Flexural-torsional buckling tests of cold-formed steel compression members at elevated temperatures

Current design standards do not provide adequate guidelines for the fire design of cold-formed steel compression members subject to flexural-torsional buckling. Eurocode 3 Part 1.2 (2005) recommends the same fire design guidelines for both hot-rolled and cold-formed steel compression members subject to flexural-torsional buckling although considerable behavioural differences exist between cold-formed and hot-rolled steel members. Past research has recommended the use of ambient temperature cold-formed steel design rules for the fire design of cold-formed steel compression members provided appropriately reduced mechanical properties are used at elevated temperatures. To assess the accuracy of flexural-torsional buckling design rules in both ambient temperature cold-formed steel design and fire design standards, an experimental study of slender cold-formed steel compression members was undertaken at both ambient and elevated temperatures. This paper presents the details of this experimental study, its results, and their comparison with the predictions from the current design rules. It was found that the current ambient temperature design rules are conservative while the fire design rules are overly conservative. Suitable recommendations have been made in relation to the currently available design rules for flexural-torsional buckling including methods of improvement. Most importantly, this paper has addressed the lack of experimental results for slender cold-formed steel columns at elevated temperatures.

[1]  Kuo-Chen Yang,et al.  Performance of steel H columns loaded under uniform temperature , 2006 .

[2]  J M Davies,et al.  Structural behaviour of cold-formed thin-walled short steel channel columns at elevated temperatures. Part 2: Design calculations and numerical analysis , 2003 .

[3]  Yong Wang,et al.  Structural behaviour of cold-formed thin-walled short steel channel columns at elevated temperatures. Part 1: experiments , 2003 .

[4]  Jean-Marc Franssen,et al.  A simple model for the fire resistance of axially loaded members—comparison with experimental results , 1996 .

[5]  Yong Wang,et al.  An experimental study of non-sway loaded and rotationally restrained steel column assemblies under fire conditions: analysis of test results and design calculations , 2003 .

[6]  Mahen Mahendran,et al.  Experimental study of the mechanical properties of light gauge cold-formed steels at elevated temperatures , 2009 .

[7]  Ben Young,et al.  Experimental investigation of cold-formed steel material at elevated temperatures , 2007 .

[8]  Faris Ali,et al.  Structural performance of rotationally restrained steel columns in fire , 2001 .

[9]  J. M. Davies,et al.  A numerical imperfection sensitivity study of cold-formed thin-walled tubular steel columns at uniform elevated temperatures , 2004 .

[10]  Ian Burgess,et al.  Failure of steel columns in fire , 1992 .

[11]  Anders Ranby.  Structural fire design of thin walled steel sections , 1998 .

[12]  Mahen Mahendran,et al.  Distortional buckling tests of cold-formed steel compression members at elevated temperatures , 2009 .

[13]  Mahen Mahendran,et al.  Mechanical properties of cold-formed steels at elevated temperatures , 2011 .

[14]  Ben Young,et al.  Cold-formed steel lipped channel columns at elevated temperatures , 2006 .

[15]  Jean-Marc Franssen,et al.  Numerical simulation of a full scale fire test on a loaded steel framework , 1995 .

[16]  J. M. Davies,et al.  Axial strength of cold-formed thin-walled steel channels under non-uniform temperatures in fire , 2003 .

[17]  Yong Wang,et al.  Fire tests of non-sway loaded and rotationally restrained steel column assemblies , 2003 .

[18]  Mahen Mahendran,et al.  Numerical modelling of light gauge cold-formed steel compression members subjected to distortional buckling at elevated temperatures , 2010 .

[19]  Jean-Marc Franssen,et al.  Stability of Steel Columns in Case of Fire: Numerical Modeling , 1997 .