Expanding the binding specificity for RNA recognition by a PUF domain

The ability to design a protein to bind specifically to a target RNA enables numerous applications, with the modular architecture of the PUF domain lending itself to new RNA-binding specificities. For each repeat of the Pumilio-1 PUF domain, we generate a library that contains the 8,000 possible combinations of amino acid substitutions at residues critical for RNA contact. We carry out yeast three-hybrid selections with each library against the RNA recognition sequence for Pumilio-1, with any possible base present at the position recognized by the randomized repeat. We use sequencing to score the binding of each variant, identifying many variants with highly repeat-specific interactions. From these data, we generate an RNA binding code specific to each repeat and base. We use this code to design PUF domains against 16 RNAs, and find that some of these domains recognize RNAs with two, three or four changes from the wild type sequence.

[1]  Aviv Regev,et al.  RNA targeting with CRISPR–Cas13 , 2017, Nature.

[2]  The PUMILIO-RNA interaction: a single RNA-binding domain monomer recognizes a bipartite target sequence. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[3]  Marvin Wickens,et al.  Analyzing mRNA-protein complexes using a yeast three-hybrid system. , 2002, Methods.

[4]  Phillip D. Zamore,et al.  Modular Recognition of RNA by a Human Pumilio-Homology Domain , 2002, Cell.

[5]  Edward S Boyden,et al.  Programmable RNA-binding protein composed of repeats of a single modular unit , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  S. Gerstberger,et al.  The TIA1 RNA-Binding Protein Family Regulates EIF2AK2-Mediated Stress Response and Cell Cycle Progression. , 2018, Molecular cell.

[7]  A protein-RNA specificity code enables targeted activation of an endogenous human transcript , 2014, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[8]  R. Braun,et al.  MSY2 and MSY4 Bind a Conserved Sequence in the 3′ Untranslated Region of Protamine 1 mRNA In Vitro and In Vivo , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[9]  Charles S. Bond,et al.  A Combinatorial Amino Acid Code for RNA Recognition by Pentatricopeptide Repeat Proteins , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[10]  Tingting Zou,et al.  Delineation of pentatricopeptide repeat codes for target RNA prediction , 2019, Nucleic acids research.

[11]  G. Lu,et al.  Alternate modes of cognate RNA recognition by human PUMILIO proteins. , 2011, Structure.

[12]  Markus Blatter,et al.  RNA recognition motifs: boring? Not quite. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.

[13]  S. Thore,et al.  An artificial PPR scaffold for programmable RNA recognition , 2014, Nature Communications.

[14]  I. Small,et al.  Targeted cleavage of nad6 mRNA induced by a modified pentatricopeptide repeat protein in plant mitochondria , 2018, Communications Biology.

[15]  A. Aggarwal,et al.  Co-occupancy of two Pumilio molecules on a single hunchback NRE. , 2009, RNA.

[16]  R. Wharton,et al.  Binding of pumilio to maternal hunchback mRNA is required for posterior patterning in drosophila embryos , 1995, Cell.

[17]  James J. McDermott,et al.  Ribonucleoprotein Capture by in Vivo Expression of a Designer Pentatricopeptide Repeat Protein in Arabidopsis[OPEN] , 2019, Plant Cell.

[18]  M. Wickens,et al.  Target selection by natural and redesigned PUF proteins , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Q. Wang,et al.  Structural basis for specific single-stranded RNA recognition by designer pentatricopeptide repeat proteins , 2016, Nature Communications.

[20]  Marvin Wickens,et al.  Binding specificity and mRNA targets of a C. elegans PUF protein, FBF-1. , 2005, RNA.

[21]  G. Crooks,et al.  WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. , 2004, Genome research.

[22]  S. Yokoyama,et al.  Structural insight into RNA recognition motifs: versatile molecular Lego building blocks for biological systems , 2012, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA.

[23]  S. Sakr,et al.  The PUF Protein Family: Overview on PUF RNA Targets, Biological Functions, and Post Transcriptional Regulation , 2018, International journal of molecular sciences.

[24]  Marvin Wickens,et al.  NANOS-3 and FBF proteins physically interact to control the sperm–oocyte switch in Caenorhabditis elegans , 1999, Current Biology.

[25]  N. Mukherjee,et al.  Ribonomic Analysis of Human Pum1 Reveals cis-trans Conservation across Species despite Evolution of Diverse mRNA Target Sets , 2008, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[26]  K. McKenney,et al.  Post-transcriptional Regulatory Functions of Mammalian Pumilio Proteins. , 2018, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[27]  Traci M. Tanaka Hall,et al.  Integrated analysis of RNA-binding protein complexes using in vitro selection and high-throughput sequencing and sequence specificity landscapes (SEQRS). , 2017, Methods.

[28]  Max J. Kellner,et al.  A cytosine deaminase for programmable single-base RNA editing , 2019, Science.

[29]  Hayden C. Metsky,et al.  Programmable Inhibition and Detection of RNA Viruses Using Cas13. , 2019, Molecular cell.

[30]  Sergey A. Shmakov,et al.  Cas 13 b Is a Type VIB CRISPR-Associated RNA-Guided RNase Differentially Regulated by Accessory Proteins Csx 27 and Csx 28 , 2017 .

