A comparison of sonographic examinations for trauma performed by surgeons and radiologists.

BACKGROUND It has been demonstrated that surgeons and surgery residents, trained in the focused abdominal sonographic examination, are able to accurately and reliably evaluate trauma patients. Despite this, radiologists have objected to surgeon-performed sonography for several reasons. We set out to compare the accuracy of sonographic examinations performed by surgery residents and radiologists. METHODS A retrospective review of medical records of all trauma patients who received focused ultrasound examinations from January 1, 1995, through June 30, 1996, at one of two American College of Surgeons-verified Level I trauma centers in the same city was undertaken. Ultrasound examinations were performed by surgery residents at trauma center A (TCA) and by radiologists or radiology residents at trauma center B (TCB). Findings for each patient were compared with the results of computed tomography, diagnostic peritoneal lavage, operative exploration, or observation. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for each group of patients. Comparison of patient charges for the trauma ultrasound examinations at each of the trauma centers was also made. RESULTS Patient populations at the two centers were similar except that the mean Injury Severity Score at TCB was higher than at TCA (11.74 vs. 9.6). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, or negative predictive value were not significantly different between the two cohorts. A significantly lower positive predictive value for examinations performed by surgery residents was noted and attributed to a lower threshold of the surgery residents to confirm their findings by computed tomography. Billing data revealed that the average charge for trauma sonography by radiologists (TCB) was $406.30. At TCA, trauma sonography did not generate a specific charge; however, a $20.00 sum was added to the trauma activation fee to cover ultrasound machine maintenance and supplies. CONCLUSION Focused ultrasound examination in the trauma suite can be as safely and accurately performed by surgery residents as by radiologists and radiology residents and should be a routine part of the initial trauma evaluation process.

[1]  F. C. Chang,et al.  Sonographic examination of abdominal trauma by senior surgical residents. , 1997, The American surgeon.

[2]  B. Boulanger,et al.  Emergent abdominal sonography as a screening test in a new diagnostic algorithm for blunt trauma. , 1996, The Journal of trauma.

[3]  G. Casola,et al.  A prospective evaluation of abdominal ultrasound in blunt trauma: is it useful? , 1996, The Journal of trauma.

[4]  D. Nunez,et al.  Evaluating blunt abdominal trauma:role for ultrasonography. , 1996, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[5]  G. Rozycki,et al.  Ultrasound, what every trauma surgeon should know. , 1996, The Journal of trauma.

[6]  T. P. Davis,et al.  A prospective study of surgeon-performed ultrasound as the primary adjuvant modality for injured patient assessment. , 1995, The Journal of trauma.

[7]  J R Mateer,et al.  Prospective analysis of a rapid trauma ultrasound examination performed by emergency physicians. , 1995, The Journal of trauma.

[8]  D. Nunez,et al.  Can ultrasound replace diagnostic peritoneal lavage in the assessment of blunt trauma? , 1994, Journal of Trauma.

[9]  G. Wetscher,et al.  Ultrasonography in the management of blunt abdominal and thoracic trauma. , 1994, Archives of surgery.

[10]  O. Goletti,et al.  The role of ultrasonography in blunt abdominal trauma: results in 250 consecutive cases. , 1994, The Journal of trauma.

[11]  S. Shackford Focused ultrasound examinations by surgeons: the time is now. , 1993, The Journal of trauma.

[12]  M Liu,et al.  Prospective comparison of diagnostic peritoneal lavage, computed tomographic scanning, and ultrasonography for the diagnosis of blunt abdominal trauma. , 1993, The Journal of trauma.

[13]  G. Rozycki,et al.  Prospective evaluation of surgeons' use of ultrasound in the evaluation of trauma patients. , 1993, The Journal of trauma.

[14]  D. Candinas,et al.  Ultrasound in blunt abdominal and thoracic trauma. , 1993, The Journal of trauma.

[15]  M. Rothmund,et al.  Ultrasonography in blunt abdominal trauma: influence of the investigators' experience. , 1993, The Journal of trauma.

[16]  A. V. van Vugt,et al.  Abdominal ultrasound as a reliable indicator for conclusive laparotomy in blunt abdominal trauma. , 1993, The Journal of trauma.

[17]  G. Regel,et al.  Blunt abdominal trauma in cases of multiple trauma evaluated by ultrasonography: a prospective analysis of 291 patients. , 1992, The Journal of trauma.

[18]  B. Boulanger,et al.  Sonography in blunt abdominal trauma: a preliminary progress report. , 1991, The Journal of trauma.

[19]  T. Otsuka,et al.  Emergency center ultrasonography in the evaluation of hemoperitoneum: a prospective study. , 1991, The Journal of trauma.

[20]  M. Rothmund,et al.  Sonography versus peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma. , 1989, The Journal of trauma.

[21]  R. Filly Ultrasound: the stethoscope of the future, alas. , 1988, Radiology.

[22]  W. Pilbrow,et al.  Ultrasound in abdominal trauma: an alternative to peritoneal lavage. , 1988, Archives of emergency medicine.