I'm a believer: Illusory self-generated touch elicits sensory attenuation and somatosensory evoked potentials similar to the real self-touch

Sensory attenuation (i.e., the phenomenon whereby self-produced sensations are perceived as less intense compared to externally occurring ones) is among the neurocognitive processes that help distinguishing ourselves from others. It is thought to be rooted in the motor system (e.g., related to motor intention and prediction), while the role of body awareness, which necessarily accompanies any voluntary movement, in this phenomenon is largely unknown. To fill this gap, here we compared the perceived intensity, somatosensory evoked potentials, and alpha-band desynchronization for self-generated, other-generated, and embodied-fake-hand-generated somatosensory stimuli. We showed that sensory attenuation triggered by the own hand and by the embodied fake hand had the same behavioral and neurophysiological signatures (reduced subjective intensity, reduced of N140 and P2 SEP components and post-stimulus alpha-band desynchronization). Therefore, signals subserving body ownership influenced attenuation of somatosensory stimuli, possibly in a postdictive manner. This indicates that body ownership is crucial for distinguishing the source of the perceived sensations.

[1]  R. Cooper,et al.  Inhibition of cortical evoked potentials and sensation by self-initiated movement in man , 1975, Nature.

[2]  K. Lange.  The reduced N1 to self-generated tones: an effect of temporal predictability? , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[3]  T. Wilson,et al.  Children with Cerebral Palsy Hyper-Gate Somatosensory Stimulations of the Foot , 2017, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  P. Haggard.  Human volition: towards a neuroscience of will , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[5]  H. Ehrsson,et al.  Moving a Rubber Hand that Feels Like Your Own: A Dissociation of Ownership and Agency , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[6]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Alex I. Wiesman,et al.  Haptic exploration attenuates and alters somatosensory cortical oscillations , 2018, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Sensory Processing and the Rubber Hand Illusion—An Evoked Potentials Study , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  C. Miniussi,et al.  The Functional Importance of Rhythmic Activity in the Brain , 2012, Current Biology.

[10]  Marie C. Krüger,et al.  20 Hz Steady-State Response in Somatosensory Cortex During Induction of Tactile Perceptual Learning Through LTP-Like Sensory Stimulation , 2020, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

[11]  Simon Hanslmayr,et al.  Alpha phase reset contributes to the generation of ERPs. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  J. Gross,et al.  On the Role of Prestimulus Alpha Rhythms over Occipito-Parietal Areas in Visual Input Regulation: Correlation or Causation? , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Perception of the Consequences of Self-Action Is Temporally Tuned and Event Driven , 2005, Current Biology.

[14]  Action Biases Perceptual Decisions Toward Expected Outcomes , 2020, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  H. Ehrsson,et al.  The moving rubber hand illusion revisited: Comparing movements and visuotactile stimulation to induce illusory ownership , 2014, Consciousness and Cognition.

[16]  R. C. Oldfield.  THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[17]  A Mouraux,et al.  Across-trial averaging of event-related EEG responses and beyond. , 2008, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[18]  E. Schafer,et al.  Self-stimulation alters human sensory brain responses. , 1974, Science.

[19]  R. Ricci,et al.  Beauty in mind: Aesthetic appreciation correlates with perceptual facilitation and attentional amplification , 2019, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  F. D. de Lange,et al.  Action sharpens sensory representations of expected outcomes , 2018, Nature Communications.

[21]  P. Kok,et al.  The Perceptual Prediction Paradox , 2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[23]  Florian Waszak,et al.  ERP correlates of action effect prediction and visual sensory attenuation in voluntary action , 2011, NeuroImage.

[24]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Cortical beta oscillations reflect the contextual gating of visual action feedback , 2020, NeuroImage.

[25]  R. Ricci,et al.  Aesthetic appreciation of musical intervals enhances behavioural and neurophysiological indexes of attentional engagement and motor inhibition , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[26]  Torsten Ingemann Nielsen,et al.  VOLITION: A NEW EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH , 1963 .

