Morpho morphometrics: Shared ancestry and selection drive the evolution of wing size and shape in Morpho butterflies

Butterfly wings harbor highly diverse phenotypes and are involved in many functions. Wing size and shape result from interactions between adaptive processes, phylogenetic history, and developmental constraints, which are complex to disentangle. Here, we focus on the genus Morpho (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae, 30 species), which presents a high diversity of sizes, shapes, and color patterns. First, we generate a comprehensive molecular phylogeny of these 30 species. Next, using 911 collection specimens, we quantify the variation of wing size and shape across species, to assess the importance of shared ancestry, microhabitat use, and sexual selection in the evolution of the wings. While accounting for phylogenetic and allometric effects, we detect a significant difference in wing shape but not size among microhabitats. Fore and hindwings covary at the individual and species levels, and the covariation differs among microhabitats. However, the microhabitat structure in covariation disappears when phylogenetic relationships are taken into account. Our results demonstrate that microhabitat has driven wing shape evolution, although it has not strongly affected forewing and hindwing integration. We also found that sexual dimorphism of forewing shape and color pattern are coupled, suggesting a common selective force.

[1]  Luke J. Harmon,et al.  GEIGER: investigating evolutionary radiations , 2008, Bioinform..

[2]  N. Wahlberg,et al.  Diversification of Morpho butterflies (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae): a re‐evaluation of morphological characters and new insight from DNA sequence data , 2012 .

[3]  P. Brakefield,et al.  Female choice depends on size but not symmetry of dorsal eyespots in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  G. Fernández,et al.  VARIATION IN THE WING MORPHOLOGY OF WESTERN SANDPIPERS (CALIDRIS MAURI) IN RELATION TO SEX, AGE CLASS, AND ANNUAL CYCLE , 2007 .

[5]  Y. Escoufier LE TRAITEMENT DES VARIABLES VECTORIELLES , 1973 .

[6]  John H Werren,et al.  Evolution of Shape by Multiple Regulatory Changes to a Growth Gene , 2012, Science.

[7]  H. Nijhout,et al.  Two insulin receptors determine alternative wing morphs in planthoppers , 2015, Nature.

[8]  S. Carroll,et al.  Pattern formation and eyespot determination in butterfly wings. , 1994, Science.

[9]  P. Aerts,et al.  Does flight morphology relate to flight performance? An experimental test with the butterfly **Pararge aegeria** , 2002 .

[10]  C. Klingenberg,et al.  Inferring Developmental Modularity from Morphological Integration: Analysis of Individual Variation and Asymmetry in Bumblebee Wings , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[11]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Aerodynamic evaluation of four butterfly species for the design of flapping-gliding robotic insects , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[12]  H. Sheets,et al.  A combined landmark and outline-based approach to ontogenetic shape change in the Ordovician trilobite Triarthrus becki , 2004 .

[13]  M. Suchard,et al.  Bayesian Phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7 , 2012, Molecular biology and evolution.

[14]  W. Meissner,et al.  Wing shape and migration in shorebirds: a comparative study , 2015 .

[15]  Casper J Breuker,et al.  Functional evo-devo. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[16]  Hind Wing Shape Evolves Faster than Front Wing Shape in Calopteryx Damselflies , 2012, Evolutionary Biology.

[17]  R. Dudley The Biomechanics of Insect Flight , 2018 .

[18]  D. Outlaw Morphological evolution of some migratory Ficedula flycatchers , 2011 .

[19]  D. Kemp,et al.  CONDITION DEPENDENCE, QUANTITATIVE GENETICS, AND THE POTENTIAL SIGNAL CONTENT OF IRIDESCENT ULTRAVIOLET BUTTERFLY COLORATION , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  Camilo Salazar,et al.  Chromosomal rearrangements maintain a polymorphic supergene controlling butterfly mimicry , 2011, Nature.

