Serum protein fingerprinting coupled with a pattern-matching algorithm distinguishes prostate cancer from benign prostate hyperplasia and healthy men.

The prostate-specific antigen test has been a major factor in increasing awareness and better patient management of prostate cancer (PCA), but its lack of specificity limits its use in diagnosis and makes for poor early detection of PCA. The objective of our studies is to identify better biomarkers for early detection of PCA using protein profiling technologies that can simultaneously resolve and analyze multiple proteins. Evaluating multiple proteins will be essential to establishing signature proteomic patterns that distinguish cancer from noncancer as well as identify all genetic subtypes of the cancer and their biological activity. In this study, we used a protein biochip surface enhanced laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry approach coupled with an artificial intelligence learning algorithm to differentiate PCA from noncancer cohorts. Surface enhanced laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry protein profiles of serum from 167 PCA patients, 77 patients with benign prostate hyperplasia, and 82 age-matched unaffected healthy men were used to train and develop a decision tree classification algorithm that used a nine-protein mass pattern that correctly classified 96% of the samples. A blinded test set, separated from the training set by a stratified random sampling before the analysis, was used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the classification system. A sensitivity of 83%, a specificity of 97%, and a positive predictive value of 96% for the study population and 91% for the general population were obtained when comparing the PCA versus noncancer (benign prostate hyperplasia/healthy men) groups. This high-throughput proteomic classification system will provide a highly accurate and innovative approach for the early detection/diagnosis of PCA.

[1]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[2]  P. Scardino,et al.  Early detection of prostate cancer. , 1989, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[3]  M. Barry,et al.  Early detection of prostate cancer. Part I: Prior probability and effectiveness of tests. The American College of Physicians. , 1997, Annals of internal medicine.

[4]  Christopher Coley,et al.  CLINICAL GUIDELINE: PART 1: Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Part I , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  A W Partin,et al.  The role of PSA and percent free PSA for staging and prognosis prediction in clinically localized prostate cancer. , 1998, Seminars in urologic oncology.

[6]  T. Yip,et al.  Bactericidal domain of lactoferrin: detection, quantitation, and characterization of lactoferricin in serum by SELDI affinity mass spectrometry. , 1998, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[7]  C C Schulman,et al.  PSA, PSA density, PSA density of transition zone, free/total PSA ratio, and PSA velocity for early detection of prostate cancer in men with serum PSA 2.5 to 4.0 ng/mL. , 1999, Urology.

[8]  G. Wright,et al.  Proteinchip® surface enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SELDI) mass spectrometry: a novel protein biochip technology for detection of prostate cancer biomarkers in complex protein mixtures , 1999, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[9]  S. Weinberger,et al.  Recent advancements in surface‐enhanced laser desorption/ionization‐time of flight‐mass spectrometry , 2000, Electrophoresis.

[10]  Margaret S. Pepe,et al.  Receiver Operating Characteristic Methodology , 2000 .

[11]  T. Keough,et al.  Tandem mass spectrometry methods for definitive protein identification in proteomics research , 2000, Electrophoresis.

[12]  M. Lise,et al.  Protein profiles in sera of patients with malignant cutaneous melanoma. , 2000, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[13]  G. Wright,et al.  Development of a novel proteomic approach for the detection of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder in urine. , 2001, The American journal of pathology.

[14]  T. Stamey Preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) below 10 microg/l predicts neither the presence of prostate cancer nor the rate of postoperative PSA failure. , 2001, Clinical chemistry.

[15]  S. Ethier,et al.  Differential screening and mass mapping of proteins from premalignant and cancer cell lines using nonporous reversed-phase HPLC coupled with mass spectrometric analysis. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[16]  S Hanash,et al.  Proteomics in early detection of cancer. , 2001, Clinical chemistry.

[17]  A. Vlahou,et al.  Proteomic approaches to biomarker discovery in prostate and bladder cancers , 2001, Proteomics.

[18]  H M Rosenberg,et al.  Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer (1973 through 1998), featuring cancers with recent increasing trends. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  P. Schellhammer,et al.  Quantitation of serum prostate-specific membrane antigen by a novel protein biochip immunoassay discriminates benign from malignant prostate disease. , 2001, Cancer research.

[20]  E. Petricoin,et al.  Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer , 2002, The Lancet.

[21]  A. Lu,et al.  Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen levels between 2 and 22 ng./ml. correlate poorly with post-radical prostatectomy cancer morphology: prostate specific antigen cure rates appear constant between 2 and 9 ng./ml. , 2002, The Journal of urology.