Clustering and Mixing Times for Segregation Models on ℤ2

The Schelling segregation model attempts to explain possible causes of racial segregation in cities. Schelling considered residents of two types, where everyone prefers that the majority of his or her neighbors are of the same type. He showed through simulations that even mild preferences of this type can lead to segregation if residents move whenever they are not happy with their local environments. We generalize the Schelling model to include a broad class of bias functions determining individuals happiness or desire to move, called the General Influence Model. We show that for any influence function in this class, the dynamics will be rapidly mixing and cities will be integrated (i.e., there will not be clustering) if the racial bias is sufficiently low. Next we show complementary results for two broad classes of influence functions: Increasing Bias Functions (IBF), where an individual's likelihood of moving increases each time someone of the same color leaves (this does not include Schelling's threshold models), and Threshold Bias Functions (TBF) with the threshold exceeding one half, reminiscent of the model Schelling originally proposed. For both classes (IBF and TBF), we show that when the bias is sufficiently high, the dynamics take exponential time to mix and we will have segregation and a large "ghetto" will form.

[1]  Dana Randall,et al.  Sampling spin configurations of an Ising system , 1999, SODA '99.

[2]  George Barmpalias,et al.  Digital morphogenesis via Schelling segregation , 2013, 2014 IEEE 55th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[3]  Dana Randall,et al.  Convergence rates of Markov chains for some self-assembly and non-saturated Ising models , 2009, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[4]  Alistair Sinclair,et al.  Algorithms for Random Generation and Counting: A Markov Chain Approach , 1993, Progress in Theoretical Computer Science.

[5]  Dana Randall,et al.  Sampling biased lattice configurations using exponential metrics , 2009, SODA.

[6]  D. Stauffer,et al.  Ising, Schelling and self-organising segregation , 2007, physics/0701051.

[7]  Sylvain Barde Back to the future: a simple solution to schelling segregation , 2011 .

[8]  Junfu Zhang,et al.  A DYNAMIC MODEL OF RESIDENTIAL SEGREGATION , 2004 .

[9]  Carsten Schneider,et al.  Computing the complexity for Schelling segregation models , 2008 .

[10]  Allan Sly,et al.  Critical Ising on the Square Lattice Mixes in Polynomial Time , 2010, 1001.1613.

[11]  Errico Presutti,et al.  Scaling Limits in Statistical Mechanics and Microstructures in Continuum Mechanics , 2008 .

[12]  L. Chayes Mean Field Analysis of Low–Dimensional Systems , 2009 .

[13]  Martin E. Dyer,et al.  Faster random generation of linear extensions , 1999, SODA '98.

[14]  Sebastian Grauwin,et al.  Dynamic Models of Residential Ségrégation: An Analytical Solution , 2010 .

[15]  Wolff,et al.  Collective Monte Carlo updating for spin systems. , 1989, Physical review letters.

[16]  Dana Randall,et al.  Clustering in Interfering Binary Mixtures , 2011, APPROX-RANDOM.

[17]  Mark Jerrum,et al.  Polynomial-Time Approximation Algorithms for the Ising Model , 1990, SIAM J. Comput..

[18]  Dana Randall,et al.  Slow mixing of glauber dynamics via topological obstructions , 2006, SODA '06.

[19]  A. Kirman,et al.  A physical analogue of the Schelling model , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  H. Peyton Young,et al.  Individual Strategy and Social Structure , 2020 .

[21]  Mark Jerrum,et al.  Approximate Counting, Uniform Generation and Rapidly Mixing Markov Chains , 1987, International Workshop on Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science.

[22]  Mark Jerrum,et al.  Approximate Counting, Uniform Generation and Rapidly Mixing Markov Chains , 1987, WG.

[23]  Tim Rogers,et al.  A unified framework for Schelling’s model of segregation , 2011, ArXiv.

[24]  H. Young,et al.  Individual Strategy and Social Structure: An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions , 1999 .

[25]  Wang,et al.  Nonuniversal critical dynamics in Monte Carlo simulations. , 1987, Physical review letters.

[26]  Nicholas Crawford,et al.  Mean-Field Driven First-Order Phase Transitions in Systems with Long-Range Interactions , 2005, math-ph/0501067.

[27]  V. Climenhaga Markov chains and mixing times , 2013 .

[28]  Nicole Immorlica,et al.  An analysis of one-dimensional schelling segregation , 2012, STOC '12.

[29]  Marek Biskup,et al.  Rigorous Analysis of Discontinuous Phase Transitions via Mean-Field Bounds , 2003 .

[30]  P. Flajolet On approximate counting , 1982 .

[31]  S. Grauwin,et al.  Dynamic Models of Residential Segregation: Brief Review - Analytical Resolution and Study of the Introduction of Coordination , 2009, 0907.1777.

[32]  Thomas C. Schelling,et al.  Dynamic models of segregation , 1971 .

[33]  D. Stauffer Social applications of two-dimensional Ising models , 2007, 0706.3983.