Dawn of e-government – an institutional analysis of seven initiatives and their impact

Most countries have defined strategies for e-government. The objectives for implementing e-government are often defined but the means for fuelling the adoption and diffusion of e-government are typically less well clear in the policy statements. The present study assesses the impact of latest Danish initiative implemented to stimulate e-government adoption. The e-Day initiative simply yet powerfully states that ‘one governmental authority has the right to demand that its communication with another authority must be in electronic format’ which is expected to create ripple effects both internally and externally. The e-Day initiative represents a drastic change in the former policy statements concerning IT adoption and diffusion in Danish government. The policy statements had previously been based on voluntary adoption focusing on visions and pedagogical intervention in governmental agencies, but the e-Day initiative marked a departure from that strategy and the carrot has been exchanged by the whip, and the voice is imperative.

[1]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[2]  D. Norris,et al.  Electronic Government at the Local Level , 2003 .

[3]  Hans Jochen Scholl,et al.  Organizational Transformation Through E-Government: Myth or Reality? , 2005, EGOV.

[4]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Managing e-transformation in the public sector: an e-government study of the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) , 2003, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  A theory of industry-level activity for understanding the adoption of interorganizational systems , 2000, ECIS.

[6]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  Business-to-business E-commerce: enterprises facing a turbulent world? , 2000 .

[7]  William D. Berry,et al.  Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research , 2019, Theories of the Policy Process.

[8]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  National Information Policy developments worldwide I: electronic government , 2002, J. Inf. Sci..

[9]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  Theory of interorganizational systems: industry structure and processes of change , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[10]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[11]  Chris Meyer,et al.  Cap Gemini Ernst & Young , 2002 .

[12]  V. Lai,et al.  An assessment of the influence of organizational characteristics on information technology adoption decision: a discriminative approach , 1997 .

[13]  Kim Viborg Andersen,et al.  E-government and Public Sector Process Rebuilding: Dilettantes, Wheel Barrows, and Diamonds , 2006 .

[14]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[15]  Charles Kaylor,et al.  Gauging e-government: A report on implementing services among American cities , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[16]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  J. Elster,et al.  The Cement Of Society , 1989 .

[18]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  The Merchant of Prato - Revisited: Toward a Third Rationality of Information Systems , 1998, MIS Q..

[19]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Institutional Factors in Information Technology Innovation , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  K. V. Andersen EDI and Data Networking in the Public Sector , 1998 .

[21]  Jan Damsgaard,et al.  International Trade at the Speed of Light: Building an Electronic Trading Infrastructure in Denmark, Finland and Hong Kong , 1998 .

[22]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The Role of Intermediating Institutions in the Diffusion of Electronic Data Interchange (EDI): How Industry Associations Intervened in Denmark, Finland, and Hong Kong , 2001, Inf. Soc..

[23]  W. Siffin,et al.  Bureaucracy , 1971 .

[24]  N. Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  EDI in Europe: How It Works in Practice , 1995 .

[25]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  Organizational Transformation Using Electronic Data Interchange: The Case of TradeNet in Singapore , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[26]  G. Zaltman,et al.  Innovations and organizations , 2020, Organizational Innovation.

[27]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Measuring the Extent of EDI Usage in Complex Organizations: Strategies and Illustrative Examples , 1996, MIS Q..

[28]  R. Wolfe ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION: REVIEW, CRITIQUE AND SUGGESTED RESEARCH DIRECTIONS* , 1994 .

[29]  Jack L. Walker The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[30]  M. J. Moon The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? , 2002 .