Clinical outcomes of allograft with locking compression plates for elderly four-part proximal humerus fractures

BackgroundThe aim of this study is to explore the clinical outcomes of anatomical allograft or fibula shaft augmentation with locking compression plates (LCPs) in elderly patients with four-part proximal humeral fracture (PHF).MethodsA total of 22 elderly patients with four-part PHF underwent allograft augmentation with LCPs for treatment. Among them, 7 cases received anatomical allograft and 15 patients received fibula shaft. Constant-Murley score (CMS), the disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score, and subjective ratings, radiographic imaging, range of motion (ROM), and complications were recorded as postoperative evaluations.ResultsAlthough the ROM and strength were considerably limited compared with the normal side, there were no significant differences in pain and daily activity between the unaffected and affected sides at the last follow-up according to the CMS. Additionally, no significant differences were found in the subjective ratings and CMS and DASH scores between the patients augmented with fibular shaft and anatomical allograft. Among the 15 patients who received fibular shaft, one case developed avascular necrosis (AVN) and screw cutout, but satisfactory outcomes were obtained after removal of implant. Besides, varus displacement occurred in one case, the patient acquired good function without revision. There were no infection, bone nonunion, and hardware-related complications occurred in any case.ConclusionsBoth anatomical allograft and fibula shaft with LCPs showed relatively good clinical outcomes for elderly patients with four-part PHF.

[1]  P. Giannoudis,et al.  Early management of proximal humeral fractures with hemiarthroplasty: a systematic review. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  S. Chung,et al.  Outcomes for four-part proximal humerus fractures treated with a locking compression plate and an autologous iliac bone impaction graft. , 2012, Injury.

[3]  E. Flatow,et al.  Proximal humeral fractures: prosthetic replacement. , 2013, Instructional course lectures.

[4]  R. Keller,et al.  Basic Epidemiology of Fractures of the Upper and Lower Limb among Americans over 65 Years of Age , 1996, Epidemiology.

[5]  A. Pingsmann,et al.  Resection arthroplasty of the sternoclavicular joint for the treatment of primary degenerative sternoclavicular arthritis. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  G. Singer,et al.  Reconstruction of the sternoclavicular joint in active patients with the figure-of-eight technique using hamstrings. , 2013, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[7]  H. Y. Yüksel,et al.  The Results of Nonoperative Treatment for Three- and Four-Part Fractures of the Proximal Humerus in Low-Demand Patients , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[8]  C. Court-Brown,et al.  Minimally displaced proximal humeral fracturesEpidemiology and outcome in 507 cases , 2003, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[9]  J. Abboud,et al.  Use of locking plates in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. , 2010, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[10]  J. Iannotti,et al.  Displaced Three‐ and Four‐Part Proximal Humerus Fractures: Evaluation and Management , 2000, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[11]  A. Desai,et al.  Management of proximal humerus fractures in adults. , 2014, World journal of orthopedics.

[12]  Jen-Hung Wang,et al.  Surgical treatment for proximal humeral fracture in elderly patients with emphasis on the use of intramedullary strut allografts , 2012 .

[13]  P. Clavert,et al.  Pitfalls and complications with locking plate for proximal humerus fracture. , 2010, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[14]  D. Lorich,et al.  Endosteal Strut Augment Reduces Complications Associated With Proximal Humeral Locking Plates , 2011, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

[15]  B. Feeley,et al.  Nonoperative Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Systematic Review , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[16]  Chunxi Yang,et al.  Internal fixation versus shoulder hemiarthroplasty for displaced 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. , 2012, Orthopedics.

[17]  D. Militianu,et al.  Natural history of complex fractures of the proximal humerus using a three-dimensional classification system. , 2008, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[18]  G. Walch,et al.  Nonunions of the surgical neck of the humerus: surgical treatment with an intramedullary bone peg, internal fixation, and cancellous bone grafting. , 1996, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[19]  M. Karagas,et al.  Fracture risk in the U.S. Medicare population. , 1999, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[20]  B. Kristiansen,et al.  Epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. , 1987, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[21]  A. Gutman Views on the pathogenesis and management of primary gout--1971. , 1972, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American volume.

[22]  R. Hoffmann,et al.  The treatment of proximal humeral fracture in adults. , 2013, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.

[23]  L. Lombardi,et al.  The block-bridge system: a new concept and surgical technique to reconstruct articular surfaces and tuberosities in complex proximal humeral fractures. , 2008, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.