[21]  Darrell J Kemp,et al.  Female butterflies prefer males bearing bright iridescent ornamentation , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  N. Wahlberg,et al.  Genomic outposts serve the phylogenomic pioneers: designing novel nuclear markers for genomic DNA extractions of lepidoptera. , 2008, Systematic biology.

[23]  J. Rayner,et al.  Avian wingtip shape reconsidered: wingtip shape indices and morphological adaptations to migration , 1998 .

[24]  Adrian L. R. Thomas The Flight of Birds that have Wings and a Tail: Variable Geometry Expands the Envelope of Flight Performance , 1996 .

[25]  T. Garland,et al.  TESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  R. Lanfear,et al.  Partitionfinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. , 2012, Molecular biology and evolution.

[27]  N. Gompel,et al.  Emergence and Diversification of Fly Pigmentation Through Evolution of a Gene Regulatory Module , 2013, Science.

[28]  Benjamin Jantzen,et al.  Hindwings are unnecessary for flight but essential for execution of normal evasive flight in Lepidoptera , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  P. Brakefield,et al.  The genetics and evo–devo of butterfly wing patterns , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[30]  L R Monteiro,et al.  Multivariate regression models and geometric morphometrics: the search for causal factors in the analysis of shape. , 1999, Systematic biology.

[31]  R. Wootton FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY OF INSECT WINGS , 1992 .

[32]  L. Gall,et al.  A Single Origin for Nymphalid Butterfly Eyespots Followed by Widespread Loss of Associated Gene Expression , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[33]  Alison M. Sweeney,et al.  Insect communication: Polarized light as a butterfly mating signal , 2003, Nature.

[34]  J. Celis Pattern formation in the Drosophila wing: The development of the veins. , 2003 .

[35]  J. Mallet,et al.  Disruptive sexual selection against hybrids contributes to speciation between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  R. I. Hill,et al.  Vertical distribution, flight behaviour and evolution of wing morphology in Morpho butterflies. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[37]  Theodore Garland,et al.  Phylogenetic Analysis of Covariance by Computer Simulation , 1993 .

[38]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance in ecology , 2001 .

[39]  C. Jiggins,et al.  Pervasive genetic associations between traits causing reproductive isolation in Heliconius butterflies , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  P. Brakefield,et al.  INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL CONSTRAINTS IN THE EVOLUTION OF MORPHOLOGICAL ALLOMETRIES IN A BUTTERFLY , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[41]  Erik Otárola-Castillo,et al.  geomorph: an r package for the collection and analysis of geometric morphometric shape data , 2013 .

[42]  Christian Peter Klingenberg,et al.  Testing and quantifying phylogenetic signals and homoplasy in morphometric data. , 2010, Systematic biology.

[43]  M. Friberg,et al.  Selective Predation on Wing Morphology in Sympatric Damselflies , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[44]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  Permutation tests for multi-factorial analysis of variance , 2003 .

[45]  Paul M. Choate,et al.  Evolution of the Insects , 2006 .

[46]  J. Silvain,et al.  Phylogeny of the genus Morpho Fabricius 1807: insights from two mitochondrial genes (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) , 2012 .

[47]  Byungho Lee,et al.  Aerodynamic Performance of a Gliding Swallowtail Butterfly Wing Model , 2010 .

[48]  R. B. Srygley,et al.  Flight morphology of Neotropical butterflies: palatability and distribution of mass to the thorax and abdomen , 1990, Oecologia.

[49]  A. Monteiro,et al.  Female Bicyclus anynana butterflies choose males on the basis of their dorsal UV-reflective eyespot pupils , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[50]  R. Beutel,et al.  Evolutionary patterns of hind wing morphology in dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae). , 2012, Arthropod structure & development.

[51]  J. D. de Celis Pattern formation in the Drosophila wing: The development of the veins. , 2003, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[52]  T. Bourgoin,et al.  Phylogeny of the genus Morpho Fabricius, 1807, revisited (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) , 2010, Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France.

