Estimation and analysis of multi-GNSS differential code biases using a hardware signal simulator

In ionospheric modeling, the differential code biases (DCBs) are a non-negligible error source, which are routinely estimated by the different analysis centers of the International GNSS Service (IGS) as a by-product of their global ionospheric analysis. These are, however, estimated only for the IGS station receivers and for all the satellites of the different GNSS constellations. A technique is proposed for estimating the receiver and satellites DCBs in a global or regional network by first estimating the DCB of one receiver set as reference. This receiver DCB is then used as a ‘known’ parameter to constrain the global ionospheric solution, where the receiver and satellite DCBs are estimated for the entire network. This is in contrast to the constraint used by the IGS, which assumes that the involved satellites DCBs have a zero mean. The ‘known’ receiver DCB is obtained by simulating signals that are free of the ionospheric, tropospheric and other group delays using a hardware signal simulator. When applying the proposed technique for Global Positioning System legacy signals, mean offsets in the order of 3 ns for satellites and receivers were found to exist between the estimated DCBs and the IGS published DCBs. It was shown that these estimated DCBs are fairly stable in time, especially for the legacy signals. When the proposed technique is applied for the DCBs estimation using the newer Galileo signals, an agreement at the level of 1–2 ns was found between the estimated DCBs and the manufacturer’s measured DCBs, as published by the European Space Agency, for the three still operational Galileo in-orbit validation satellites.

[1]  S. Schaer Mapping and predicting the Earth's ionosphere using the Global Positioning System. , 1999 .

[2]  Murat Durmaz,et al.  Regional vertical total electron content (VTEC) modeling together with satellite and receiver differential code biases (DCBs) using semi-parametric multivariate adaptive regression B-splines (SP-BMARS) , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[3]  G. Sasibhushana Rao,et al.  GPS satellite and receiver instrumental biases estimation using least squares method for accurate ionosphere modelling , 2007 .

[4]  Oliver Montenbruck,et al.  Determination of differential code biases with multi-GNSS observations , 2016, Journal of Geodesy.

[5]  K. Ramalingam,et al.  GPS satellite and receiver instrumental biases estimation using SVD algorithm , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[6]  E. Sardón,et al.  Relationships between GPS-signal propagation errors and EISCAT observations , 1996 .

[7]  A. J. V. Dierendonck Eye on the Ionosphere: Measuring Ionospheric Scintillation Effects from GPS Signals , 1999 .

[8]  Anthony J. Mannucci,et al.  Automated daily processing of more than 1000 ground‐based GPS receivers for studying intense ionospheric storms , 2005 .

[9]  Lei Fan,et al.  Determination of the Differential Code Bias for Current BDS Satellites , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Lao-Sheng Lin REMOTE SENSING OF IONOSPHERE USING GPS MEASUREMENTS , 2001 .

[11]  Takuya Tsugawa,et al.  A new technique for mapping of total electron content using GPS network in Japan , 2002 .

[12]  Ying Li,et al.  Estimation and analysis of Galileo differential code biases , 2017, Journal of Geodesy.

[13]  Yu. V. Yasyukevich,et al.  Variability of GPS/GLONASS differential code biases , 2015 .

[14]  A. J. Van Dierendonck,et al.  Measuring Ionospheric Scintillation Effects from GPS Signals , 2001 .

[15]  Orhan Arikan,et al.  Estimation of single station interfrequency receiver bias using GPS‐TEC , 2008 .

[16]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Differential Code Bias Estimation using Multi‐GNSS Observations and Global Ionosphere Maps , 2014 .

[17]  Gabor E. Lanyi,et al.  A comparison of mapped and measured total ionospheric electron content using global positioning system and beacon satellite observations , 1988 .

[18]  B. Wilson,et al.  Instrumental Biases in Ionospheric Measurements Derived from GPS Data , 1993 .

[19]  Falin Wu,et al.  TEC Measurement By Single Dual-frequency GPS Receiver , 2003 .

[20]  Shuanggen Jin,et al.  M_DCB: Matlab code for estimating GNSS satellite and receiver differential code biases , 2012, GPS Solutions.

[21]  T. Moore,et al.  Ionospheric Scintillation Monitoring in Northern Europe , 2001 .

[22]  Aleksandar Jovancevic,et al.  Ionospheric measurement with GPS: Receiver techniques and methods , 2007 .

[23]  Oliver Montenbruck,et al.  Code Biases in Multi-GNSS Point Positioning , 2013 .

[24]  Yuan Yunbin,et al.  Models and methods for precise determination of Ionospheric delay using GPS , 2007 .

[25]  Michael Meurer,et al.  Ionosphere monitoring and inter-frequency bias determination using Galileo: First results and future prospects , 2011 .

[26]  Oliver Montenbruck,et al.  A study on the dependency of GNSS pseudorange biases on correlator spacing , 2016, GPS Solutions.

[27]  Guanyi Ma,et al.  Derivation of TEC and estimation of instrumental biases from GEONET in Japan , 2002 .

[28]  Jean-Marie Sleewaegen,et al.  Calibration of galileo signals for time metrology , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[29]  James R. Clynch,et al.  Variability of GPS satellite differential group delay biases , 1991 .

[30]  A. Rius,et al.  Estimation of the transmitter and receiver differential biases and the ionospheric total electron content from Global Positioning System observations , 1994 .

[31]  Xinan Yue,et al.  Is the long-term variation of the estimated GPS differential code biases associated with ionospheric variability? , 2016, GPS Solutions.