Storage as a Metric of Catchment Comparison

The volume of water stored within a catchment, and its partitioning among groundwater, soil moisture, snowpack, vegetation, and surface water are the variables that ultimately characterize the state of the hydrologic system. Accordingly, storage may provide useful metrics for catchment comparison. Unfortunately, measuring and predicting the amount of water present in a catchment is seldom done; tracking the dynamics of these stores is even rarer. Storage moderates fluxes and exerts critical controls on a wide range of hydrologic and biologic functions of a catchment. While understanding runoff generation and other processes by which catchments release water will always be central to hydrologic science, it is equally essential to understand how catchments retain water. We have initiated a catchment comparison exercise to begin assessing the value of viewing catchments from the storage perspective. The exercise is based on existing data from five watersheds, no common experimental design, and no integrated modelling efforts. Rather, storage was estimated independently for each site. This briefing presents some initial results of the exercise, poses questions about the definitions and importance of storage and the storage perspective, and suggests future directions for ongoing activities. Copyright. (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  R. Woods,et al.  Catchment Classification and Hydrologic Similarity , 2006, Geography Compass.

[2]  P. Bacon,et al.  Inferring groundwater influences on surface water in montane catchments from hydrochemical surveys of springs and streamwaters , 2007 .

[3]  David G. Chandler,et al.  Controls on the temporal and spatial variability of soil moisture in a mountainous landscape: the signature of snow and complex terrain , 2008 .

[4]  J. Orwin,et al.  Short‐term spatial and temporal patterns of suspended sediment transfer in proglacial channels, small River Glacier, Canada , 2004 .

[5]  J. Kirchner.  Getting the right answers for the right reasons: Linking measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology , 2006 .

[6]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  Regionalization of transit time estimates in montane catchments by integrating landscape controls , 2009 .

[7]  J. Olden,et al.  Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes , 2003 .

[8]  Todd E. Dawson,et al.  Determining water use by trees and forests from isotopic, energy balance and transpiration analyses: the roles of tree size and hydraulic lift. , 1996, Tree physiology.

[9]  Julia A. Jones,et al.  Hydrologic regimes of forested, mountainous, headwater basins in New Hampshire, North Carolina, Oregon, and Puerto Rico , 2001 .

[10]  James P. McNamara,et al.  Spatial variation and temporal stability of soil water in a snow‐dominated, mountain catchment , 2004 .

[11]  J. Olden,et al.  Placing global stream flow variability in geographic and geomorphic contexts , 2006 .

[12]  Jim E Freer,et al.  Hydrological Dynamics of the Panola Mountain Research Watershed, Georgia , 2003 .

[13]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  Assessing the value of high‐resolution isotope tracer data in the stepwise development of a lumped conceptual rainfall–runoff model , 2010 .

[14]  Louise J. Bracken,et al.  The concept of hydrological connectivity and its contribution to understanding runoff‐dominated geomorphic systems , 2007 .

[15]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Root water uptake and transport: using physiological processes in global predictions. , 2000, Trends in plant science.

[16]  D. Hannah,et al.  Hydrological influences on hyporheic water quality: implications for salmon egg survival , 2004 .

[17]  R. Harriman,et al.  Hydrogeochemistry of shallow groundwater in an upland Scottish catchment , 1998 .

[18]  Christopher Spence,et al.  A Paradigm Shift in Hydrology: Storage Thresholds Across Scales Influence Catchment Runoff Generation , 2010 .

[19]  J. Kirchner.  Catchments as simple dynamical systems: Catchment characterization, rainfall‐runoff modeling, and doing hydrology backward , 2009 .

[20]  J. McDonnell,et al.  A review and evaluation of catchment transit time modeling , 2006 .

[21]  M. Tani.  Runoff generation processes estimated from hydrological observations on a steep forested hillslope with a thin soil layer , 1997 .

[22]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  Towards a simple dynamic process conceptualization in rainfall–runoff models using multi-criteria calibration and tracers in temperate, upland catchments , 2009 .

[23]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  Gamma distribution models for transit time estimation in catchments: Physical interpretation of parameters and implications for time‐variant transit time assessment , 2010 .

[24]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  How does landscape structure influence catchment transit time across different geomorphic provinces? , 2009 .

[25]  S. Noguchi,et al.  Rainfall-runoff responses and roles of soil moisture variations to the response in tropical rain forest, bukit tarek, peninsular Malaysia , 1997, Journal of Forest Research.

[26]  James B. Domingo,et al.  A spatially distributed energy balance snowmelt model for application in mountain basins , 1999 .

[27]  David G. Chandler,et al.  Soil moisture states, lateral flow, and streamflow generation in a semi‐arid, snowmelt‐driven catchment , 2005 .

[28]  M. Hrachowitz,et al.  Tracers and transit times: windows for viewing catchment scale storage? , 2009 .

[29]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Ecohydrologic separation of water between trees and streams in a Mediterranean climate , 2010 .

[30]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 1. A 147‐storm analysis of the Panola hillslope , 2006 .

[31]  Christopher Spence,et al.  On the relation between dynamic storage and runoff: A discussion on thresholds, efficiency, and function , 2007 .

[32]  H. Wittenberg.  Baseflow recession and recharge as nonlinear storage processes , 1999 .

[33]  Andrew W. Western,et al.  The Tarrawarra Data Set: Soil moisture patterns, soil characteristics, and hydrological flux measurements , 1998 .

[34]  Erwin Zehe,et al.  Patterns of predictability in hydrological threshold systems , 2007 .

[35]  J. E. Nash,et al.  The form of the instantaneous unit hydrograph , 1957 .

[36]  James P. McNamara,et al.  Simulated soil water storage effects on streamflow generation in a mountainous snowmelt environment, Idaho, USA , 2009 .

[37]  M. Robinson.  Methods of hydrological basin comparison , 1994 .

[38]  Kevin Bishop,et al.  Transit Times for Water in a Small Till Catchment from a Step Shift in the Oxygen 18 Content of the Water Input , 1996 .

[39]  E. W. Lane,et al.  Stream Flow Variability , 1950 .

[40]  Richard P. Hooper,et al.  Moving beyond heterogeneity and process complexity: A new vision for watershed hydrology , 2007 .

[41]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  Inter‐comparison of hydro‐climatic regimes across northern catchments: synchronicity, resistance and resilience , 2010 .