Dopaminergic modulation of glutamate-induced excitations of neurons in the neostriatum and nucleus accumbens of awake, unrestrained rats.

1. Single-unit recording and iontophoresis were used in awake, unrestrained rats to assess the action of dopamine (DA) and glutamate (GLU) on the spontaneous activity of neurons in the neostriatum and nucleus accumbens. 2. A total of 88 neurons (40 neostriatal and 48 accumbal) was recorded from 7 rats during 13 recording sessions. During quiet rest, spontaneously active neurons discharged at a slow rate and irregular pattern of activity. Accumbal neurons had a significantly faster level of basal activity than neostriatal neurons (modal values of 10.3 vs. 2.1 imp/s, respectively). 3. Neuronal responses to separate applications of DA and GLU (5-80 nA; 15-30 s) were tested on 40 and 76 units (195 and 227 applications), respectively, during the quiet resting period. The effect of prolonged DA iontophoresis (5-80 nA; 2-3 min) on GLU-induced changes in impulse activity was tested on 38 units (72 applications). 4. GLU activated all cells in both structures. This response appeared with a latency of 0.5-4.0 s at different ejection currents (5-40 nA; mean threshold of 22.2 nA) and was highly variable (103-11,520% of basal activity). Response magnitude correlated strongly with the rate of basal activity (r = 0.822). 5. DA inhibited 75% of spontaneously active neostriatal and accumbal cells with a mean threshold of 20.4 nA. In contrast to the GLU excitation, the DA-induced inhibition was relatively weak in magnitude (10-90% of basal activity) and occurred with relatively longer on- and offset latencies than GLU (2-20 s). The inhibitory effect of DA was absent during phasic activations of neuronal activity associated with movement. Two neostriatal neurons responded to DA with a dose-dependent excitation. 6. Prolonged DA iontophoresis altered both basal impulse activity (causing a decrease in 36 of 72 applications and an increase in 4) and the magnitude of the GLU-induced activation (decreasing it in 27 of 72 applications and increasing it in 12). The net result was an overall enhancement of the GLU response relative to the DA-induced change in basal activity (74% of cases). This increase in the GLU response occurred at relatively low DA ejection currents (10-30 nA). It was stronger in the nucleus accumbens than in the neostriatum and was most evident on cells having both a moderate level of basal activity and a relatively small initial response to GLU. When DA was ejected at high currents (> 40 nA) and/or the magnitude of the preceding GLU-induced activation was high (> 800% of basal activity), DA tended to decrease the GLU response. 7. DA appears to exert a slight depression of striatal and accumbal activity, which has the effect of amplifying the phasic activation induced by GLU. Because forebrain DA release occurs in response to behaviorally important stimuli, the DA-induced modulation of the GLU response may play an important role in regulating goal-directed behavior.

[1]  F E Bloom,et al.  Central catecholamine neuron systems: anatomy and physiology of the dopamine systems. , 1978, Annual review of neuroscience.

[2]  Laurent Descarries,et al.  Modulatory role for biogenic amines in the cerebral cortex. Microiontophoretic studies , 1979, Brain Research.

[3]  D J Woodward,et al.  Modulatory actions of norepinephrine in the central nervous system. , 1979, Federation proceedings.

[4]  J. D. Miller,et al.  Mesencephalic dopaminergic unit activity in the behaviorally conditioned rat. , 1981, Life sciences.

[5]  I. Walaas Biochemical evidence for overlapping neocortical and allocortical glutamate projections to the nucleus accumbens and rostral caudatoputamen in the rat brain , 1981, Neuroscience.

[6]  R. Wise Neuroleptics and operant behavior: The anhedonia hypothesis , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  J. Walters,et al.  Dopamine modulation of the effects of gamma-aminobutyric acid on substantia nigra pars reticulata neurons. , 1983, Science.

[8]  E. T. Rolls,et al.  Responses of striatal neurons in the behaving monkey. 3. Effects of iontophoretically applied dopamine on normal responsiveness , 1984, Neuroscience.

[9]  B. Jacobs,et al.  Dopaminergic modulation of sensory responses of striatal neurons: single unit studies , 1985, Brain Research.

