Review of Pedestrian Level of Service: Perspective in Developing Countries

Analyses of pedestrian-related issues have been gaining much attention from researchers in recent years, particularly studies of pedestrian safety and pedestrian level of service (LOS) in developing countries. The focus for evaluating pedestrian LOS has shifted from quantitative methods to qualitative methods and factors to be considered have been changing. Crosswalks (namely, signalized, unsignalized, and midblock) are complex locations because of the interaction of pedestrians with the vehicle flow. Pedestrian LOS at crosswalks is quite different from that on sidewalks. A measure of effectiveness (MOE) is usually adopted for evaluation of pedestrian facilities, and the MOE changes with the type of facility. Pedestrian delay and space at the corner are considered as MOEs for signalized intersections. The MOE might depend on pedestrian safety, delay, available vehicle gaps (crossing difficulty), and behavior of pedestrians as well as that of vehicle drivers at unprotected midblock crosswalks. This study sought to identify the importance of pedestrian LOS in the context of developing countries, particularly at unprotected midblock crosswalks. To achieve this objective, a review of the literature was carried out on the pedestrian LOS at various facilities such as the sidewalk, intersection, and midblock crosswalk. The review highlighted the need for further pedestrian LOS studies at various facilities under mixed traffic.

[1]  William H. K. Lam,et al.  Simulating pedestrian movements at signalized crosswalks in Hong Kong , 2008 .

[2]  Miles Tight,et al.  A comparison of three methods for assessing the walkability of the pedestrian environment , 2011 .

[3]  Richard Tay,et al.  Personal space, evasive movement and pedestrian level of service , 2014 .

[4]  Sally Jensen,et al.  Pedestrian and Bicyclist Level of Service on Roadway Segments , 2007 .

[5]  Satish Chandra,et al.  Pedestrian Flow Characteristics in Mixed Traffic Conditions , 2010 .

[6]  Luis Ferreira,et al.  A methodology for determining equivalent factors in heterogeneous pedestrian flows , 2013, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[7]  Hiroshi Tsukaguchi,et al.  A new method for evaluation of level of service in pedestrian facilities , 1987 .

[8]  Allan F Williams,et al.  Pedestrian crashes in Washington, DC and Baltimore. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Prianka N. Seneviratne,et al.  Level of Service on Pedestrian Facilities , 1985 .

[10]  Michael R. Baltes,et al.  Pedestrian Level of Service for Midblock Street Crossings , 2002 .

[11]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  Right Turns on Green and Pedestrian Level of Service: Statistical Assessment , 2009 .

[12]  Abishai Polus,et al.  Pedestrian Flow and Level of Service , 1983 .

[13]  P. Vedagiri,et al.  Evaluation of pedestrian crosswalk level of service (LOS) in perspective of type of land-use , 2015 .

[14]  Darcy M. Bullock,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Turning Vehicles on Pedestrian Level of Service at Signalized Intersections , 2007 .

[15]  Y Tanaboriboon,et al.  Level-of-service standards for pedestrian facilities in bangkok: a case study , 1989 .

[16]  Nazmul Sohel,et al.  Increased Childhood Mortality and Arsenic in Drinking Water in Matlab, Bangladesh: A Population-Based Cohort Study , 2013, PloS one.

[17]  Kardi Teknomo,et al.  Application of microscopic pedestrian simulation model , 2006 .

[18]  Michael Carreno,et al.  Quality of Service for Pedestrians: Closing the Gaps in Knowledge , 2002 .

[19]  William H. K. Lam,et al.  New Level-of-Service Standard for Signalized Crosswalks with Bi-Directional Pedestrian Flows , 2005 .

[20]  Wael K.M. Alhajyaseen,et al.  Effects of Bi-directional Pedestrian Flow Characteristics upon the Capacity of Signalized Crosswalks , 2011 .

[21]  William H. K. Lam,et al.  Levels of Service for Stairway in Hong Kong Underground Stations , 2003 .

[22]  Per E Gårder,et al.  The impact of speed and other variables on pedestrian safety in Maine. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  Mehdi Moeinaddini,et al.  Non-motorised Level of Service: Addressing Challenges in Pedestrian and Bicycle Level of Service , 2013 .

[24]  Suely da Penha Sanches,et al.  PROPOSAL OF A SIDEWALK ACCESSIBILITY INDEX , 2007 .

[25]  Wael K.M. Alhajyaseen,et al.  Quality of pedestrian flow and crosswalk width at signalized intersections , 2010 .

[26]  Theodore Anton Petritsch,et al.  Multimodal Level of Service for Urban Streets , 2008 .

[27]  J. Pucher,et al.  Urban Transport Trends and Policies in China and India: Impacts of Rapid Economic Growth , 2007 .

[28]  Mohamed Shahin Pedestrian behaviour with mixed traffic in developing countries , 2006 .

[29]  Theodore Anton Petritsch,et al.  Level-of-Service Model for Pedestrians at Signalized Intersections , 2005 .

[30]  William H. K. Lam,et al.  Pedestrian speed/flow relationships for walking facilities in Hong Kong , 2000 .

[31]  C Henson Levels of service for pedestrians , 2000 .

[32]  Tobias Kretz,et al.  A level of service scheme for microscopic simulation of pedestrians that integrates queuing, uni-and multi-directional flow situations , 2011 .

[33]  Mehdi Moeinaddini,et al.  Disabled Pedestrian Level of Service Method for Evaluating and Promoting Inclusive Walking Facilities on Urban Streets , 2013 .

[34]  Seiichi Kagaya,et al.  METHOD TO DETERMINE PEDESTRIAN LEVEL-OF-SERVICE FOR CROSSWALKS AT URBAN INTERSECTIONS , 2005 .

[35]  Seiichi Kagaya,et al.  METHOD TO DETERMINE OVERALL LEVEL-OF-SERVICE OF PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS BASED ON TOTAL UTILITY VALUE , 2005 .