Effect of floor area restriction upon performance, behavior and physiology of growing-finishing pigs.

Fifteen groups of eight pigs were allocated .34, .68 or 1.01 m2 lying area per pig between 25 and 100 kg live weight. These values were chosen in accordance with Petherick's model to prevent all pigs from lying in full recumbency (.68 m2/pig) or on their sternum and belly (.34 m2/pig). Productivity decreased in the groups of pigs allowed only .34 m2/individual from 20 wk following the beginning of the experiment (70 to 80 kg). Behavioral changes were observed as early as 8 wk after the beginning of the experiment (60 to 70 kg). Severe area restriction increased time spent at the feeder. Aggression did not vary as a linear function of area allocation. Analysis of the main behavioral activities over a 10-h observation period revealed higher feeding time and lower social activity in pigs kept at .34 m2/pig. Sternum resting was more frequent than resting on the side when body weight reached 60 to 70 kg. Pigs that were submitted to the lower area allocation displayed enhanced resistance of their pituitary-adrenal axis to the dexamethasone suppression test and enhanced reactivity to adrenocorticotropic hormone injection. These findings demonstrate that behavioral and physiological responses are earlier and more sensitive indicators of adaptation to the environment than productivity.

[1]  G. McBride,et al.  Environmental design and its evaluation for intensively housed animals , 1985 .

[2]  Paul H. Hemsworth,et al.  THE EFFECT OF INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP HOUSING ON BEHAVIOURAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES RELATED TO THE WELFARE OF PREGNANT PIGS , 1985 .

[3]  G. Cronin,et al.  The welfare of adult pigs: The effects of five housing treatments on behaviour, plasma corticosteroids and injuries , 1984 .

[4]  R. Dantzer,et al.  Differences in adaptive abilities of three breeds of Chinese pigs. Behavioural and neuroendocrine studies , 1984, Génétique, sélection, évolution.

[5]  E. Kornegay,et al.  The effects of restricted floor space allowance and virginiamycin supplementation on the feedlot performance of swine , 1983 .

[6]  K. Mitchell,et al.  The effect of three stocking rates of pigs housed in identical-sized pens on performance , 1983 .

[7]  R. Dantzer,et al.  Stress in farm animals: a need for reevaluation. , 1983, Journal of animal science.

[8]  P. Jensen,et al.  An analysis of agonistic interaction patterns in group-housed dry sows — Aggression regulation through an “avoidance order” , 1982 .

[9]  G. Cromwell,et al.  Effects of Group Size and Space Allowance on Performance and Behavior of Swine , 1981 .

[10]  C. Gaskins,et al.  Porcine aggression: measurement and effects of crowding and fasting. , 1980 .

[11]  T. Friend,et al.  Change in adrenal response from free stall competition. , 1979, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  T. Friend,et al.  Adrenal glucocorticoid response to exogenous adrenocorticotropin mediated by density and social disruption in lactating cows. , 1977, Journal of dairy science.

[13]  J. Craig,et al.  Agonistic behavior of caged chickens related to group size and area per bird , 1975 .

[14]  M. Bryant,et al.  Effects of stocking rate upon the performance, general activity and ingestive behaviour of groups of growing pigs. , 1974, The British veterinary journal.

[15]  M. Bryant,et al.  Aggressive behaviour amongst groups of domesticated pigs kept at various stocking rates. , 1972, Animal behaviour.

[16]  G. W. Snedecor STATISTICAL METHODS , 1967 .

[17]  A. H. Jensen,et al.  Effects of Floor Space Allowance and Number per Group on Performance of Growing-Finishing Swine , 1966 .

[18]  T. E. Bond,et al.  Space Allotment and Performance of Growing-Finishing Swine Raised in Confinement , 1961 .

[19]  S. Curtis,et al.  Behavior and performance of weanling pigs in pens equipped with hide areas. , 1985, Journal of animal science.