Continuous evaluation of evolving behavioral intervention technologies.

Behavioral intervention technologies (BITs) are web-based and mobile interventions intended to support patients and consumers in changing behaviors related to health, mental health, and well-being. BITs are provided to patients and consumers in clinical care settings and commercial marketplaces, frequently with little or no evaluation. Current evaluation methods, including RCTs and implementation studies, can require years to validate an intervention. This timeline is fundamentally incompatible with the BIT environment, where technology advancement and changes in consumer expectations occur quickly, necessitating rapidly evolving interventions. However, BITs can routinely and iteratively collect data in a planned and strategic manner and generate evidence through systematic prospective analyses, thereby creating a system that can "learn." A methodologic framework, Continuous Evaluation of Evolving Behavioral Intervention Technologies (CEEBIT), is proposed that can support the evaluation of multiple BITs or evolving versions, eliminating those that demonstrate poorer outcomes, while allowing new BITs to be entered at any time. CEEBIT could be used to ensure the effectiveness of BITs provided through deployment platforms in clinical care organizations or BIT marketplaces. The features of CEEBIT are described, including criteria for the determination of inferiority, determination of BIT inclusion, methods of assigning consumers to BITs, definition of outcomes, and evaluation of the usefulness of the system. CEEBIT offers the potential to collapse initial evaluation and postmarketing surveillance, providing ongoing assurance of safety and efficacy to patients and consumers, payers, and policymakers.

[1]  David R. Holtgrave,et al.  Alternatives to the randomized controlled trial. , 2008, American journal of public health.

[2]  W. R. Thompson ON THE LIKELIHOOD THAT ONE UNKNOWN PROBABILITY EXCEEDS ANOTHER IN VIEW OF THE EVIDENCE OF TWO SAMPLES , 1933 .

[3]  Choton Basu,et al.  Disrupting Class How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns , 2009 .

[4]  Lorien C Abroms,et al.  iPhone apps for smoking cessation: a content analysis. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[5]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Behavior Wizard: A Method for Matching Target Behaviors with Solutions , 2010, PERSUASIVE.

[6]  E. Guadagnoli,et al.  Patient participation in decision-making. , 1998, Social science & medicine.

[7]  H. Robbins,et al.  Selecting the highest probability in binomial or multinomial trials. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  B. Rounsaville,et al.  A Stage Model of Behavioral Therapies Research: Getting Started and Moving on From Stage I , 2006 .

[9]  D. Mohr,et al.  Behavioral intervention technologies: evidence review and recommendations for future research in mental health. , 2013, General hospital psychiatry.

[10]  Bruce Neal,et al.  A Systematic Review of the Impact of Adherence on the Effectiveness of e-Therapies , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[11]  L. Swartz,et al.  Scaling Up mHealth: Where Is the Evidence? , 2013, PLoS medicine.

[12]  H Robbins,et al.  Clinical and prophylactic trials with assured new treatment for those at greater risk: II. Examples. , 1996, American journal of public health.

[13]  T. Shakespeare,et al.  Observational Studies , 2003 .

[14]  S. Hollon,et al.  Defining empirically supported therapies. , 1998, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[15]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[16]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[17]  Ying Kuen Cheung,et al.  DOPA-RESPONSIVE DYSTONIC CAMPTOCORMIA , 2006, Neurology.

[18]  E. Balas,et al.  Managing Clinical Knowledge for Health Care Improvement , 2000, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[19]  H. Robbins,et al.  Clinical and prophylactic trials with assured new treatment for those at greater risk: I. A design proposal. , 1996, American journal of public health.

[20]  A. Jadad,et al.  What Is eHealth (3): A Systematic Review of Published Definitions , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[21]  Mitsunori Ogihara,et al.  Partnerships for the Design, Conduct, and Analysis of Effectiveness, and Implementation Research: Experiences of the Prevention Science and Methodology Group , 2012, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[22]  Naihua Duan,et al.  Design of implementation studies for quality improvement programs: an effectiveness-cost-effectiveness framework. , 2014, American journal of public health.

[23]  J. Lieberman,et al.  The National Institute of Mental Health Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) project: schizophrenia trial design and protocol development. , 2003, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[24]  Ying Kuen Cheung,et al.  Simple Sequential Boundaries for Treatment Selection in Multi‐Armed Randomized Clinical Trials with a Control , 2008, Biometrics.

[25]  C. Brewin,et al.  Patient preferences and randomised clinical trials. , 1989, BMJ.

[26]  L. J. Wei,et al.  The Randomized Play-the-Winner Rule in Medical Trials , 1978 .

[27]  Audie A Atienza,et al.  Mobile health technology evaluation: the mHealth evidence workshop. , 2013, American journal of preventive medicine.

[28]  D. Kupfer,et al.  Strengthening clinical effectiveness trials: Equipoise-stratified randomization , 2001, Biological Psychiatry.

[29]  D. Rubin,et al.  Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score , 1984 .

[30]  H. Christensen,et al.  Adherence in Internet Interventions for Anxiety and Depression: Systematic Review , 2009, Journal of medical Internet research.

[31]  Peter F Thall,et al.  Continuous Bayesian adaptive randomization based on event times with covariates , 2006, Statistics in medicine.