SERAPHIN haemodynamic substudy: the effect of the dual endothelin receptor antagonist macitentan on haemodynamic parameters and NT-proBNP levels and their association with disease progression in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension

Aims The effect of macitentan on haemodynamic parameters and NT-proBNP levels was evaluated in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients in the SERAPHIN study. Association between these parameters and disease progression, assessed by the primary endpoint (time to first morbidity/mortality event), was explored. Methods and results Of the 742 randomized patients, 187 with right heart catheterization at baseline and month 6 participated in a haemodynamic sub-study. Prespecified endpoints included change from baseline to month 6 in cardiac index (CI), right atrial pressure (RAP), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), mixed-venous oxygen saturation, and NT-proBNP. Exploratory analyses examined associations between CI, RAP, and NT-proBNP and disease progression using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models. Macitentan improved CI, RAP, mPAP, PVR and NT-proBNP vs. placebo at month 6. Absolute levels of CI, RAP and NT-proBNP at baseline and month 6, but not their changes, were associated with morbidity/mortality events. Patients with CI > 2.5 L/min/m2, RAP < 8 mmHg, or NT-proBNP < 750 fmol/ml at month 6 had a lower risk of morbidity/mortality than those not meeting these thresholds (HR 0.49, 95% CL 0.28–0.86; HR 0.72, 95% CL 0.42–1.22; and HR 0.22, 95% CL 0.15–0.33, respectively). Conclusions For all treatment groups, baseline and month 6 values of CI, RAP, and NT-proBNP, but not their changes, were associated with morbidity/mortality events, confirming their relevance in predicting disease progression in patients with PAH. By improving those parameters, macitentan increased the likelihood of reaching threshold values associated with lower risk of morbidity/mortality.

[1]  Simon Gibbs,et al.  2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension. , 2016, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[2]  O. Sitbon,et al.  Treatment goals of pulmonary hypertension. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  W. Seeger,et al.  Short-Term Improvement in Pulmonary Hemodynamics is Strongly Predictive of Long-Term Survival in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension , 2013, Pulmonary circulation.

[4]  Z. Jing,et al.  Macitentan and morbidity and mortality in pulmonary arterial hypertension. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  A. Peacock,et al.  Predicting survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension in the UK , 2012, European Respiratory Journal.

[6]  J. Barberà,et al.  Survival in pulmonary hypertension in Spain: insights from the Spanish registry , 2012, European Respiratory Journal.

[7]  T. Welte,et al.  The prognostic impact of follow-up assessments in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension , 2011, European Respiratory Journal.

[8]  Christopher S Coffey,et al.  Predicting Survival in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Insights From the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management (REVEAL) , 2010, Circulation.

[9]  M. Humbert,et al.  Survival in Patients With Idiopathic, Familial, and Anorexigen-Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in the Modern Management Era , 2010, Circulation.

[10]  Sanjiv J. Shah,et al.  Survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a reappraisal of the NIH risk stratification equation , 2009, European Respiratory Journal.

[11]  D. Ivy,et al.  Brain natriuretic peptide levels in managing pediatric patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. , 2009, Chest.

[12]  J. Marcus,et al.  NT-proBNP reflects right ventricular structure and function in pulmonary hypertension , 2006, European Respiratory Journal.

[13]  A. Torbicki,et al.  Serum N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide as a prognostic parameter in patients with pulmonary hypertension. , 2006, Chest.

[14]  K. Chin,et al.  The right ventricle in pulmonary hypertension , 2005, Coronary artery disease.

[15]  T. Mueller,et al.  Comparison of the Biomedica NT-proBNP enzyme immunoassay and the Roche NT-proBNP chemiluminescence immunoassay: implications for the prediction of symptomatic and asymptomatic structural heart disease. , 2003, Clinical chemistry.

[16]  Gilles Garcia,et al.  Long-term intravenous epoprostenol infusion in primary pulmonary hypertension: prognostic factors and survival. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  K. Kangawa,et al.  Plasma brain natriuretic peptide as a prognostic indicator in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. , 2000, Circulation.

[18]  Keith McNeil,et al.  International guidelines for the selection of lung transplant candidates. The American Society for Transplant Physicians (ASTP)/American Thoracic Society(ATS)/European Respiratory Society(ERS)/International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation(ISHLT). , 1998, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.