[27]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  W. Kunde,et al.  Do We See It or Not? Sensory Attenuation in the Visual Domain , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Event-related cortical desynchronization detected by power measurements of scalp EEG. , 1977, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[30]  M. Pyasik,et al.  Do movements contribute to sense of body ownership? Rubber hand illusion in expert pianists , 2018, Psychological Research.

[31]  Gregor Thut,et al.  The role of brain oscillations in predicting self-generated sounds , 2017, NeuroImage.

[32]  M. Slater,et al.  The building blocks of the full body ownership illusion , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[33]  S. Gallagher.  Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  Barbara F. Händel,et al.  Top-Down Controlled Alpha Band Activity in Somatosensory Areas Determines Behavioral Performance in a Discrimination Task , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Waves of prediction , 2019, PLoS biology.

[36]  Anthony M. Harris,et al.  Detecting Unattended Stimuli Depends on the Phase of Prestimulus Neural Oscillations , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  Laurence Mouchnino,et al.  On the neural basis of sensory weighting: Alpha, beta and gamma modulations during complex movements , 2017, NeuroImage.

[38]  E. Schröger,et al.  Suppression of the auditory N1 event-related potential component with unpredictable self-initiated tones: evidence for internal forward models with dynamic stimulation. , 2008, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[39]  Mel Slater,et al.  Body ownership causes illusory self-attribution of speaking and influences subsequent real speaking , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  M. Slater,et al.  Measuring the Effects through Time of the Influence of Visuomotor and Visuotactile Synchronous Stimulation on a Virtual Body Ownership Illusion , 2014, Perception.

[41]  Pei-Ying S. Chan,et al.  Age-Related Reduced Somatosensory Gating Is Associated with Altered Alpha Frequency Desynchronization , 2015, Neural plasticity.

[42]  Gian Domenico Iannetti,et al.  Saliency Detection as a Reactive Process: Unexpected Sensory Events Evoke Corticomuscular Coupling , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Attenuation of Self-Generated Tactile Sensations Is Predictive, not Postdictive , 2006, PLoS biology.

[44]  Carlotta Fossataro,et al.  Suppressing movements with phantom limbs and existing limbs evokes comparable electrophysiological inhibitory responses , 2019, Cortex.

[45]  F. Pavani,et al.  Left tactile extinction following visual stimulation of a rubber hand. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[46]  O. Jensen,et al.  Shaping Functional Architecture by Oscillatory Alpha Activity: Gating by Inhibition , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[47]  Y. Ohki,et al.  Spontaneous imitative movements induced by an illusory embodied fake hand , 2018, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  Felix Blankenburg,et al.  Network activity underlying the illusory self‐attribution of a dummy arm , 2015, Human brain mapping.

[49]  H. Ehrsson,et al.  Body ownership determines the attenuation of self-generated tactile sensations , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  D. Cheyne,et al.  Localization of human somatosensory cortex using spatially filtered magnetoencephalography , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[51]  Atsushi Sato,et al.  Both motor prediction and conceptual congruency between preview and action-effect contribute to explicit judgment of agency , 2009, Cognition.

[52]  D. Burin,et al.  That’s my hand! Therefore, that’s my willed action: How body ownership acts upon conscious awareness of willed actions , 2017, Cognition.

[53]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Motor prediction , 2001, Current Biology.

[54]  Erich Schröger,et al.  The N1-suppression effect for self-initiated sounds is independent of attention , 2012, BMC Neuroscience.

[55]  H. Ehrsson,et al.  Efference Copy Is Necessary for the Attenuation of Self-Generated Touch. , 2020, iScience.

[56]  Alex I. Wiesman,et al.  Oscillatory dynamics and functional connectivity during gating of primary somatosensory responses , 2017, The Journal of physiology.

[57]  János Horváth,et al.  Attenuation of auditory ERPs to action-sound coincidences is not explained by voluntary allocation of attention. , 2013, Psychophysiology.