[53]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Extensions of the Procrustes Method for the Optimal Superimposition of Landmarks , 1990 .

[54]  Liam J. Revell,et al.  phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things) , 2012 .

[55]  T. Price,et al.  Correlates of wing morphology with foraging behaviour and migration distance in the genus Phylloscopus , 1995 .

[56]  P. DeVries,et al.  Phylogenetic Analysis of Morpho Butterflies (Nymphalidae, Morphinae): Implications for Classification and Natural History , 2002 .

[57]  A. Whibley,et al.  Evolution of dominance mechanisms at a butterfly mimicry supergene , 2014, Nature Communications.

[58]  R. Wootton,et al.  WING SHAPE AND FLIGHT BEHAVIOUR IN BUTTERFLIES (LEPIDOPTERA: PAPILIONOIDEA AND HESPERIOIDEA): A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS , 1988 .

[59]  R. Rutowski,et al.  In the Eyes of the Beholders: Female Choice and Avian Predation Risk Associated with an Exaggerated Male Butterfly Color , 2010, The American Naturalist.

[60]  Jeff P. Reeve,et al.  Change in sexual size dimorphism as a correlated response to selection on fecundity , 1999, Heredity.

[61]  C. E. Allen,et al.  Evolution of sexual dimorphism in the Lepidoptera. , 2011, Annual review of entomology.

[62]  J. L. Leeuwen,et al.  How swifts control their glide performance with morphing wings , 2006, Nature.

[63]  R. Dudley,et al.  Wing decoupling in hovering flight of swallowtail butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). , 1994 .

[64]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[65]  Bret J. Pearson,et al.  Recruitment of a hedgehog regulatory circuit in butterfly eyespot evolution. , 1999, Science.

[66]  D. Adams,et al.  A METHOD FOR ASSESSING PHYLOGENETIC LEAST SQUARES MODELS FOR SHAPE AND OTHER HIGH‐DIMENSIONAL MULTIVARIATE DATA , 2014, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[67]  Jesús Marugán-Lobón,et al.  Evolutionary covariation in geometric morphometric data: analyzing integration, modularity, and allometry in a phylogenetic context. , 2013, Systematic biology.

[68]  Alexandros Stamatakis,et al.  RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies , 2014, Bioinform..

[69]  J. Rayner,et al.  Ecological Morphology and Flight in Bats (Mammalia; Chiroptera): Wing Adaptations, Flight Performance, Foraging Strategy and Echolocation , 1987 .

[70]  Bas J Zwaan,et al.  Differences in the selection response of serially repeated color pattern characters: Standing variation, development, and evolution , 2008, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[71]  James Mallet,et al.  Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry , 2001, Nature.

[72]  B. Purser,et al.  Evolution and diversification of Neotropical butterflies: Insights from the biogeography and phylogeny of the genus Morpho Fabricius, 1807 (Nymphalidae: Morphinae), with a review of the geodynamics of South AAmerica. , 2013 .

[73]  Christian Peter Klingenberg,et al.  Morphometric integration and modularity in configurations of landmarks: tools for evaluating a priori hypotheses , 2009, Evolution & development.

[74]  C. Klingenberg,et al.  Competition among growing organs and developmental control of morphological asymmetry , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[75]  Sven Kreiborg,et al.  Surface-bounded growth modeling applied to human mandibles , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[76]  N. Nadeau,et al.  Divergent warning patterns contribute to assortative mating between incipient Heliconius species , 2014, Ecology and evolution.

[77]  MARTI J. ANDERSONa,et al.  PERMUTATION TESTS FOR MULTIFACTORIAL ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE , 2008 .

[78]  R. Lande,et al.  Butterfly dispersal across Amazonia and its implication for biogeography , 2015 .

[79]  C. Klingenberg MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics , 2011, Molecular ecology resources.