On Interpretational Questions for Quantum-Like Modeling of Social Lasing

The recent years were characterized by increasing interest to applications of the quantum formalism outside physics, e.g., in psychology, decision-making, socio-political studies. To distinguish such approach from quantum physics, it is called quantum-like. It is applied to modeling socio-political processes on the basis of the social laser model describing stimulated amplification of social actions. The main aim of this paper is establishing the socio-psychological interpretations of the quantum notions playing the basic role in lasing modeling. By using the Copenhagen interpretation and the operational approach to the quantum formalism, we analyze the notion of the social energy. Quantum formalizations of such notions as a social atom, s-atom, and an information field are presented. The operational approach based on the creation and annihilation operators is used. We also introduce the notion of the social color of information excitations representing characteristics linked to lasing coherence of the type of collimation. The Bose–Einstein statistics of excitations is coupled with the bandwagon effect, one of the basic effects of social psychology. By using the operational interpretation of the social energy, we present the thermodynamical derivation of this quantum statistics. The crucial role of information overload generated by the modern mass-media is emphasized. In physics laser’s resonator, the optical cavity, plays the crucial role in amplification. We model the functioning of social laser’s resonator by “distilling” the physical scheme from connection with optics. As the mathematical basis, we use the master equation for the density operator for the quantum information field.

[1]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum-like modeling of cognition , 2015, Front. Phys..

[2]  Arkady Plotnitsky,et al.  Are quantum-mechanical-like models possible, or necessary, outside quantum physics? , 2014 .

[3]  C. Fuchs Quantum Mechanics as Quantum Information (and only a little more) , 2002, quant-ph/0205039.

[4]  Andrei Khrennivov,et al.  Classical and Quantum Mechanics on Information Spaces with Applications to Cognitive, Psychological, Social, and Anomalous Phenomena , 1999, quant-ph/0003016.

[5]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Possibility to agree on disagree from quantum information and decision making , 2014 .

[6]  Fabio Bagarello,et al.  A phenomenological operator description of interactions between populations with applications to migration , 2012, 1207.2873.

[7]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Towards Information Lasers , 2015, Entropy.

[8]  R. Cooper Process and Reality , 2014 .

[9]  Andrei Khrennikov Social laser model: from color revolutions to Brexit and election of Donald Trump , 2018, Kybernetes.

[10]  Giacomo Mauro D'Ariano,et al.  Operational Axioms for Quantum Mechanics , 2006, quant-ph/0611094.

[11]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  On Selective Influences, Marginal Selectivity, and Bell/CHSH Inequalities , 2012, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[12]  Eric Schmidt,et al.  The New Digital Age: Reshaping the Future of People, Nations and Business , 2001 .

[13]  Gustav Bernroider Neuroecology: On Causal Relations Between Brain Organization, Adaptive Behaviour, Consciousness and Cognition , 2017 .

[14]  R. Ingarden,et al.  Information Dynamics and Open Systems: Classical and Quantum Approach , 1997 .

[15]  E. R Adventures of Ideas , 1933, Nature.

[16]  Emmanuel Haven,et al.  An Application of the Theory of Open Quantum Systems to Model the Dynamics of Party Governance in the US Political System , 2014 .

[17]  Arkady Plotnitsky,et al.  Epistemology and Probability: Bohr, Heisenberg, Schrödinger, and the Nature of Quantum-Theoretical Thinking , 2009 .

[18]  A. Khrennikov External Observer Reflections on QBism, Its Possible Modifications, and Novel Applications , 2015, 1512.07195.

[19]  Gianfranco Basti,et al.  Quantum Field Theory and Coalgebraic Logic in Theoretical Computer Science , 2016, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[20]  Mark J. Machina,et al.  Risk, Ambiguity, and the Rank-Dependence Axioms , 2009 .

[21]  W. Thirring,et al.  Quantum theory of laser radiation , 1964 .

[22]  M. Allais Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque : critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole americaine , 1953 .

[23]  I. Krastev Democracy Disrupted. The Global Politics of Protest , 2019, Social Science at the Crossroads.

[24]  Thorsten Gerber,et al.  On The Nature Of The Psyche , 2016 .

[25]  Arkady Plotnitsky,et al.  Niels Bohr and Complementarity: An Introduction , 2012 .

[26]  Hermann Haken,et al.  Laser light dynamics , 1985 .

[27]  Andrei Khrennikov Classical and quantum mechanics on information spaces with applications to cognitive, psychological, social and anomalous phenomena , 2000 .

[28]  Yoshiharu Tanaka,et al.  Violation of contextual generalization of the Leggett–Garg inequality for recognition of ambiguous figures , 2014, 1401.2897.

[29]  N. David Mermin,et al.  An introduction to QBism with an application to the locality of quantum mechanics , 2013, 1311.5253.

[30]  Emmanuel Haven,et al.  Private Information and the ‘Information Function’: A Survey of Possible Uses , 2008 .

[31]  Marco Zaopo Informational Axioms for Quantum Theory , 2012 .

[32]  D. Spalding The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.

