PLC-SCADA Based Supply Side Management in Deregulated Power Market

The deregulation of power industry is restructuring of rules of monopoly, hence bringing in more private players to sell or buy the electricity as a commodity. The power and price values are bid by the respective generation companies (GENCO’s) and distribution companies (DISCOM’s) through the electronic mode. There are various complex computing methods for determining the optimum price among which the power exchange curve method is discussed herewith. By plotting demand and supplier power characteristics curves, the intersection point, MCP (Market clearing price) can be determined. MCP calculation is one of the most important functions of a power pool operator. Its main objective is to maximize the Global welfare function where the generating companies and the consumers are benefited and unbiased. The MCP is calculated using MATLAB software and the winning bidders of the current market are found. The power obtained for the winning supplier then undergoes optimum scheduling for generation optimization namely, supply side management. The power optimization includes Unit Commitment (UC) and selected units to be committed undergo Economic Load Dispatch (ELD). For practical implacability, the supply side power management is implemented using Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) communicated through the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system. Key-Words: Deregulation, Market Clearing Price, Generating Companies, Distribution Companies, Programmable Logic Controller, Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition System.

[1]  R. D. Tabors,et al.  Lessons from the UK and Norway , 1996 .

[2]  Daniel M. Frances,et al.  Optimization-Based Bidding in Day-Ahead Electricity Auction Markets: A Review of Models for Power Producers , 2012 .

[3]  GRAPHICAL SCHEME FOR DETERMINATION OF MARKET CLEARING PRICE USING QUADRATIC BID FUNCTIONS , 2011 .

[4]  F. Stacke,et al.  A Combined Pool/Bilateral/Reserve Electricity Market Operating Under Pay-as-Bid Pricing , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  Igor Kuzle,et al.  Choosing the Optimal Approach to Define the Methodology of a Tariff System for Thermal Energy Activities , 2007 .

[6]  Robert J. Thomas,et al.  Underlying technical issues in electricity deregulation , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[7]  P. Pentayya,et al.  Electricity transmission pricing: tracing based point-of-connection tariff for Indian power system , 2006, 2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[8]  J. McCalley,et al.  Market-based transmission expansion planning , 2011, 2011 IEEE/PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition.

[9]  Dan P. Werner Electricity Market Price Volatility: The Importance of Ramping Costs , 2014 .

[10]  T. McGoverna,et al.  Deregulation and restructuring of the global electricity supply industry and its impact upon power plant suppliers , 2004 .

[11]  Felix F. Wu,et al.  A multi-agent approach to the deregulation and restructuring of power industry , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.