Monitoring primary systemic therapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer by using sequential positron emission tomography imaging with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose.

PURPOSE To evaluate positron emission tomography (PET) using [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) for prediction of histopathologic response early during primary systemic therapy of large or locally advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a prospective multicenter trial, 272 FDG-PET scans were performed in 104 patients at baseline (n = 104) and after the first (n = 87) and second cycle (n = 81) of chemotherapy. The level and relative changes in standardized uptake value (SUV) of FDG uptake were assessed regarding their ability to predict histopathologic response. All patients underwent surgery after chemotherapy, and histopathologic response defined as minimal residual disease or gross residual disease served as the reference standard. RESULTS Seventeen (16%) of 104 patients were histopathologic responders and 87 were (84%) nonresponders. All patients for whom baseline SUV was less than 3.0 (n = 24) did not achieve a histopathologic response. SUV decreased by 51% +/- 18% after the first cycle of chemotherapy in histopathologic responders (n = 15), compared with 37% +/- 21% in nonresponders (n = 54; P = .01). A threshold of 45% decrease in SUV correctly identified 11 of 15 responders, and histopathologic nonresponders were identified with a negative predictive value of 90%. Similar results were found after the second cycle when using a threshold of 55% relative decrease in SUV. CONCLUSION FDG-PET allows for prediction of treatment response by the level of FDG uptake in terms of SUV at baseline and after each cycle of chemotherapy. Moreover, relative changes in SUV after the first and second cycle are a strong predictor of response. Thus, FDG-PET may be helpful for individual treatment stratification in breast cancer patients.

[1]  Anna L. Brown,et al.  Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  Wolfgang A Weber,et al.  Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy by sequential F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  Wolfgang A Weber,et al.  PET to assess early metabolic response and to guide treatment of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction: the MUNICON phase II trial. , 2007, The Lancet. Oncology.

[5]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Serial 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to monitor treatment of bone-dominant metastatic breast cancer predicts time to progression (TTP) , 2007, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[6]  J. Bryant,et al.  Pathobiology of preoperative chemotherapy , 2002 .

[7]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Pathological assessment of response to induction chemotherapy in breast cancer. , 1986, Cancer research.

[8]  C. V. D. van de Velde,et al.  Preoperative chemotherapy in primary operable breast cancer: results from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial 10902. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Wolfgang A Weber,et al.  Time course of tumor metabolic activity during chemoradiotherapy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and response to treatment. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in gastric carcinoma by metabolic imaging: results of a prospective trial. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  P F Sharp,et al.  Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose to predict the pathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  Ludovic Ferrer,et al.  Monitoring of early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III breast cancer by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  J. Bryant,et al.  Pathobiology of preoperative chemotherapy: findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel (NSABP) protocol B-18. , 2002, Cancer.

[14]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction by metabolic imaging. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  S. Larson,et al.  Whole body 18FDG-PET and the response of esophageal cancer to induction therapy: results of a prospective trial. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Positron emission tomography in non-small-cell lung cancer: prediction of response to chemotherapy by quantitative assessment of glucose use. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  M Schwaiger,et al.  Positron emission tomography in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: assessment of chemotherapy with fluorodeoxyglucose. , 1998, Blood.

[18]  L. Mortelmans,et al.  Positron emission tomography for assessment of the response to induction radiochemotherapy in locally advanced oesophageal cancer. , 2002, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[19]  S. Giordano,et al.  Update on locally advanced breast cancer. , 2003, The oncologist.

[20]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Update on the management of inflammatory breast cancer. , 2003, The oncologist.

[21]  Paul E Kinahan,et al.  Dynamic and Static Approaches to Quantifying 18F-FDG Uptake for Measuring Cancer Response to Therapy, Including the Effect of Granulocyte CSF , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  J. Blohmer,et al.  Doxorubicin with cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel every 21 days compared with doxorubicin and docetaxel every 14 days as preoperative treatment in operable breast cancer: the GEPARDUO study of the German Breast Group. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  J. Nährig,et al.  Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose for monitoring primary chemotherapy in breast cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  Fiona J. Gilbert,et al.  Monitoring primary breast cancer throughout chemotherapy using FDG-PET , 2007, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[25]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Factors predictive of distant metastases in patients with breast cancer who have a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  Michael Bader,et al.  Early prediction of response to chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer using sequential 18F-FDG PET. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  J. Nährig,et al.  Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose for monitoring primary chemotherapy in breast cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  Mark Muzi,et al.  18F-FDG kinetics in locally advanced breast cancer: correlation with tumor blood flow and changes in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[29]  G. Bonadonna,et al.  Primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: eight-year experience at the Milan Cancer Institute. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  R L Wahl,et al.  Metabolic monitoring of breast cancer chemohormonotherapy using positron emission tomography: initial evaluation. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  G. Giaccone,et al.  Prognostic role of clinical, pathological and biological characteristics in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. , 1998, British Journal of Cancer.

[32]  Norman Wolmark,et al.  Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer:National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  F. Penault-Llorca,et al.  Prognostic significance of a complete pathological response after induction chemotherapy in operable breast cancer , 2002, British Journal of Cancer.

[34]  P. Dupont,et al.  Prognostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) after first-line chemotherapy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: is [18F]FDG-PET a valid alternative to conventional diagnostic methods? , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  I. Zuna,et al.  In vivo chemosensitivity-adapted preoperative chemotherapy in patients with early-stage breast cancer: the GEPARTRIO pilot study. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[36]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Quantitative fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography imaging predicts response to endocrine treatment in breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[37]  Danny Rischin,et al.  Positron emission tomography is superior to computed tomography scanning for response-assessment after radical radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  T. Turkington,et al.  Clinical applications of PET in oncology. , 2004, Radiology.