[33]  Andrei Khrennikov ‘Social Laser’: action amplification by stimulated emission of social energy , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[34]  Andrei Khrennikov Quantum theory: Reconsideration of foundations , 2003 .

[35]  A. Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum Social Science , 2013 .

[36]  Sigmund Freud,et al.  The Ego and the Id , 1923 .

[37]  Jr. Fleck Quantum Theory of Laser Radiation. I. Many-Atom Effects , 1966 .

[38]  Abir U Igamberdiev,et al.  The quantum basis of spatiotemporality in perception and consciousness. , 2017, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[39]  M. S. Zubairy,et al.  Planck, Photon Statistics, and Bose-Einstein Condensation , 2007, 0712.1367.

[40]  Yoshiharu Tanaka,et al.  Quantum Adaptivity in Biology: From Genetics to Cognition , 2015, Springer Netherlands.

[41]  L. M. Ricciardi,et al.  Brain and physics of many-body problems , 1967, Kybernetik.

[42]  Adam Brandenburger,et al.  The relationship between quantum and classical correlation in games , 2010, Games Econ. Behav..

[43]  Almut Beige,et al.  A master equation for a two-sided optical cavity , 2013, Journal of modern optics.

[44]  Joseph P. Zbilut,et al.  A Preliminary Experimental Verification On the Possibility of Bell Inequality Violation in Mental States , 2008 .

[45]  Emmanuel Haven,et al.  Quantum Methods In Social Science: A First Course , 2017 .

[46]  D. Ellsberg Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1961 .

[47]  Christopher A. Fuchs,et al.  The Pauli-Jung conjecture and its impact today , 2014 .

[48]  H. Stowell The emperor's new mind R. Penrose, Oxford University Press, New York (1989) 466 pp. $24.95 , 1990, Neuroscience.

[49]  M. Wohlrab-Sahr,et al.  Interaction ritual chains , 2006 .

[50]  Pablo Jensen,et al.  Competition between collective and individual dynamics , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  D. A. Edwards The mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics , 1979, Synthese.

[52]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Quantum dynamics of human decision-making , 2006 .

[53]  Caslav Brukner,et al.  Information Invariance and Quantum Probabilities , 2009, 0905.0653.

[54]  François Dubois,et al.  Eigenlogic: A Quantum View for Multiple-Valued and Fuzzy Systems , 2016, QI.

[55]  Fabio Bagarello,et al.  Quantum Dynamics for Classical Systems: With Applications of the Number Operator , 2012 .

[56]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum Bayesianism as the basis of general theory of decision-making , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[57]  Polina Khrennikova Modeling behavior of decision makers with the aid of algebra of qubit creation–annihilation operators , 2017 .

[58]  A. Zeilinger A Foundational Principle for Quantum Mechanics , 1999, Synthese Library.

[59]  C. Jung,et al.  Atom and Archetype: The Pauli/Jung Letters, 1932-1958 , 2001 .

[60]  Stuart R. Hameroff,et al.  QUANTUM COHERENCE IN MICROTUBULES: A NEURAL BASIS FOR EMERGENT CONSCIOUSNESS? 1 , 1994 .

[61]  Irina Basieva,et al.  Quantum-like dynamics applied to cognition: a consideration of available options , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[62]  Giuseppe Vitiello,et al.  DISSIPATION AND MEMORY CAPACITY IN THE QUANTUM BRAIN MODEL , 1995, quant-ph/9502006.

[63]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision , 2012 .

[64]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Ubiquitous Quantum Structure: From Psychology to Finance , 2010 .

[65]  Coherent States in a Laser Cavity , 2015 .

[66]  G. Hall,et al.  The Interpretation of Dreams , 1914, Nature.

[67]  P. Mason Why It's Kicking Off Everywhere: The New Global Revolutions , 2011 .

[68]  Gustav Bernroider,et al.  Can Quantum Entanglement Between Ion Transition States Effect Action Potential Initiation? , 2012, Cognitive Computation.

[69]  Sébastien Duchêne,et al.  Quantum-like models cannot account for the conjunction fallacy , 2015 .

[70]  Paavo Pylkkänen Mind, Matter and the Implicate Order , 2006 .

[71]  Ruediger Schack,et al.  QBism and the Greeks: why a quantum state does not represent an element of physical reality , 2014, 1412.4211.

[72]  Youssef Meguebli,et al.  Contextual Query Using Bell Tests , 2013, QI.

[73]  C. Fuchs,et al.  Quantum probabilities as Bayesian probabilities , 2001, quant-ph/0106133.

[74]  T. Lux,et al.  From the financial crisis to sustainability , 2009 .

[75]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  A quantum probability explanation for violations of ‘rational’ decision theory , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[76]  G. Bernroider Neuroecology: Modeling Neural Systems and Environments, from the Quantum to the Classical Level and the Question of Consciousness , 2017 .

[77]  A. Khrennikov Information Dynamics in Cognitive, Psychological, Social, and Anomalous Phenomena , 2004 .

[78]  G. D’Ariano,et al.  Probabilistic theories with purification , 2009, 0908.1583.