Contact points during multidigit grasping of geometric objects

We investigated the choice of contact points during multidigit grasping of different objects. In Experiment 1, cylinders were grasped and lifted. Participants were either instructed as to the number of fingers they should use, ranging from a two-finger grasp to a five-finger grasp, or could grasp with their preferred number of fingers. We found a strong relationship between the position of the fingertips on the object and the number of fingers used. In general, variability in the choice of contact points was low within- as well as between participants. The virtual finger, defined as the geometric mean position of fingers opposing the thumb, was in almost perfect opposition to the thumb, suggesting the formation of a functional unit using all contributing fingers in the grasp. In Experiment 2, four more complex shapes (rectangle, hexagon, pentagon, curved object) were grasped. Although we found some moderate between-participant variability in the choice of contact points, the within-participant variability was again remarkably low. In both experiments, participants showed a strong preference to use four or five fingers during grasping when left with free choice. Taken together, our findings suggest a preplanning of the grasping movement and that grasping results from a coordinated interplay between the fingers contributing to the grasp that cannot be understood as independent digit movements.

[1]  J. Napier The prehensile movements of the human hand. , 1956, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  S. John Some optimal multivariate tests , 1971 .

[3]  M. Jeannerod Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects , 1981 .

[4]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and performance IX , 1982 .

[5]  M. Jeannerod The timing of natural prehension movements. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[6]  A. Goodwin,et al.  Hand function and the neocortex , 1985 .

[7]  M. Arbib Coordinated control programs for movements of the hand , 1985 .

[8]  A. Hayter The Maximum Familywise Error Rate of Fisher's Least Significant Difference Test , 1986 .

[9]  M. Arbib,et al.  Opposition Space as a Structuring Concept for the Analysis of Skilled Hand Movements , 1986 .

[10]  H. Heuer,et al.  Generation and modulation of action patterns , 1986 .

[11]  Paul Milgram,et al.  A spectacle-mounted liquid-crystal tachistoscope , 1987 .

[12]  K. Newell,et al.  Body scale and the development of prehension. , 1989, Developmental psychobiology.

[13]  R. Kirk,et al.  Power Comparisons of Eight Tests for Sphericity in Repeated Measures Designs , 1992 .

[14]  G. Bingham,et al.  Center of mass perception and inertial frames of reference , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Body scale and infant grip configurations. , 1993, Developmental psychobiology.

[16]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension , 1994, Current Biology.

[17]  G. Caldwell,et al.  From cognition to biomechanics and back: the end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster effect. , 1996, Acta psychologica.

[18]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Influence of object position and size on human prehension movements , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  A. Wing,et al.  Anticipating load torques produced by voluntary movements. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  R S Johansson,et al.  Control of fingertip forces in multidigit manipulation. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Approaching grasping from different perspectives. , 1999, Motor control.

[22]  E. Brenner,et al.  A new view on grasping. , 1999, Motor control.

[23]  K. Newell,et al.  On taking the grasping out of prehension. , 1999, Motor control.

[24]  R. Marteniuk,et al.  On achieving strong inference in prehension research. , 1999, Motor control.

[25]  B. Steenbergen What can be learned from Smeets and Brenner's model about the control of grasping? , 1999, Motor control.

[26]  K. Newell,et al.  The scaling of human grip configurations. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Force synergies for multifingered grasping , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  K. Newell,et al.  Body-scaled transitions in human grip configurations. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Two virtual fingers in the control of the tripod grasp. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  E. Brenner,et al.  Independent movements of the digits in grasping , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Posture-based motion planning: applications to grasping. , 2001, Psychological review.

[32]  M. Gentilucci,et al.  Finger control in the tripod grasp , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  A. Wing,et al.  Perceptual judgement, grasp point selection and object symmetry , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements , 1991, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  E. Brenner,et al.  Grasping reveals visual misjudgements of shape , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  Marco Santello,et al.  Choice of Contact Points during Multidigit Grasping: Effect of Predictability of Object Center of Mass Location , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  B. Steenbergen,et al.  The effect of the “rod-and-frame” illusion on grip planning in a sequential object manipulation task , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  Luca Turella,et al.  An object for an action, the same object for other actions: effects on hand shaping , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  T. Flash,et al.  Task-Dependent Selection of Grasp Kinematics and Stiffness in Human Object Manipulation , 2007, Cortex.

[40]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Planning for manual positioning: the end-state comfort effect for manual abduction–adduction , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  C. V. D. Kamp,et al.  Prehension is really reaching and grasping , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  Jaebum Park,et al.  Prehension synergies: principle of superposition and hierarchical organization in circular object prehension , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  E. Brenner,et al.  Grasping trapezoidal objects , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  G. Schwarzer,et al.  Development of Visual Center of Mass Localization for Grasp Point Selection. , 2008 .

[45]  M. Santello,et al.  Anticipatory Control of Grasping: Independence of Sensorimotor Memories for Kinematics and Kinetics , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  Hartwig R. Siebner,et al.  Brain activity is similar during precision and power gripping with light force: An fMRI study , 2008, NeuroImage.

[47]  M. Santello,et al.  Anticipatory Planning and Control of Grasp Positions and Forces for Dexterous Two-Digit Manipulation , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[48]  A. N. van den Pol,et al.  Kisspeptin Directly Excites Anorexigenic Proopiomelanocortin Neurons but Inhibits Orexigenic Neuropeptide Y Cells by an Indirect Synaptic Mechanism , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  E. Brenner,et al.  Posture of the arm when grasping spheres to place them elsewhere , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[50]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Advance planning in sequential pick-and-place tasks. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[51]  Christine L. MacKenzie,et al.  The Grasping Hand , 2011, The Grasping Hand.

[52]  Marco Santello,et al.  The effects of task and content on digit placement on a bottle , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.