Usefulness of Serum Tumor Markers, Including Progastrin-Releasing Peptide, in Patients with Lung Cancer: Correlation with Histology

Background: Tumor markers have been extensively studied in lung cancer, reporting some relationship to the histology, but their clinical utility is not clear. Methods: ProGRP, CEA, SCC, CA 125, CYFRA 21-1 and NSE were studied prospectively in 155 patients with unconfirmed suspicion of lung cancer and in 647 patients with lung cancer: 182 squamous, 205 adenocarcinomas, 19 large-cell lung cancer (LCLC), 175 small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and 66 unspecific non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Results: Abnormal tumor marker serum levels were found in less than 5.3% of the patients with benign diseases, excluding CA 125 (21.3%). Tumor markers were related to histological type and tumor extension with significantly higher CEA (p <0.01) and CA 125 (p <0.007) serum levels in adenocarcinomas, SCC (p <0.0001) and CYFRA 21-1 (p <0.008) in squamous tumors and ProGRP (p <0.0001) and NSE (p <0.0001) in SCLC. Tumor markers may be useful in the histological differentiation of NSCLC and SCLC. Patients with SCC serum levels >2 ng/ml were always NSCLC, while those with SCC <2 ng/ml and ProGRP >100 pg/ml and NSE >35 ng/ml were all SCLC patients. The sensitivity was 76.7 and 79.5%, specificity was 97.2 and 99.6%, with a positive predictive value of 98.6 and 98.6% and a negative predictive value of 60.7 and 92.9% in the differentiation of NSCLC and SCLC, respectively. Conclusions: Tumor marker determination in patients with suspicious signs of lung cancer suggests, in a few hours, the histological diagnosis in the majority of lung cancer patients.

[1]  I A Mjör,et al.  Consensus Report , 1985, Journal of dental research.

[2]  N. Viñolas,et al.  Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (proGRP) in patients with benign and malignant diseases: comparison with CEA, SCC, CYFRA 21-1 and NSE in patients with lung cancer. , 2005, Anticancer research.

[3]  R. Ginsberg,et al.  Staging and prognostic factors in small cell lung cancer: a consensus report , 1989 .

[4]  J. Bruix,et al.  Cancer antigen 125 in serum and ascitic fluid of patients with liver diseases. , 1991, Clinical chemistry.

[5]  B. Yalcin,et al.  Multidisciplinary management of lung cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  R. Molina,et al.  Study of a new tumor marker, CYFRA 21-1, in malignant and nonmalignant diseases. , 1994, Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine.

[7]  N. Viñolas,et al.  Tumor Markers (CEA, CA 125, CYFRA 21-1, SCC and NSE) in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer as an Aid in Histological Diagnosis and Prognosis , 2003, Tumor Biology.

[8]  J. Kulpa,et al.  Carcinoembryonic antigen, squamous cell carcinoma antigen, CYFRA 21-1, and neuron-specific enolase in squamous cell lung cancer patients. , 2002, Clinical chemistry.

[9]  R. Miceli,et al.  Tumour markers CEA, NSE, SCC, TPA and CYFRA 21.1 in resectable non-small cell lung cancer. , 1999, Anticancer research.

[10]  H. Ohmatsu,et al.  Significance of serum pro-gastrin-releasing peptide as a predictor of relapse of small cell lung cancer: comparative evaluation with neuron-specific enolase and carcinoembryonic antigen. , 2000, Lung cancer.

[11]  R. Molina,et al.  ProGRP: a new biomarker for small cell lung cancer. , 2004, Clinical biochemistry.

[12]  Ana Filipa Costa,et al.  [Small cell lung cancer--state of the art and future perspectives]. , 2007, Revista portuguesa de pneumologia.

[13]  D. Ettinger,et al.  Staging and prognostic factors in small cell carcinoma of the lung. , 1983, Cancer treatment reports.