[10]  G. Levi,et al.  Dopamine decreases cell excitability in rat striatal neurons by pre- and postsynaptic mechanisms , 1985, Brain Research.

[11]  F. Gonon,et al.  Regulation of dopamine release by impulse flow and by autoreceptors as studied by in vivo voltammetry in the rat striatum , 1985, Neuroscience.

[12]  Theodore W. Berger,et al.  Interactions between dopamine and amino acid-induced excitation and inhibition in the striatum , 1986, Brain Research.

[13]  W. Schultz Responses of midbrain dopamine neurons to behavioral trigger stimuli in the monkey. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  T. Ono,et al.  Neuronal activity in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) during motivated bar press feeding in the monkey , 1987, Brain Research.

[15]  R. Wise,et al.  The role of reward pathways in the development of drug dependence. , 1987, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[16]  X.-T. Hu,et al.  Comparison of effects of D-1 and D-2 dopamine receptor agonists on neurons in the rat caudate putamen: an electrophysiological study , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  W. B. Orr,et al.  Evidence for two functionally distinct subpopulations of neurons within the rat striatum , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  E. A. Kiaytkin Functional properties of presumed dopamine-containing and other ventral tegmental area neurons in conscious rats. , 1988, The International journal of neuroscience.

[19]  G. Rebec,et al.  Heterogenous responses of neostriatal neurons to amphetamine in freely moving rats , 1988, Brain Research.

[20]  F. Bloom,et al.  Cellular and molecular mechanisms of drug dependence. , 1988, Science.

[21]  A. Mcgeorge,et al.  The organization of the projection from the cerebral cortex to the striatum in the rat , 1989, Neuroscience.

[22]  A. Parent Extrinsic connections of the basal ganglia , 1990, Trends in Neurosciences.

[23]  W. Schultz,et al.  Dopamine neurons of the monkey midbrain: contingencies of responses to stimuli eliciting immediate behavioral reactions. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  M. Le Moal,et al.  Mesocorticolimbic dopaminergic network: functional and regulatory roles. , 1991, Physiological reviews.

[25]  A. Grace Phasic versus tonic dopamine release and the modulation of dopamine system responsivity: A hypothesis for the etiology of schizophrenia , 1991, Neuroscience.

[26]  A. Grace,et al.  Midbrain dopamine system electrophysiological functioning: A review and new hypothesis , 1991, Synapse.

[27]  W. Schultz,et al.  Neuronal activity in monkey striatum related to the expectation of predictable environmental events. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  George V. Rebec,et al.  Striatal single-unit responses to amphetamine and neuroleptics in freely moving rats , 1993, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[29]  Robert E. Hampson,et al.  Firing patterns of nucleus accumbens neurons during cocaine self-administration in rats , 1993, Brain Research.

[30]  R. Christopher Pierce,et al.  A simple micromanipulator for multiple uses in freely moving rats: electrophysiology, voltammetry, and simultaneous intracerebral infusions , 1993, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[31]  George V. Rebec,et al.  Neuronal and behavioral correlates of intrastriatal infusions of amphetamine in freely moving rats , 1993, Brain Research.

[32]  G. Rebec,et al.  Responses of rat striatal neurons during performance of a lever-release version of the conditioned avoidance response task , 1993, Brain Research.

[33]  G. Rebec,et al.  Cortical lesions attenuate the opposing effects of amphetamine and haloperidol on neostriatal neurons in freely moving rats. , 1994, European journal of pharmacology.

[34]  G. Rebec,et al.  Cortical and Dopaminergic Regulation of Amphetamine-Induced Changes In Striatal Single-Unit Activity in Awake, Behaving Rats , 1994 .

[35]  P. Garris,et al.  Different kinetics govern dopaminergic transmission in the amygdala, prefrontal cortex, and striatum: an in vivo voltammetric study , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[36]  D. Woodward,et al.  Electrophysiological and pharmacological evidence for the role of the nucleus accumbens in cocaine self-administration in freely moving rats , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[37]  G. Rebec,et al.  Iontophoresis in the neostriatum of awake, unrestrained rats: Differential effects of dopamine, glutamate and ascorbate on motor- and nonmotor-related neurons , 1995, Neuroscience.