Flow-Level Capacity and Performance in HetNets

The deployment of pico cells to cover traffic hot spots within the footprint of a macro cell provides a powerful approach to meet the massive growth in traffic demands fueled by smartphones and bandwidth-hungry applications. Joint optimization of resource allocation and user association is critical to achieve the maximum capacity benefits and performance gains in such heterogeneous network deployments (HetNets). In order to gain insight in the achievable capacity gains, we examine in the present paper the stability and performance of a HetNet system in the presence of flow-level dynamics. The stability condition reveals that in stationary traffic conditions the maximum capacity can be achieved with a static resource split and traffic association rule, provided that these are suitably selected. This suggests that dynamic adaptation on time scales commensurate with the variations in traffic parameters suffices to extract most of the achievable capacity gains. For the case of static cell boundaries and Proportional Fair scheduling, we also present a method for evaluating the flow-level performance in terms of the distribution of the number of active file transfers and expected transfer delay.

[1]  Sem C. Borst,et al.  Optimal resource allocation in HetNets , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[2]  Hirotaka Sato,et al.  Pico Cell Range Expansion with Interference Mitigation toward LTE-Advanced Heterogeneous Networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC).

[3]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Femtocells: Past, Present, and Future , 2012, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[4]  Sastri L. Kota,et al.  Hetnets - a new paradigm for increasing cellular capacity and coverage [Guest Editorial] , 2011 .

[5]  Halim Yanikomeroglu,et al.  Enhancing cell-edge performance: a downlink dynamic interference avoidance scheme with inter-cell coordination , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[6]  Alexandre Proutière,et al.  Wireless downlink data channels: user performance and cell dimensioning , 2003, MobiCom '03.

[7]  Young-Jun Hong,et al.  System level performance evaluation of inter-cell interference coordination schemes for heterogeneous networks in LTE-A system , 2010, 2010 IEEE Globecom Workshops.

[8]  Nobuhiko Miki,et al.  Performance evaluation of inter-cell interference coordination and cell range expansion in heterogeneous networks for LTE-Advanced downlink , 2011, 2011 8th International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems.

[9]  Laurent Massoulié,et al.  Impact of fairness on Internet performance , 2001, SIGMETRICS '01.

[10]  Nobuhiko Miki,et al.  Enhanced Inter-cell Interference Coordination for Heterogeneous Networks in LTE-Advanced: A Survey , 2011, ArXiv.

[11]  Catherine Rosenberg,et al.  Joint channel allocation and user association for heterogeneous wireless cellular networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE 22nd International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[12]  Ashwin Sampath,et al.  Cell Association and Interference Coordination in Heterogeneous LTE-A Cellular Networks , 2010, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[13]  Jun Wang,et al.  Optimized Fairness Cell Selection for 3GPP LTE-A Macro-Pico HetNets , 2011, 2011 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall).

[14]  Sem C. Borst,et al.  Throughput Utility Optimization in HetNets , 2013, 2013 IEEE 77th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[15]  Chung Shue Chen,et al.  Joint Optimization of Radio Resources in Small and Macro Cell Networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE 73rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[16]  Tony Q. S. Quek,et al.  Enhanced intercell interference coordination challenges in heterogeneous networks , 2011, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[17]  Supratim Deb,et al.  Algorithms for Enhanced Inter-Cell Interference Coordination (eICIC) in LTE HetNets , 2013, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.