Cost analysis of nurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care: evidence from a randomised controlled trial

Abstract Objective: To undertake an economic evaluation of nurse telephone consultation using decision support software in comparison with usual general practice care provided by a general practice cooperative. Design: Cost analysis from an NHS perspective using stochastic data from a randomised controlled trial. Setting: General practice cooperative with 55 general practitioners serving 97 000 registered patients in Wiltshire, England. Subjects: All patients contacting the service, or about whom the service was contacted during the trial year (January 1997 to January 1998). Main outcome measures: Costs and savings to the NHS during the trial year. Results: The cost of providing nurse telephone consultation was £81 237 per annum. This, however, determined a £94 422 reduction of other costs for the NHS arising from reduced emergency admissions to hospital. Using point estimates for savings, the cost analysis, combined with the analysis of outcomes, showed a dominance situation for the intervention over general practice cooperative care alone. If a larger improvement in outcomes is assumed (upper 95% confidence limit) NHS savings increase to £123 824 per annum. Savings of only £3728 would, however, arise in a scenario where lower 95% confidence limits for outcome differences were observed. To break even, the intervention would have needed to save 138 emergency hospital admissions per year, around 90% of the effect achieved in the trial. Additional savings of £16 928 for general practice arose from reduced travel to visit patients at home and fewer surgery appointments within three days of a call. Conclusions: Nurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care may reduce NHS costs in the long term by reducing demand for emergency admission to hospital. General practitioners currently bear most of the cost of nurse telephone consultation and benefit least from the savings associated with it. This indicates that the service produces benefits in terms of service quality, which are beyond the reach of this cost analysis.

[1]  S. Wilson.  Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes , 1987 .

[2]  R. Cooley,et al.  A ''Ready Reckoner'' for Staff Costs in the NHS, Volume I, Estimated Costs , 1998 .

[3]  M. Roland,et al.  Comparison of out of hours care provided by patients' own general practitioners and commercial deputising services: a randomised controlled trial. II: the outcome of care , 1997, BMJ.

[4]  Joanne Turnbull,et al.  Safety and effectiveness of nurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care: randomised controlled trial , 1998 .

[5]  A Briggs,et al.  Uncertainty in the economic evaluation of health care technologies: the role of sensitivity analysis. , 1994, Health economics.

[6]  M. Moore.  Nurse telephone triage in out of hours primary care: a pilot study , 1997 .

[7]  S G Thompson,et al.  Analysis and interpretation of cost data in randomised controlled trials: review of published studies , 1998, BMJ.

[8]  A. LaMotte,et al.  The role of the triage nurse practitioner in general medical practice: an analysis of the role. , 1999, Clinical excellence for nurse practitioners : the international journal of NPACE.

[9]  M. H. Wolf,et al.  Parent Satisfaction With Children's Medical Care: Development, Field Test, and Validation of a Questionnaire , 1986, Medical care.

[10]  T O Jefferson,et al.  Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ , 1996, BMJ.

[11]  K Y Liang,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. , 1986, Biometrics.

[12]  M. Palmer.  Clinical Trials: A Practical Approach , 1985 .

[13]  J A Lewis,et al.  Trials to assess equivalence: the importance of rigorous methods , 1996, BMJ.

[14]  Beverly Ekkens.  Cost-Effectiveness: A Primer , 1985 .

[15]  G. Richardson,et al.  Fewer doctors? More nurses? A review of the knowledge base of doctor-nurse substitution , 1995 .

[16]  A Briggs,et al.  Confidence intervals or surfaces? Uncertainty on the cost-effectiveness plane. , 1998, Health economics.

[17]  J. E. Brazier,et al.  Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. , 1992, BMJ.

[18]  Robert Boyce Sweeney.  An inquiry into the use of mathematical models to facilitate the analysis and interpretation of cost data , 1960 .

[19]  D. Heaney,et al.  A comparison of a Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) against two established satisfaction scales as an outcome measure of primary care consultations. , 1998, Family practice.

[20]  R Jankowski,et al.  What do hospital admission rates say about primary care? , 1999, BMJ.

[21]  Helen Smith,et al.  Observational study of a general practice out of hours cooperative: measures of activity , 1997, BMJ.

[22]  James Munro,et al.  Evaluation of NHS Direct first wave sites Second interim report to the Department of Health , 1998 .

[23]  D G Cook,et al.  Explaining variation in hospital admission rates between general practices: cross sectional study , 1999, BMJ.