A regional study of quality management infrastructure practices in USA and Mexico

Presents the results of a study on quality management infrastructure practices and quality performance in manufacturing companies located in the North and Central regions of Mexico and the US Midwest region. Seven quality management infrastructure practices – top management support, strategic quality planning, quality information availability, employee training, supplier quality, customer focus, and quality citizenship – were assessed and compared. The research covered 372 manufacturing companies in both countries. Our findings show significant differences between the three regions. Companies located in the North region of Mexico exhibit significantly better levels of quality management infrastructure practices than companies located in the US Midwest and Central Mexico regions. Implications for decision‐makers for location, outsourcing, and joint ventures are discussed.

[1]  Jackie Nastri Bardenwerper.  On The Line , 2012 .

[2]  S. S. Rao,et al.  A Framework for International Quality Management Research: Development and Validation of a Measurement Instrument , 1999 .

[3]  T. S. Raghunathan,et al.  A comparative study of quality practices: USA, China and India , 1997 .

[4]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  The Impact of Quality Management Practices on Performance and Competitive Advantage , 1995 .

[5]  Christian N. Madu,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Quality Practice in Manufacturing Firms in the U.S. and Taiwan , 1995 .

[6]  Fatemeh Zahedi,et al.  Quality Information Systems , 1994, Encyclopedia of Information Systems.

[7]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR QUALITY MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND AN ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENT , 1994 .

[8]  A. Blanton Godfrey,et al.  Ten Areas for Future Research in Total Quality Management , 1993 .

[9]  T. Johnson,et al.  An analysis of operational experience in the US/Mexico production sharing (maquiladora) program , 1993 .

[10]  Charles A. Barclay.  Quality Strategy and TQM Policies: Empirical Evidence , 1993 .

[11]  T. Johnson,et al.  An assessment of quality management in the US/Mexico export processing industry , 1992 .

[12]  A. Donald Stratton,et al.  An Approach to Quality Improvement That Works , 1991 .

[13]  R. Hayes,et al.  Mexico: Opening Ahead of Eastern Europe , 1990 .

[14]  Jayant V. Saraph,et al.  An Instrument for Measuring the Critical Factors of Quality Management , 1989 .

[15]  Barrie Dale,et al.  A Review of the Issues Involved in Quality Improvement , 1988 .

[16]  G. Huber.  The Nature and Design of Post-Industrial Organizations , 1984 .

[17]  James M. Utterback,et al.  The Effects of Communication on Technological Innovation , 1984 .

[18]  T. C. Powell.  Total Quality Management as Competitive Advantage , 1995 .

[19]  M. M. Steeples.  corporate guide to the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award , 1993 .

[20]  Kenneth R. Tillery,et al.  Quality‐Strategy and Quality‐Management Connections , 1991 .

[21]  Mark A. Vonderembse,et al.  The evolution of manufacturing systems: Towards the post-industrial enterprise , 1991 .

[22]  Richard Schonberger,et al.  World class manufacturing : the lessons of simplicity applied , 1986 .

[23]  W. Deming.  Quality, productivity, and competitive position , 1982 .

[24]  F. Leonard,et al.  The Incline of Quality , 1982 .

[25]  Philip B. Crosby,et al.  Quality Is Free: The Art of Making Quality Certain , 1979 .

[26]  Armand V. Feigenbaum,et al.  Total quality control , 1961 .