Performance study of Kalman filter controller for multiconjugate adaptive optics.

We compare the performance of the Kalman filter (KF)-based and the minimum variance (MV) control algorithms for a zonal adaptive optics with a phase temporal prediction step included for effective compensation of the errors attributable to latencies in the system. The main goal is to evaluate the performance achievable by the computationally more expensive KF approach, which explicitly accounts for the atmospheric turbulence temporal behavior through a first-order autoregressive evolution model, and the simpler MV algorithm, with and without temporal prediction. For a representative example, the Gemini-South 8 m telescope multiconjugate adaptive optics system performance of the KF and the MV controllers has been compared with respect to their turbulence compensation capability. We show that the KF algorithm, as expected, shows superior performance to that of the MV algorithm, especially for extremely low sampling rates and large control latencies. We also show that for moderate control latencies the MV algorithm with a temporal prediction step added to it approaches the performance of the KF technique.

[1]  Brent L Ellerbroek,et al.  Efficient computation of minimum-variance wave-front reconstructors with sparse matrix techniques. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[2]  E. P. Wallner Optimal wave-front correction using slope measurements , 1983 .

[3]  R. Hudgin Wave-front compensation error due to finite corrector-element size , 1977 .

[4]  Luc Gilles,et al.  Robustness study of the pseudo open-loop controller for multiconjugate adaptive optics. , 2005, Applied optics.

[5]  Laurent M. Mugnier,et al.  Optimal control law for multiconjugate adaptive optics , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[6]  Brent L. Ellerbroek,et al.  Simulations of closed-loop wavefront reconstruction for multiconjugate adaptive optics on giant telescopes , 2003, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[7]  Brent L. Ellerbroek,et al.  Real-time adaptive optimization of wavefront reconstruction algorithms for closed-loop adaptive optical systems , 1998, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[8]  L M Mugnier,et al.  Optimal wave-front reconstruction strategies for multiconjugate adaptive optics. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[9]  Claire E. Max,et al.  A geometric view of adaptive optics control: boiling atmosphere model , 2004, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[10]  Donald T. Gavel Suppressing anomalous localized waffle behavior in least-squares wavefront reconstructors , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[11]  M. le Louarn,et al.  Analysis of modes and behavior of a multiconjugate adaptive optics system. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[12]  Curtis R Vogel,et al.  Multigrid preconditioned conjugate-gradient method for large-scale wave-front reconstruction. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[13]  R. Paschall,et al.  Linear quadratic Gaussian control of a deformable mirror adaptive optics system with time-delayed measurements. , 1993, Applied optics.