Analysis of cross-correlation and wavelet de-noising for the reduction of the effects of dispersion in long-range ultrasonic testing

Long-range ultrasonic testing (LRUT) involves transmitting a guided ultrasonic wave through a structure and receiving echoes caused by changes in acoustic impedance. There are several modes of propagation of the ultrasonic signal (wave modes) that depend on the structure and the test frequency. Some of these wave modes are dispersive: their velocity changes with frequency. Generally, LRUT procedures are designed such that non-dispersive wave modes are transmitted. However, interaction of the ultrasonic wave with the structure leads to mode conversions, some of which will be to dispersive wave modes. The effect of these dispersive wave modes is to reduce the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the received signal. Cross-correlation and wavelet de-noising are considered here for reduction of the effect of dispersive wavemodes. An LRUT signal with dispersive and non-dispersive wave modes has been simulated and used to test these techniques. Experimental data have also been collected and used to evaluate further these techniques. Cross-correlation of the transmitted and received signals did not lead to significant improvement in SNR in either the simulated or experimental signals and led to a decrease in SNR in many of the simulated signals. Wavelet de-noising appeared to work well on some of the simulated LR UT signals, where the amplitude of the non-dispersive mode was greater than that of the dispersive mode. With the experimental data this technique improved the SNR slightly, but led to distortion of the signal. The results show that neither technique appears to be able to effectively discriminate between dispersive and non-dispersive wave modes.

[1]  P. Cawley,et al.  A signal regeneration technique for long-range propagation of dispersive Lamb waves , 1993 .

[2]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  Paul S. Addison,et al.  The Illustrated Wavelet Transform Handbook , 2002 .

[4]  Drai Redouane,et al.  Flaw Detection in Ultrasonics Using Wavelets Transform and Split Spectrum processing , 2000 .

[5]  P. Wilcox,et al.  The effect of dispersion on long range inspection using ultrasonic guided waves , 2001 .

[6]  Sam-Kit Sin,et al.  A comparison of wavelet deconvolution techniques for ultrasonic NDT , 1988, ICASSP-88., International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[7]  Alan V. Oppenheim,et al.  Discrete-Time Signal Pro-cessing , 1989 .

[8]  E. Kazanavicius,et al.  Wavelet transform based signal processing method for nondestructive testing , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control.

[9]  P.D. Wilcox,et al.  A rapid signal processing technique to remove the effect of dispersion from guided wave signals , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[10]  Redouane Drai,et al.  Time frequency and wavelet transform applied to selected problems in ultrasonics NDE , 2002 .

[11]  Daniel Massicotte,et al.  Wavelet-transform-based method of analysis for Lamb-wave ultrasonic NDE signals , 2000, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas..