Documentation processes during the CanMars mission: Observations and recommendations for future application in analogue and planetary missions

Abstract This contribution provides and overview of the documentation process for the CanMars Mars Sample Return rover mission conducted in partnership between the Canadian Space Agency and the University of Western Ontario (Western). Documentation is a key component of planetary science missions in improving the value of data through contextualization, as well as providing lasting information on the design and outcome for post-mission analysis. Documentation of this analogue mission aimed to capture key decisions and better understand the decision-making process related to science interpretation, planning, and sample selection. In this paper we present evidence-based observations on challenges related to effective documentation in analogue and planetary science missions. Based on a review of documentation data and debrief sessions between documentarians, team leads, mission operations mangers, and primary investigators, we conclude with recommendations for future missions’ use of documentation.

[1]  David W. Beaty,et al.  Science Priorities for Mars Sample Return , 2008 .

[2]  Gordon R. Osinski,et al.  CanMars mission Science Team operational results: Implications for operations and the sample selection process for Mars Sample Return (MSR) , 2019, Planetary and Space Science.

[3]  L. Messeri Placing Outer Space: An Earthly Ethnography of Other Worlds , 2016 .

[4]  Phillip K. Tompkins,et al.  Organizational Communication Imperatives: Lessons of the Space Program , 1992 .

[5]  Jennifer Newman,et al.  Exploring new models for improving planetary rover operations efficiency through the 2016 CanMars Mars Sample Return (MSR) analogue deployment , 2019 .

[6]  Sanjeev Khanna,et al.  Data Provenance: Some Basic Issues , 2000, FSTTCS.

[7]  Dong Zhou,et al.  A mission execution decision making methodology based on mission-health interrelationship analysis , 2016, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[8]  Alonso H. Vera,et al.  Collaborative knowledge management supporting mars mission scientists , 2004, CSCW.

[9]  Gordon R. Osinski,et al.  The use of GIS, mapping, and immersive technologies in the CanMars Mars Sample Return analogue mission; advantages for science interpretation and operational decision-making , 2019 .

[10]  Bhavani Shankar,et al.  A Mission Control Architecture for robotic lunar sample return as field tested in an analogue deployment to the sudbury impact structure , 2012 .

[11]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  Uncovering Uncertainty through Disagreement , 2016 .

[12]  Mark S. Robinson,et al.  Soviet lunar sample return missions: Landing site identification and geologic context , 2012 .

[13]  T. C. Stein,et al.  PDS Analyst's Notebook for MSL and MER: Interface Update and Image Drawing Tools , 2016 .

[14]  Janet Vertesi,et al.  Seeing Like a Rover: How Robots, Teams, and Images Craft Knowledge of Mars , 2015 .

[15]  Alonso H. Vera,et al.  What Changes When a Large Team Becomes More Expert? Analyses of Speedup in the Mars Exploration Rovers Science Planning Process , 2006 .

[16]  E. Cloutis,et al.  The CanMars Mars Sample Return analogue mission , 2019, Planetary and Space Science.

[17]  Dean Eppler,et al.  Comparing Apollo and Mars Exploration Rover (MER)/phoenix operations paradigms for human exploration during NASA Desert-RATS science operations , 2013 .

[18]  Robert R. Downs,et al.  The importance of data set provenance for science , 2015 .