[31]  K. Köhler.  complexes , 2020, Catalysis from A to Z.

[32]  C. Cheong,et al.  Engineering RNA sequence specificity of Pumilio repeats , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Eric S. Lander,et al.  C2c2 is a single-component programmable RNA-guided RNA-targeting CRISPR effector , 2016, Science.

[34]  Aleksandra Filipovska,et al.  A universal code for RNA recognition by PUF proteins. , 2011, Nature chemical biology.

[35]  Stephen J Dolgner,et al.  Understanding and engineering RNA sequence specificity of PUF proteins. , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.

[36]  Zefeng Wang,et al.  Engineered proteins with Pumilio/fem‐3 mRNA binding factor scaffold to manipulate RNA metabolism , 2013, The FEBS journal.

[37]  K. P. Watkins,et al.  Ribonucleoprotein Capture by in Vivo Expression of a Designer Pentatricopeptide Repeat Protein in Arabidopsis. , 2019, The Plant Cell.

[38]  Deepak T Nair,et al.  Structures of human Pumilio with noncognate RNAs reveal molecular mechanisms for binding promiscuity. , 2008, Structure.

[39]  Marvin Wickens,et al.  A single spacer nucleotide determines the specificities of two mRNA regulatory proteins , 2005, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[40]  Yang Wang,et al.  Specific and Modular Binding Code for Cytosine Recognition in Pumilio/FBF (PUF) RNA-binding Domains*♦ , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[41]  Kira S. Makarova,et al.  Cas13b is a Type VI-B CRISPR-associated RNA-Guided RNase differentially regulated by accessory proteins Csx27 and Csx28 , 2016, bioRxiv.

[42]  Mihaela Zavolan,et al.  Comparative Analysis of mRNA Targets for Human PUF-Family Proteins Suggests Extensive Interaction with the miRNA Regulatory System , 2008, PloS one.

[43]  Kira S. Makarova,et al.  Cas13d is a compact RNA-targeting type VI CRISPR effector positively modulated by a WYL domain-containing accessory protein , 2018, Molecular cell.

[44]  Yoshio Umezawa,et al.  Imaging dynamics of endogenous mitochondrial RNA in single living cells , 2007, Nature Methods.

[45]  J. Šponer,et al.  Aromatic side-chain conformational switch on the surface of the RNA Recognition Motif enables RNA discrimination , 2017, Nature Communications.

[46]  G. Varani,et al.  Targeted inhibition of oncogenic miR-21 maturation with designed RNA-binding proteins , 2016, Nature chemical biology.

[47]  A. Aggarwal,et al.  Structure of Pumilio Reveals Similarity between RNA and Peptide Binding Motifs , 2001, Cell.

[48]  Alice Barkan,et al.  RNA-binding specificity landscape of the pentatricopeptide repeat protein PPR10 , 2017, RNA.

[49]  D. G. Gibson,et al.  Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases , 2009, Nature Methods.

[50]  T. Hall.  Expanding the RNA-recognition code of PUF proteins , 2014, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[51]  P. Zamore,et al.  Crystal structure of a Pumilio homology domain. , 2001, Molecular cell.

[52]  James J. Collins,et al.  Multiplexed and portable nucleic acid detection platform with Cas13, Cas12a, and Csm6 , 2018, Science.

[53]  C. Dominguez,et al.  The RNA recognition motif, a plastic RNA‐binding platform to regulate post‐transcriptional gene expression , 2005, The FEBS journal.

[54]  David L. Young,et al.  Deep mutational scanning of an RRM domain of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae poly(A)-binding protein , 2013, RNA.

[55]  Vanessa E. Gray,et al.  Multiplex Assessment of Protein Variant Abundance by Massively Parallel Sequencing , 2018, Nature Genetics.

[56]  Marvin Wickens,et al.  RNA-protein interactions in the yeast three-hybrid system: affinity, sensitivity, and enhanced library screening. , 2005, RNA.

[57]  Matthew T Miller,et al.  Basis of altered RNA-binding specificity by PUF proteins revealed by crystal structures of yeast Puf4p , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[58]  Shimpei Hayashi,et al.  Elucidation of the RNA Recognition Code for Pentatricopeptide Repeat Proteins Involved in Organelle RNA Editing in Plants , 2013, PloS one.

[59]  Neville E. Sanjana,et al.  Massively parallel Cas13 screens reveal principles for guide RNA design , 2020, Nature Biotechnology.

[60]  T. Lithgow,et al.  PUF proteins: repression, activation and mRNA localization. , 2011, Trends in cell biology.

[61]  Marvin Wickens,et al.  Structural basis for specific recognition of multiple mRNA targets by a PUF regulatory protein , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  P. Brown,et al.  Evolutionary Conservation and Diversification of Puf RNA Binding Proteins and Their mRNA Targets , 2015, PLoS biology.

[63]  Sergey A. Shmakov,et al.  Cas13b is a Type VI-B CRISPR-associated RNA-Guided RNase differentially regulated by accessory proteins Csx27 and Csx28 , 2016, bioRxiv.