No Soliciting: Strategies for Managing Unsolicited Innovative Ideas

Unsolicited ideas, the non-contractual and voluntary submission of innovation-related information from external sources to the firm, hold the promise of becoming an almost costless and limitless font for firms’ innovative efforts. In contrast, in this paper, we analyze the difficulties associated with unsolicited ideas processes to understand the problems that firms intending to engage in this form of open and distributed innovation are facing. In particular, we look at the costs that arise from the managerial attention unsolicited ideas require, and the legal setting the process is embedded in. We do so using a series of exploratory interviews, an in-depth case study, and a web-based analysis of the current management practices used by the world’s 150 largest firms. Highlighting quality, quantity, and Intellectual Property issues as the key concerns, we uncover that firms use distinct strategies, which we label signaling, structuring, and selecting, to increase the efficiency and efficacy of the unsolicited ideas process. We discuss the implication of our findings for theories of open and distributed innovation and for management practice.NOTE: Please note that the published version has been substantially extended beyond this draft. Please see Alexy, O., Criscuolo, P., & Ammon, S. 2012. Managing unsolicited ideas for R&D. California Management Review, 54(3): 116-139.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[2]  George A. Akerlof The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism , 1970 .

[3]  Ralph Katz,et al.  Shifting Innovation to Users via Toolkits , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[4]  O. Bjelland,et al.  An Inside View of IBM's 'Innovation Jam' , 2008 .

[5]  Brian S. Silverman,et al.  Alliance-Based Competitive Dynamics , 2002 .

[6]  J. Morse Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed): Mathew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994. Price: $65.00 hardback, $32.00 paperback. 238 pp , 1996 .

[7]  Ammon Salter,et al.  Does IP strategy have to cripple open innovation , 2009 .

[8]  W. Ocasio TOWARDS AN ATTENTION-BASED VIEW OF THE FIRM , 1997 .

[9]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[10]  Martin Schreier,et al.  The Value of Crowdsourcing: Can Users Really Compete with Professionals in Generating New Product Ideas? , 2009 .

[11]  Dominik Walcher,et al.  Toolkits for Idea Competitions: A Novel Method to Integrate Users in New Product Development , 2006 .

[12]  R. Katila,et al.  SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SEARCH BEHAVIOR AND NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTION , 2002 .

[13]  Ove Granstrand,et al.  The economics and management of intellectual property : towards intellectual capitalism , 1999 .

[14]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[15]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Knee-deep in the Big Muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. , 1976 .

[16]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The cathedral and the bazaar - musings on Linux and Open Source by an accidental revolutionary , 2001 .

[17]  James Surowiecki The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations Doubleday Books. , 2004 .

[18]  T. M. Amabile The social psychology of creativity , 1984 .

[19]  Lars Frederiksen,et al.  Why Do Users Contribute to Firm-Hosted User Communities? The Case of Computer-Controlled Music Instruments , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[20]  Roy Rothwell,et al.  SAPPHO updated - project SAPPHO phase II , 1993 .

[21]  P. Mayring Qualitative Content Analysis , 2000 .

[22]  J. Henkel Selective revealing in open innovation processes: the case of embedded Linux (gekürzte Version) , 2006 .

[23]  S. Kates,et al.  When Customers Get Clever: Managerial Approaches to Dealing with Creative Consumers , 2007, Strategic Direction.

[24]  Josh Lerner,et al.  The Simple Economics of Open Source , 2000 .

[25]  Kenneth W. Koput,et al.  A Chaotic Model of Innovative Search: Some Answers, Many Questions , 1997 .

[26]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Profiting from Voluntary Information Spillovers: How Users Benefit by Freely Revealing Their Innovations , 2003 .

[27]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Winning at new products : accelerating the process from idea to launch , 2001 .

[28]  Salvatore Torrisi,et al.  Markets for technology , 2001 .

[29]  K. Arrow Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[30]  B. Skiera,et al.  Sourcing, Filtering, and Evaluating New Product Ideas: An Empirical Exploration of the Performance of Idea Markets , 2012 .

[31]  Chris J. Sablynski,et al.  Qualitative Research in Organizational and Vocational Psychology, 1979–1999 , 1999 .

[32]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[33]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[34]  A. Gustafsson,et al.  Harnessing the Creative Potential among Users , 2004 .

[35]  E. Hippel Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[36]  Peter R. Magnusson,et al.  Exploring the Contributions of Involving Ordinary Users in Ideation of Technology‐Based Services* , 2009 .