[58]  Eishi Asano,et al.  Somatosensory-related gamma-, beta- and alpha-augmentation precedes alpha- and beta-attenuation in humans , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[59]  T. Wilson,et al.  Practice modulates motor‐related beta oscillations differently in adolescents and adults , 2019, The Journal of physiology.

[60]  Mel Slater,et al.  First Person Perspective of Seated Participants Over a Walking Virtual Body Leads to Illusory Agency Over the Walking , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[61]  Pedro Lopes,et al.  Action-Dependent Processing of Touch in the Human Parietal Operculum and Posterior Insula. , 2019, Cerebral cortex.

[62]  P. Haggard,et al.  The rubber hand illusion: Sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[63]  M. Pyasik,et al.  On the relation between body ownership and sense of agency: A link at the level of sensory-related signals. , 2018, Acta psychologica.

[64]  Lorenzo Pia,et al.  Comparing intensities and modalities within the sensory attenuation paradigm: Preliminary evidence , 2017, Journal of advanced research.

[65]  M. Pyasik,et al.  The Role of Body-Related Afferent Signals in Human Sense of Agency , 2019, Journal of experimental neuroscience.

[66]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Spatio-Temporal Prediction Modulates the Perception of Self-Produced Stimuli , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[67]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[68]  S. M. Aglioti,et al.  Mere observation of body discontinuity affects perceived ownership and vicarious agency over a virtual hand , 2015, Experimental Brain Research.

[69]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Computational principles of sensorimotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[70]  Irene Ronga,et al.  “As long as that is my hand, that willed action is mine”: Timing of agency triggered by body ownership , 2018, Consciousness and Cognition.

[71]  Marco Davare,et al.  Physiological and Perceptual Sensory Attenuation Have Different Underlying Neurophysiological Correlates , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[72]  A. Mouraux,et al.  Novelty is not enough: laser-evoked potentials are determined by stimulus saliency, not absolute novelty. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[73]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Motor Intention Determines Sensory Attenuation of Brain Responses to Self-initiated Sounds , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[74]  M. Tsakiris,et al.  Hands only illusion: multisensory integration elicits sense of ownership for body parts but not for non-corporeal objects , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[75]  A. Berti,et al.  Movements and body ownership: Evidence from the rubber hand illusion after mechanical limb immobilization , 2017, Neuropsychologia.

[76]  R. Romo,et al.  α-Oscillations in the monkey sensorimotor network influence discrimination performance by rhythmical inhibition of neuronal spiking , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[77]  J. Kilner,et al.  Abnormal movement‐related suppression of sensory evoked potentials in upper limb dystonia , 2016, European journal of neurology.

[78]  Andrea Desantis,et al.  Mechanisms of intentional binding and sensory attenuation: the role of temporal prediction, temporal control, identity prediction, and motor prediction. , 2013, Psychological bulletin.

[79]  E. Schafer,et al.  Self-Stimulation Alters Human Sensory Brain Responses , 1973, Science.

[80]  G. Chatrian,et al.  The blocking of the rolandic wicket rhythm and some central changes related to movement. , 1959, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[81]  T. Wilson,et al.  The Strength of the Movement-related Somatosensory Cortical Oscillations Differ between Adolescents and Adults , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[82]  S. Blakemore,et al.  Dynamic Modulation of Human Motor Activity When Observing Actions , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[83]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control , 1996, Neural Networks.

[84]  A. Berti,et al.  Shared neurocognitive mechanisms of attenuating self-touch and illusory self-touch , 2019, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[85]  J. Gross,et al.  Beta‐band oscillations play an essential role in motor–auditory interactions , 2019, Human brain mapping.

[86]  Arno Villringer,et al.  Imperceptible Somatosensory Stimulation Alters Sensorimotor Background Rhythm and Connectivity , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[87]  Konstantina Kilteni,et al.  Efference Copy Is Necessary for the Attenuation of Self-Generated Touch , 2019, bioRxiv.

[88]  Jakub Limanowski,et al.  Different responses of the right superior temporal sulcus to visual movement feedback during self‐generated vs. externally generated hand movements , 2018, The European journal of neuroscience.