law. The power law also does better than an alternative model---namely, the exponential form---which has previously been studied in the literature but without having been compared to any alternative. These two models have sharply different implications; for example, the power law predicts that the ratio of market shares for two successively ranked brands becomes smaller as one progresses from higher-ranked to lower-ranked brands, whereas the exponential form predicts that this ratio is a constant. Our findings have several managerial and research implications, which we summarize.

[1]  William A. Brock,et al.  Scaling in Economics: A Reader's Guide , 1999 .

[2]  B. Mandelbrot.  New Methods in Statistical Economics , 1963, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The Nature of Markets in the World Wide Web , 1999 .

[4]  Some Patterns of Market Shares of Brands Within and Across Product Categories , 2005 .

[5]  D. Aaker,et al.  Is Market Share all that It's Cracked up to Be? , 1985 .

[6]  John D. C. Little,et al.  A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner Data , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[7]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  Empirical Generalizations and Marketing Science: A Personal View , 1995 .

[8]  D. Jorgenson,et al.  Transcendental Logarithmic Utility Functions , 1975 .

[9]  David Asch,et al.  The Nature of Markets , 2001 .

[10]  Wilfried R. Vanhonacker,et al.  Note—On “A Parsimonious Description of the Hendry System” , 1980 .

[11]  Mark D. Uncles,et al.  Empirical Generalisation in Marketing , 2004 .

[12]  X. Gabaix.  Zipf's Law for Cities: An Explanation , 1999 .

[13]  A. Ehrenberg,et al.  The Design of Replicated Studies , 1993 .

[14]  Raymond A. K. Cox,et al.  A Stochastic Model of Superstardom: An Application of the Yule Distribution , 1994 .

[15]  J. Muellbauer,et al.  Economics and consumer behavior , 1980 .

[16]  H A Simon,et al.  Some distributions associated with bose-einstein statistics. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  M. Uncles,et al.  Understanding brand performance measures: using Dirichlet benchmarks , 2004 .

[18]  H. Simon,et al.  On Judging the Plausibility of Theories , 1977 .

[19]  G. Kalyanaram,et al.  Order of Market Entry: Established Empirical Generalizations, Emerging Empirical Generalizations, and Future Research , 1995 .

[20]  R. D. Buzzell,et al.  Are There “Natural” Market Structures? , 1981 .

[21]  Andrew Ehrenberg,et al.  Empirical Generalisations, Theory, and Method , 1995 .

[22]  Bruce M. Hill,et al.  The Rank-Frequency Form of Zipf's Law , 1974 .