The energetic cost of induced fit catalysis: Crystal structures of trypsinogen mutants with enhanced activity and inhibitor affinity

The contribution of induced fit to enzyme specificity has been much debated, although with little experimental data. Here we probe the effect of induced fit on enzyme specificity using the trypsin(ogen) system. BPTI is known to induce trypsinogen to assume a trypsinlike conformation. Correlations are observed between BPTI affinity and the values of kcat/Km for the hydrolysis of two substrates by eight trypsin(ogen) variants. The slope of both correlations is −1.8. The crystal structures of the BPTI complexes of four variant trypsinogens were also solved. Three of these enzymes, K15A, ΔI16V17/D194N, and ΔI16V17/Q156K trypsinogen, are 10‐ to 100‐fold more active than trypsinogen. The fourth variant, ΔI16V17 trypsinogen, is the lone outlier in the correlations; its activity is lower than expected based on its affinity for BPTI. The S1 site and oxyanion hole, formed by segments 184A–194 and 216–223, are trypsinlike in all of the enzymes. These structural and kinetic data confirm that BPTI induces an active conformation in the trypsin(ogen) variants. Thus, changes in BPTI affinity monitor changes in the energetic cost of inducing a trypsinlike conformation. Although the S1 site and oxyanion hole are similar in all four variants, the N‐terminal and autolysis loop (residues 142–152) segments have different interactions for each variant. These results indicate that zymogen activity is controled by a simple conformational equilibrium between active and inactive conformations, and that the autolysis loop and N‐terminal segments control this equilibrium. Together, these data illustrate that induced fit does not generally contribute to enzyme specificity.

[1]  J. Hanson,et al.  Phosphonate analogues of carboxypeptidase A substrates are potent transition-state analogue inhibitors. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[2]  A. Fersht Enzyme structure and mechanism , 1977 .

[3]  J. Sambrook,et al.  The single-chain form of tissue-type plasminogen activator has catalytic activity: studies with a mutant enzyme that lacks the cleavage site. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[4]  J. Thornton,et al.  PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures , 1993 .

[5]  K. Brady,et al.  Inhibition of chymotrypsin by peptidyl trifluoromethyl ketones: determinants of slow-binding kinetics. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[6]  Daniel Herschlag,et al.  The role of induced fit and conformational changes of enzymes in specificity and catalysis , 1988 .

[7]  D. Koshland Application of a Theory of Enzyme Specificity to Protein Synthesis. , 1958, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  W. Rutter,et al.  Transition-state characterization: a new approach combining inhibitor analogues and variation in enzyme structure. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[9]  R. Huber,et al.  Crystal structure of bovine trypsinogen at 1-8 A resolution. II. Crystallographic refinement, refined crystal structure and comparison with bovine trypsin. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  J. Zou,et al.  Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. , 1991, Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography.

[11]  M. Karplus,et al.  Crystallographic R Factor Refinement by Molecular Dynamics , 1987, Science.

[12]  A. Berger,et al.  On the size of the active site in proteases. I. Papain. , 1967, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[13]  A. Brünger Free R value: a novel statistical quantity for assessing the accuracy of crystal structures , 1992, Nature.

[14]  P. Bartlett,et al.  Phosphonamidates as transition-state analogue inhibitors of thermolysin. , 1983, Biochemistry.

[15]  R. Fletterick,et al.  Crystal structures of rat anionic trypsin complexed with the protein inhibitors APPI and BPTI. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  M Bolognesi,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of the complex between pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor (Kazal type) and trypsinogen at 1.8 A resolution. Structure solution, crystallographic refinement and preliminary structural interpretation. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  D. Ringe,et al.  Comparison of anionic and cationic trypsinogens: The anionic activation domain is more flexible in solution and differs in its mode of BPTI binding in the crystal structure , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[18]  M. Lazdunski,et al.  Trypsin-pancreatic trypsin inhibitor association. Dynamics of the interaction and role of disulfide bridges. , 1972, Biochemistry.

[19]  T. Lin,et al.  Activating a zymogen without proteolytic processing: mutation of Lys15 and Asn194 activates trypsinogen. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[20]  R. Huber,et al.  Induction of the bovine trypsinogen—trypsin transition by peptides sequentially similar to the N‐terminus of trypsin , 1976, FEBS letters.

[21]  P. Kraulis A program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures , 1991 .

[22]  R. Huber,et al.  Structural basis of the activation and action of trypsin , 1978 .

[23]  W. Rutter,et al.  Converting trypsin to chymotrypsin: residue 172 is a substrate specificity determinant. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[24]  R J Read,et al.  Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. , 1998, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[25]  L. Hedstrom,et al.  The roles of conserved carboxylate residues in IMP dehydrogenase and identification of a transition state analog. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[26]  A. Warshel Electrostatic Origin of the Catalytic Power of Enzymes and the Role of Preorganized Active Sites* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  R. Huber,et al.  Lysine 156 promotes the anomalous proenzyme activity of tPA: X‐ray crystal structure of single‐chain human tPA , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[28]  S. Benkovic,et al.  Solvation, Reorganization Energy, and Biological Catalysis* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  H. Lipson Crystal Structures , 1949, Nature.

[30]  T. Lin,et al.  Hydrophobic interactions control zymogen activation in the trypsin family of serine proteases. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[31]  W. Rutter,et al.  Converting trypsin to chymotrypsin: the role of surface loops. , 1992, Science.

[32]  R. Stroud,et al.  Structure of bovine trypsinogen at 1.9 A resolution. , 1977, Biochemistry.

[33]  C. Post,et al.  Reexamination of induced fit as a determinant of substrate specificity in enzymatic reactions. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[34]  A. Fersht,et al.  Catalysis, binding and enzyme-substrate complementarity , 1974, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[35]  Axel T. Brunger,et al.  Model bias in macromolecular crystal structures , 1992 .