[14]  J. Nikliński,et al.  Prognostic value of pretreatment CEA, SCC‐Ag and CA 19–9 levels in sera of patients with non‐small cell lung cancer , 1992, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[15]  C. Mountain,et al.  The international system for staging lung cancer. , 2000, Seminars in surgical oncology.

[16]  N. Siafakas,et al.  Prognostic Value of Serum Tumor Markers in Patients with Lung Cancer , 2002, Respiration.

[17]  N. Sunaga,et al.  Serum Pro-Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Is a Useful Marker for Treatment Monitoring and Survival in Small-Cell Lung Cancer , 1999, Oncology.

[18]  P. Lamy,et al.  Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide, neuron specific enolase and chromogranin A as serum markers of small cell lung cancer. , 2000, Lung cancer.

[19]  R. Molina,et al.  Cyfra 21–1 in Lung Cancer: Comparison with Cea, Ca 125, Scc and Nse Serum Levels , 1994, The International journal of biological markers.

[20]  K. Kiura,et al.  Complementary roles of pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) and neuron specific enolase (NSE) in diagnosis and prognosis of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). , 2001, Lung cancer.

[21]  M. Fukuoka,et al.  Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (31-98) as a tumour marker of small-cell lung cancer: comparative evaluation with neuron-specific enolase. , 1996, British Journal of Cancer.

[22]  H. Dienemann,et al.  Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP)--a useful marker in small cell lung carcinomas. , 1999, Anticancer research.

[23]  H. Ohmatsu,et al.  Clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma with elevated serum progastrin‐releasing peptide levels , 1998, Cancer.

[24]  P. Johnson,et al.  Serum neuron-specific enolase (S-NSE) and the prognosis in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC): a combined multivariable analysis on data from nine centres. , 1996, British Journal of Cancer.

[25]  H. Hansen,et al.  Long-term survival in small-cell lung cancer: posttreatment characteristics in patients surviving 5 to 18+ years--an analysis of 1,714 consecutive patients. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  M. Plebani,et al.  Clinical evaluation of seven tumour markers in lung cancer diagnosis: can any combination improve the results? , 1995, British Journal of Cancer.

[27]  J. Schiller,et al.  Current Standards of Care in Small-Cell and Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer , 2001, Oncology.

[28]  D. Ferrigno,et al.  Clinical equivalence of two cytokeratin markers in mon-small cell lung cancer: a study of tissue polypeptide antigen and cytokeratin 19 fragments. , 2003, Chest.

[29]  N. Viñolas,et al.  Tumor markers in response monitoring and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer: preliminary report. , 1998, Anticancer research.

[30]  K. Aoyagi,et al.  Enzyme immunoassay of immunoreactive progastrin-releasing peptide(31-98) as tumor marker for small-cell lung carcinoma: development and evaluation. , 1995, Clinical chemistry.

[31]  D. Ferrigno,et al.  Lung tumour markers in oncology practice: a study of TPA and CA125 , 2002, British Journal of Cancer.

[32]  Michael Thomas,et al.  Prognostic impact of Cyfra21-1 and other serum markers in completely resected non-small cell lung cancer. , 2002, Lung cancer.

[33]  Y. Shimosato,et al.  Histological Typing of Lung and Pleural Tumours , 1999, World Health Organization.

[34]  Franco Ameglio,et al.  Discriminant analysis on small cell lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer by means of NSE and CYFRA-21.1. , 1995, The European respiratory journal.

[35]  K. Eguchi,et al.  Serum levels of pro-gastrin-releasing peptide for follow-up of patients with small cell lung cancer. , 1997, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[36]  J. Aparicio,et al.  Pretreatment prognostic factors for survival in small-cell lung cancer: a new prognostic index and validation of three known prognostic indices on 341 patients. , 1997, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[37]  J. Balibrea,et al.  Prediction of survival and recurrence by serum and cytosolic levels of CEA, CA125 and SCC antigens in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer. , 1996, British Journal of Cancer.