A review of the development and use of video image analysis (VIA) for beef carcass evaluation as an alternative to the current EUROP system and other subjective systems.

The current EUROP beef carcass classification scheme is still largely dependent on visually assessed fatness and conformation and its purpose is to provide a common basis for the description of carcasses for use in trade, price reporting and intervention. The meat industry, however, aims for accurately predicted saleable meat yield (SMY%) to which the EUROP carcass classification shows highly variable correlations due in part to the variable distribution of fat throughout the carcass as affected by breed, sex, diet, and the level of fat trimming. Video image analysis (VIA) technology is capable of improving the precision and accuracy of SMY% prediction even for specific carcass joints and simultaneously mimics the visual assessment to comply with EU regulations on carcass classification. This review summarises the development and use of VIA for evaluation of beef carcasses and discusses the advantages and shortfalls of the technology and its application.

[1]  Da-Wen Sun,et al.  Automatic segmentation of beef longissimus dorsi muscle and marbling by an adaptable algorithm. , 2009, Meat science.

[2]  J. D. Tatum,et al.  Simulated instrument augmentation of USDA yield grade application to beef carcasses. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[3]  J. D. Tatum,et al.  Effectiveness of the SmartMV prototype BeefCam System to sort beef carcasses into expected palatability groups. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[4]  M. Irie,et al.  Rapid method for determining water-holding capacity in meat using video image analysis and simple formulae. , 1996, Meat science.

[5]  J. M. Harries,et al.  Composition of beef carcasses: III. The reliability and use of visual assessment , 1974, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[6]  J D Tatum,et al.  Video image analysis as a potential grading system for Uruguayan beef carcasses. , 2009, Journal of animal science.

[7]  S. Shackelford,et al.  Coupling of image analysis and tenderness classification to simultaneously evaluate carcass cutability, longissimus area, subprimal cut weights, and tenderness of beef. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[8]  Y. Bozkurt,et al.  Digital Image Analysis to Predict Carcass Weight and Some Carcass Characteristics of Beef Cattle , 2008 .

[9]  J. M. Harries,et al.  Composition of beef carcasses:II. The use of regression equations to estimate total tissue components from observations on intact and quartered sides and partial dissection data , 1974, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[10]  K. Ender,et al.  A New Technique for Objective Evaluation of Marbling in Beef , 1996 .

[11]  J D Tatum,et al.  Using objective measures of muscle color to predict beef longissimus tenderness. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[12]  J. Tan,et al.  Beef Marbling and Color Score Determination by Image Processing , 1996 .

[13]  Geoff Simm,et al.  Use of X-Ray Computed Tomography (CT) in UK Sheep Production and Breeding , 2011 .

[14]  L Bünger,et al.  Evaluation of Video Image Analysis (VIA) technology to predict meat yield of sheep carcasses on-line under UK abattoir conditions. , 2009, Meat science.

[15]  P. D. Warriss,et al.  Meat Science: An Introductory Text , 2010 .

[16]  P. Arthur.  Double muscling in cattle: a review , 1995 .

[17]  G. F. Krause,et al.  Retail Yield Comparison of Average Good and Average Choice Conformation Beef Carcasses , 1969 .

[18]  Roberto de Alencar Lotufo,et al.  Digital-image analysis to predict weight and yields of boneless subprimal beef cuts , 2003 .

[19]  M. McGee,et al.  The relationship of live animal muscular and skeletal scores, ultrasound measurements and carcass classification scores with carcass composition and value in steers. , 2009, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[20]  Carcass classification in suckling lambs. II. Comparison among subjective carcass classification methods: fatness scales and conformation scales with 0.25 point-intervals. , 2004, Meat science.

[21]  M. Price,et al.  Relationships between beef carcass shape and muscle to bone ratio. , 2002, Meat science.

[22]  M. McGee,et al.  The relationship of various muscular and skeletal scores and ultrasound measurements in the live animal, and carcass classification scores with carcass composition and value of bulls , 2010 .

[23]  D. Wulf,et al.  Using measurements of muscle color, pH, and electrical impedance to augment the current USDA beef quality grading standards and improve the accuracy and precision of sorting carcasses into palatability groups. , 2000, Journal of animal science.

[24]  A. Kempster.  Fat partition and distribution in the carcasses of cattle, sheep and pigs: A review. , 1981, Meat science.

[25]  J D Tatum,et al.  Real-time augmentation of USDA yield grade application to beef carcasses using video image analysis. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[26]  C. Glasbey,et al.  Assessing beef carcass tissue weights using computed tomography spirals of primal cuts. , 2010, Meat science.

[27]  David Mayer,et al.  Parameter estimation and sensitivity analysis of fat deposition models in beef steers using acslXtreme , 2009, Math. Comput. Simul..

