Distinctiveness and the Perception of Facial Age

Facial ageing and caricatures 2 Abstract We applied a standard facial caricaturing algorithm to a three-dimensional representation of human heads. This algorithm sometimes produced heads that appeared \caricatured". More commonly, however, exaggerating the distinctive three-dimensional information in a face seemed to produce an increase in the apparent age of the face | both at a local level, by exaggerating small facial creases into wrinkles , and at a more global level via changes that seemed to make the underlying structure of the skull more evident. Concomitantly, de-emphasis of the distinctive three-dimensional information in a face made it appear relatively younger than the veridical and caricatured faces. More formally, face age judgements made by human observers were ordered according to the level of caricature, with anti-caricatures judged younger than veridical faces, and veridical faces judged younger than carica-tured faces. We discuss these results in terms of the importance of the nature of the features made more distinct by a caricaturing algorithm and the nature of human representation(s) of faces.

[1]  Shepherd Jw,et al.  The effect of attractiveness on recognition memory for faces. , 1973 .

[2]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[3]  Peter E. Hart,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[4]  J. B. Pittenger,et al.  Aging faces as viscal-elastic events: implications for a theory of nonrigid shape perception. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  J. B. Pittenger,et al.  Perceptual information for the age level of faces as a higher order invariant of growth. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  S Hollander,et al.  Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[7]  A. G. Goldstein,et al.  Memory for Faces and Schema Theory , 1980 .

[8]  J. B. Pittenger,et al.  Wrinkling and head shape as coordinated sources of age-level information , 1980 .

[9]  Leah L. Light,et al.  Why Attractive People are Harder to Remember , 1981 .

[10]  S. Rogers The aging skeleton : aspects of human bone involution , 1982 .

[11]  J T Todd,et al.  The perception of growth in three dimensions , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[13]  J. Todd,et al.  Describing perceptual information about human growth in terms of geometric invariants , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  R. Behrents,et al.  Growth in the aging craniofacial skeleton. , 1985 .

[15]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[16]  Shimon Ullman Analysis of visual motion by biological and computer systems , 1987 .

[17]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for mental representations of faces , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[19]  J. Gillespie Organisation and Functions of Local Authorities , 1988 .

[20]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Cooperative computation of stereo disparity , 1988 .

[21]  V. Bruce,et al.  Further experiments on the perception of growth in three dimensions , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Distinctiveness and Expertise Effects with Homogeneous Stimuli: Towards a Model of Configural Coding , 1990, Perception.

[23]  J. Langlois,et al.  Attractive Faces Are Only Average , 1990 .

[24]  D. Perrett,et al.  Perception and recognition of photographic quality facial caricatures: Implications for the recognition of natural images , 1991 .

[25]  T. Valentine The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology a Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[26]  Ian Craw,et al.  Parameterising Images for Recognition and Reconstruction , 1991 .

[27]  M. Cunningham,et al.  Article Commentary: Averaged Faces Are Attractive, but Very Attractive Faces Are Not Average , 1991 .

[28]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  CONSPEC and CONLERN: a two-process theory of infant face recognition. , 1991, Psychological review.

[29]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active shape models , 1998 .

[30]  Michael Kubovy,et al.  Caricature and face recognition , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[31]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Example Based Image Analysis and Synthesis , 1993 .

[33]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Understanding face recognition: Caricauture effects, inversion, and the homogeneity problem , 1994 .

[34]  J. Langlois,et al.  What Is Average and What Is Not Average About Attractive Faces? , 1994 .

[35]  D. Perrett,et al.  Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness , 1994, Nature.

[36]  S. Hamra Arcus Marginalis Release and Orbital Fat Preservation in Midface Rejuvenation , 1995, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[37]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Automatic interpretation of human faces and hand gestures using flexible models. , 1995 .

[38]  Sarah V. Stevenage,et al.  Can caricatures really produce distinctiveness effects , 1995 .

[39]  D. Perrett,et al.  Perception of age in adult Caucasian male faces: computer graphic manipulation of shape and colour information , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[41]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Face distinctiveness in recognition across viewpoint: an analysis of the statistical structure of face spaces , 1996, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition.

[42]  V. Bruce,et al.  Face processing: Human perception and principal components analysis , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[43]  Tomaso A. Poggio,et al.  Image Synthesis from a Single Example Image , 1996, ECCV.

[44]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Image Representations for Visual Learning , 1996, Science.

[45]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  Learning novel views to a single face image , 1996, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition.

[46]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Averageness, Exaggeration, and Facial Attractiveness , 1996 .

[47]  Thaddeus Beier,et al.  Feature-based image metamorphosis , 1998 .

[48]  Yuji Moro,et al.  Facial Asymmetry and Attractiveness Judgment in Developmental Perspective , 2001 .

[49]  W. Campbell,et al.  THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS , 2004 .