Effect of Subcutaneous Epinephrine/Saline/Local Anesthetic Versus Saline-Only Injection on Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Site Perfusion, Healing, and Pain

The technique for split-thickness skin graft harvest varies among surgeons. Even though there is scientific evidence that the subcutaneous injection of modified tumescent solution reduces blood loss during burn surgery, the technique has not been unanimously adapted because of, in part, fear of healing retardation. This study prospectively examines the effect of tumescent injection on donor site perfusion, healing, and pain. Ten burn patients in need of grafting with a need for two distinctly different donor sites were included. During the grafting procedure, the two donor areas were randomly assigned to receive either modified tumescent solution or warm sterile saline solution subcutaneously before skin graft harvest with a dermatome. Perfusion, pain, pruritus, and donor site healing were measured, and a follow-up evaluation on scar quality was performed. Baseline perfusion on day 1 was significantly less in the donor site injected with modified tumescent solution (62.26 vs 95.71 perfusion units; P = .031), whereas the response to heat was similar in both sites. The physiologic response to injury (hyperemia) on days 2 and 3 was not suppressed in the modified tumescent group. Pain reported on day 1 was 2.38/10 in the tumescent site and 3.38/10 in the saline site (P = .21). On all other days, measurements showed no difference between the two sites. Donor sites healed in an average of 16.1 days with modified tumescent solution and in 16.4 days with saline. Late follow-up showed no difference in scar quality. The subcutaneous injection of modified tumescent solution before split-thickness donor site harvest has no adverse effect on donor site perfusion past day 1 or donor site healing. The addition of a local anesthetic may decrease pain for 24 hours postoperatively, but the difference in this study group was not significant. This technique should be universally recommended.

[1]  E. Ruokonen,et al.  The effects of topical epinephrine on haemodynamics and markers of tissue perfusion in burned and non-burned patients requiring skin grafting. , 2009, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[2]  S. Gaufberg,et al.  Expanding the use of topical anesthesia in wound management: sequential layered application of topical lidocaine with epinephrine. , 2007, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[3]  J. Serletti,et al.  Transfusion-Free Pediatric Burn Surgery: Techniques and Strategies , 2005, Annals of plastic surgery.

[4]  L. Salemark,et al.  A prospective double blind randomized study comparing the need for blood transfusion with terlipressin or a placebo during early excision and grafting of burns. , 2004, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[5]  A. Cooper,et al.  What are the acute cardiovascular effects of subcutaneous and topical epinephrine for hemostasis during burn surgery? , 2003, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[6]  J. Cone,et al.  The tumescent technique to significantly reduce blood loss during burn surgery. , 2001, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[7]  C. Snelling,et al.  Tourniquet and subcutaneous epinephrine reduce blood loss during burn excision and immediate autografting. , 2001, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[8]  J. Fish,et al.  Reduced blood loss during burn surgery. , 2001, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[9]  J. Fish,et al.  Minimizing blood loss in burn surgery. , 2000, The Journal of trauma.

[10]  K. Dunn,et al.  Subcutaneous adrenaline infiltration in paediatric burn surgery. , 1999, British journal of plastic surgery.

[11]  P. Dziewulski,et al.  Effect of topical and subcutaneous epinephrine in combination with topical thrombin in blood loss during immediate near-total burn wound excision in pediatric burned patients. , 1999, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[12]  R. Bush,et al.  The effect of clysed and topical epinephrine on intraoperative catecholamine levels. , 1998, The Journal of trauma.

[13]  S. Jones,et al.  The safety of topical anaesthetic and analgesic agents in a gel when used to provide pain relief at split skin donor sites. , 1998, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[14]  A. Dimick,et al.  Methods to diminish intraoperative blood loss. , 1991, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[15]  C. Goodwin,et al.  Tourniquet technique for reduced blood loss and wound assessment during excisions of burn wounds of the extremity. , 1990, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.