[28]  G. Ripoll,et al.  Predicting meat yields and commercial meat cuts from carcasses of young bulls of Spanish breeds by the SEUROP method and an image analysis system. , 2010, Meat science.

[29]  A. Kempster,et al.  The relationship between conformation and the yield and distribution of lean meat in the carcasses of British pigs, cattle and sheep: A review. , 1982, Meat science.

[30]  D. Berry,et al.  Use of digital images to predict carcass cut yields in cattle , 2011 .

[31]  O. G. Hankins,et al.  Estimation of the Composition of Beef Carcasses and Cuts , 1946 .

[32]  D. M. Allen,et al.  Video Image Analysis Prediction of Total Kilograms and Percent Primal Lean and Fat Yield of Beef Carcasses , 1986 .

[33]  André Oosterlinck,et al.  Range Image Acquisition with a Single Binary-Encoded Light Pattern , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[34]  Q. Yang,et al.  Finding stalk and calyx of apples using structured lighting , 1993 .

[35]  J D Tatum,et al.  Online evaluation of a commercial video image analysis system (Computer Vision System) to predict beef carcass red meat yield and for augmenting the assignment of USDA yield grades. United States Department of Agriculture. , 2002, Journal of animal science.

[36]  Wolfgang Branscheid,et al.  Application of video image analysis in grading cattle. Instrumental determination of the slaughter value , 1999 .

[37]  Jinglu Tan,et al.  Meat quality evaluation by computer vision , 2004 .

[38]  N. Lambe,et al.  Testing selection indices for sustainable hill sheep production – lamb growth and carcass traits , 2006 .

[39]  Jiahua Wu,et al.  Extracting the three-dimensional shape of live pigs using stereo photogrammetry , 2004 .

[40]  D. Hopkins.  An industry applicable model for predicting lean meat yield in lamb carcasses , 2008 .

[41]  D. Williams.  The Visual Description of Carcasses , 1969, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[42]  K. Ender,et al.  Eine neue Methoden zur objektiven Bewertung der Marmorierung von Rindfleisch , 1996 .

[43]  Da-Wen Sun,et al.  Prediction of beef eating qualities from colour, marbling and wavelet surface texture features using homogenous carcass treatment , 2009, Pattern Recognit..

[44]  T Mitsuhashi,et al.  Computer image analysis for prediction of carcass composition from cross-sections of Japanese Black steers. , 2001, Journal of animal science.

[45]  P. Allen,et al.  Prediction of beef palatability from colour, marbling and surface texture features of longissimus dorsi , 2010 .

[46]  H. Cross,et al.  The role of instrument grading in a beef value-based marketing system. , 1992, Journal of animal science.

[47]  H. J. Swatland,et al.  Objective assessment of meat yield and quality , 1995 .

[48]  A. Shemeis,et al.  Changes in carcass and meat quality traits of Danish friesian cull cows with the increase of their age and body condition. , 1994, Meat science.

[49]  C. Ramsey,et al.  Simplified Method for Predicting Pounds of Lean in Beef Carcasses , 1962 .

[50]  J. D. Tatum,et al.  Dual-component video image analysis system (VIASCAN) as a predictor of beef carcass red meat yield percentage and for augmenting application of USDA yield grades. , 1999, Journal of animal science.

[51]  A. Kempster,et al.  Carcase Evaluation In Livestock Breeding, Production And Marketing , 1983 .

[52]  Detert Brinkmann,et al.  Videobildauswertung an Kälberschlachtkörpern , 2006 .

[53]  M. McGee,et al.  The value of muscular and skeletal scores in the live animal and carcass classification scores as indicators of carcass composition in cattle. , 2008, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[54]  C Borggaard,et al.  In-line image analysis in the slaughter industry, illustrated by Beef Carcass Classification. , 1996, Meat science.

[55]  M. McGee,et al.  Predicting beef carcass meat, fat and bone proportions from carcass conformation and fat scores or hindquarter dissection. , 2010, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[56]  R. L. Farrow,et al.  An exploratory observational study to develop an improved method for quantifying beef carcass salable meat yield. , 2009, Meat science.

[57]  D. Johnson,et al.  Relationships between New Zealand beef conformation classes, carcass composition, and muscle dimensions , 1981 .

[58]  A. Kempster,et al.  Variation in lean distribution among steer carcasses of different breeds and crosses , 1976, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[59]  S. Shackelford,et al.  On-line prediction of yield grade, longissimus muscle area, preliminary yield grade, adjusted preliminary yield grade, and marbling score using the MARC beef carcass image analysis system. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[60]  H. R. Cross,et al.  Beef Carcass Evaluation by Use of a Video Image Analysis System , 1983 .