Multi-attribute decision making methods based on reference ideal theory with probabilistic hesitant information

Abstract In real world, the best choice may not be the maximum or the minimum but between them, such as the befitting temperature for plants to grow, the suitable pH value for the human health, etc. Meanwhile, since the decision makers’ evaluations may be different and none of them can be ignored, the probabilistic hesitant fuzzy sets were proposed to help the decision makers express their opinions in a simple and comprehensive way. Therefore, the traditional multi-attribute decision making methods cannot deal with this situation and a series of new decision-making methods based on probabilistic hesitant fuzzy sets are developed in this paper. Firstly, we investigate the relationships between the probabilistic hesitant fuzzy elements and the reference ideal values, and propose two distance measures which take all the possible situations into consideration. Then, by combining the reference ideal method and the probabilistic hesitant fuzzy sets, we develop three different decision-making methods to process the reference ideal multi-attribute decision making problem. Then, we apply these methods in the water conservancy project evaluation problem to verify the operability of the methods. We also conduct a comparison analysis to study the reasonability and the stability of these methods. Based on the comparison results, we find that the methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, and different methods are suitable for different decision-making environments and demands. These proposed methods extend the reference ideal methods to the probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environments and provide new angles of decision making in the research field of expert and intelligent systems.

[1]  Wen-Pai Wang,et al.  Toward developing agility evaluation of mass customization systems using 2-tuple linguistic computing , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[2]  Janusz Kacprzyk,et al.  Computing with Words in Information/Intelligent Systems 1 , 1999 .

[3]  Ting Kuo,et al.  A modified TOPSIS with a different ranking index , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Mohammad Izadikhah,et al.  Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision-making problems with fuzzy data , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[5]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS for supplier selection , 2009, Appl. Soft Comput..

[6]  Ting-Yu Chen,et al.  The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis , 2008, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[7]  Da Ruan,et al.  A comparison study of fuzzy MADM methods in nuclear safeguards evaluation , 2011, J. Glob. Optim..

[8]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy set and its application in risk evaluation , 2017, Knowl. Based Syst..

[9]  K. L. Edwards,et al.  VIKOR method for material selection problems with interval numbers and target-based criteria , 2013 .

[10]  Won Kyung Kim,et al.  The behavioral TOPSIS , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  Mohammad Jafar Tarokh,et al.  A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[12]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[13]  Akbar Esfahanipour,et al.  Decision making in stock trading: An application of PROMETHEE , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  P. Kloeden,et al.  Metric Spaces of Fuzzy Sets: Theory and Applications , 1994 .

[15]  Daniela Fuchs-Hanusch,et al.  A framework for water loss management in developing countries under fuzzy environment: Integration of Fuzzy AHP with Fuzzy TOPSIS , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[16]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[17]  Gin-Shuh Liang,et al.  A novel hybrid decision-making model for selecting locations in a fuzzy environment , 2011, Math. Comput. Model..

[18]  José L. Verdegay,et al.  RIM-reference ideal method in multicriteria decision making , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[19]  Diyar Akay,et al.  A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  Ming-Chyuan Lin,et al.  Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process , 2008, Comput. Ind..

[21]  Yu-Jie Wang,et al.  Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making based on positive and negative extreme solutions , 2011 .

[22]  B. Golany,et al.  A multicriteria evaluation of methods for obtaining weights from ratio-scale matrices , 1993 .

[23]  Gang Kou,et al.  An empirical study of classification algorithm evaluation for financial risk prediction , 2011, Appl. Soft Comput..

[24]  Guo ZongLou Methods for environmental impact assessment of agricultural water conservancy projects. , 2000 .

[25]  Zheng Zhou,et al.  An innovative TOPSIS approach based on hesitant fuzzy correlation coefficient and its applications , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[26]  Deng Yong Plant location selection based on fuzzy TOPSIS , 2006 .

[27]  Xu Fu Indicators and Fuzzy Cluster Method for Comprehensive Environmental Impact Assessment of Large scale Water Conservancy Engineering , 2001 .

[28]  Zhiming Zhang,et al.  Weighted Hesitant Fuzzy Sets and Their Application toMulti-Criteria Decision Making , 2014 .

[29]  Yongtae Park,et al.  Review-based measurement of customer satisfaction in mobile service: Sentiment analysis and VIKOR approach , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[30]  V. Torra,et al.  A framework for linguistic logic programming , 2010 .

[31]  Giuseppe Aiello,et al.  Clean Agent Selection Approached by Fuzzy TOPSIS Decision-Making Method , 2009 .

[32]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[33]  Bertrand Mareschal,et al.  Prométhée: a new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis , 1984 .

[34]  Anjali Awasthi,et al.  Application of fuzzy TOPSIS in evaluating sustainable transportation systems , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[35]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  An interactive approach to probabilistic hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making with incomplete weight information , 2017, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[36]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  A fuzzy group quality function deployment model for e-CRM framework assessment in agile manufacturing , 2011, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[37]  Emel Kizilkaya Aydogan,et al.  Performance measurement model for Turkish aviation firms using the rough-AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[38]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Information systems outsourcing decisions using a group decision-making approach , 2009, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[39]  Halil Çalışkan,et al.  Material selection for the tool holder working under hard milling conditions using different multi criteria decision making methods , 2013 .

[40]  Zhang Hui-qian Environmental Impact Features of Middle and Small Scale Water Conservancy Projects and its Countermeasures , 2001 .

[41]  Jerzy W. Grzymala-Busse,et al.  Rough Sets , 1995, Commun. ACM.

[42]  Zhongliang Yue,et al.  An extended TOPSIS for determining weights of decision makers with interval numbers , 2011, Knowl. Based Syst..

[43]  Hojjat Adeli,et al.  Hybridizing principles of TOPSIS with case-based reasoning for business failure prediction , 2011, Comput. Oper. Res..

[44]  Chin-Tsai Lin,et al.  Optimal marketing strategy: A decision-making with ANP and TOPSIS , 2010 .

[45]  Janusz Kacprzyk,et al.  Multistage Fuzzy Control: A Prescriptive Approach , 1997 .

[46]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management , 2006 .

[47]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  A Delphi-AHP-TOPSIS based benchmarking framework for performance improvement of a cold chain , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[48]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making , 2011, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[49]  B. Farhadinia,et al.  Utility of Correlation Measures for Weighted Hesitant Fuzzy Sets in Medical Diagnosis Problems , 2016 .

[50]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.