License extensions for clean-record drivers: A 4-year follow-up

Abstract Over 4,000,000 of California's 17,000,000 licensed drivers used to come to the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) annually to take written and vision tests in order to renew their driver licenses. In an effort to increase public convenience and reduce costs, extension of the license by mail was implemented for selected groups of drivers with clean records over the life of their previous licenses. Continued implementation of the program was subject to evaluation of its effect on traffic safety. Since clean-record drivers make up about 50% of the renewal population, this program made it possible for some 2,000,000 drivers annually to avoid coming to the DMV for license renewal. Two studies of program safety effects were conducted, one evaluating a 2-year extension (760,000 subjects), and the other a 4-year extension (407,000 subjects). Random assignment to a group offered extension by mail or to a control group undergoing standard renewal testing and procedures was followed by careful tracking of accident and conviction activity. During the 48-month period following mailing of renewal notices or extension offers, the extension group had a slightly higher accident rate than did the in-person renewal group — an increase of 1%, or 13 accidents for every 10,000 extension offers. Although this small increase in accident rate would translate into about 2,500 additional accident involvements per year if applied to the current volume of clean-record drivers eligible for extension, statistical tests of significance indicated that the increase could easily be due to sampling error (p>.10). A supplemental Bayesian analysis resulted in a .24 probability that there was no true increase. The administrative cost savings attributable to the extension program were conservatively estimated to be $3,000,000 per year.

[1]  Richard L. Edwards,et al.  An experimental evaluation of driver license manuals and written tests , 1982 .

[2]  D M Harrington,et al.  THE EFFECTIVENESS OF AN AT-HOME DRIVERS LICENSING LAW TEST , 1978 .

[3]  J Grandy,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE RENEWAL RULES TESTS AND THE ACCIDENT AND VIOLATION HISTORIES , 1974 .

[4]  A Burg,et al.  Vision and Driving: A Report on Research , 1971 .

[5]  Shara Lynn Kelsey,et al.  Driver license renewal by mail in California , 1983 .

[6]  Selby H Evans,et al.  Misuse of analysis of covariance when treatment effect and covariate are confounded. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  Robert L. Winkler,et al.  An Introduction to Bayesian Inference and Decision , 1972 .

[8]  A Crancer,et al.  Licensing examinations and their relation to subsequent driving record , 1971 .

[9]  J E Overall,et al.  The significance of treatment effects across several independent studies. , 1981, Journal of psychiatric research.

[10]  Barbara Moyer Faigin,et al.  1975 Societal Costs of Motor Vehicle Accidents , 1976 .

[11]  C B Stoke THE SHORT-TERM EFFECTIVENESS OF WRITTEN DRIVER KNOWLEDGE TESTS , 1978 .

[12]  M K Janke,et al.  Traffic safety impact of the extension of driver licenses by mail for renewal applicants with clean prior driving records , 1981 .

[13]  P F Waller,et al.  THE NORTH CAROLINA TEST WAIVER LAW: AN EVALUATION OF ITS IMPACT , 1977 .

[14]  R. M. Harano,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF CALIFORNIA'S "GOOD DRIVER" INCENTIVE PROGRAM , 1974 .

[15]  W. J. Dixon,et al.  BMDP-77, Biomedical Computer Programs, P-Series , 1979 .

[16]  Mary K. Janke,et al.  ACCIDENT RATES OF DRIVERS WITH BIOPTIC TELESCOPIC LENSES , 1983 .

[17]  C. Johnson,et al.  Incidence of visual field loss in 20,000 eyes and its relationship to driving performance. , 1983, Archives of ophthalmology.

[18]  R. R. Hocking,et al.  Methods of Analysis of Linear Models with Unbalanced Data , 1978 .

[19]  D Kadell,et al.  POST LICENSING CONTROL REPORTING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM: NEGLIGENT OPERATOR PROGRAM COSTS AND EFFECTIVENESS , 1977 .