GHG MITIGATION IN THE TRANSPORT SECTOR

Abstract This paper explores the potential for greenhouse gas mitigation in the transport sector to contribute to meeting the objective of the Framework Convention on Climate Change (FCCC). The technical potential for vehicle energy intensity reductions is found to be about 25–50%, but the economic (‘no regrets’) potential is much smaller. Renewable derived alternative fuels can reduce greenhouse gas emissions per unit of energy used by as much as 80%, but supplies are insufficient to meet current demand except at very high prices. Thus, energy intensity reductions should be the first priority. However, current trends suggest that energy intensity may not fall at all in the coming 30 years. Government policies, including feebates (a system of fuel economy related vehicle taxes and subsidies) and fuel taxes, could help to reduce transport energy intensity and traffic levels but, given available technology, current consumer preferences and lifestyles, policies that would reduce transport GHG emissions below 1990 levels would probably entail net economic costs. Governments pay much attention to developing new technology and this may be sufficient to bring about GHG emission reductions. However, technology might not provide the whole answer, and more research is needed into the possible role of developments in preference and lifestyle.

[1]  Adolf D May,et al.  THE DESIGN OF INTEGRATED TRANSPORT STRATEGIES. , 1995 .

[2]  P. Goodwin A REVIEW OF NEW DEMAND ELASTICITIES WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO SHORT AND LONG RUN EFFECTS OF PRICE CHANGES , 1992 .

[3]  R K Bose,et al.  TRANSPORT IN DELHI: ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES , 1993 .

[4]  David L. Greene,et al.  Costs and benefits of automative fuel economy improvement: A partial analysis , 1993 .

[5]  Tien Fang Fwa,et al.  A statistical study on automobile fuel consumption , 1991 .

[6]  David L. Greene,et al.  Vehicle Use and Fuel Economy: How Big is the "Rebound" Effect? , 1992 .

[7]  J DeCicco,et al.  STEERING WITH PRICES: FUEL AND VEHICLE TAXATION AS MARKET INCENTIVES FOR HIGHER FUEL ECONOMY , 1994 .

[8]  D. Greene CAFE OR PRICE?: An Analysis of the Effects of Federal Fuel Economy Regulations and Gasoline Price on New Car MPG, 1978-89 , 1990 .

[9]  J Polak,et al.  AN ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTS OF THE TRONDHEIM TOLL RING ON TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR AND THE ENVIRONMENT , 1994 .

[10]  Lee Schipper,et al.  Mind the Gap: The Vicious Circle of Measuring Automobile Fuel Use , 1993 .

[11]  John M. DeCicco,et al.  AN UPDATED ASSESSMENT OF THE NEAR-TERM POTENTIAL FOR IMPROVING AUTOMOTIVE FUEL ECONOMY , 1993 .

[12]  B. W. Ang RESTRAINING AUTOMOBILE OWNERSHIP AND USAGE AND TRANSPORTATION ENERGY DEMAND -- THE CASE OF SINGAPORE. , 1992 .

[13]  James J. MacKenzie,et al.  The Going Rate: What It Really Costs to Drive , 1992 .

[14]  H. Grieb,et al.  Pollutant Emissions of Existing and Future Engines for Commercial Aircraft , 1990 .

[15]  M. Thring World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[16]  J. Rabinovitch URBAN PUBLIC TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT IN CURITIBA, BRAZIL , 1993 .

[17]  Carmen Difglio,et al.  Cost Effectiveness of Future Fuel Economy Improvements , 1990 .

[18]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Mitigation options in the transportation sector , 1996 .

[19]  Eric J. Miller,et al.  Disaggregate analysis of the demand for gasoline , 1990 .

[20]  D. J. Martin,et al.  Energy Use and Energy Efficiency in UK Transport up to the Year 2010 , 1989 .

[21]  DeLuchi Emissions of greenhouse gases from the use of transportation fuels and electricity. Volume 2: Appendixes A--S , 1993 .

[22]  Mark A. Delucchi,et al.  Future Drive: Electric Vehicles And Sustainable Transportation , 1994 .

[23]  Peter Newman,et al.  Cities and automobile dependence , 1993 .

[24]  A. Grubler The Transportation Sector: Growing Demand and Emissions , 1993 .

[25]  H Dimitriou,et al.  Urban Transport Planning: A Developmental Approach , 1992 .

[26]  R Tengstrom THE USE OF THE AUTOMOBILE: ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR MAN, SOCIETY, AND THE ENVIRONMENT , 1992 .

[27]  Robin Segal,et al.  Forecasting the Market for Electric Vehicles in California Using Conjoint Analysis , 1995 .

[28]  Clifton T. Jones Another Look at U.S. Passenger Vehicle Use and the 'Rebound' Effect from Improved Fuel Efficiency , 1993 .

[29]  Robert Joumard,et al.  EMISSIONS UNITAIRES DE POLLUANTS DES VEHICULES LEGERS , 1990 .

[30]  Kenneth Button,et al.  Environmental Externalities and Transport Policy , 1990 .