A study of friending willingness on SNSs: Secondary school teachers' perspectives

This study examines the self-reported decision making behaviors of 435 Taiwanese in-service secondary school teachers' regarding their willingness to accept friend requests on social network sites (SNSs) from different requesters (e.g., students with acquaintanceships of various durations, unknown/in-class/homeroom students and teaching colleagues with or without administrative roles). The study found that teachers made different friending decisions based on gender and on the identity of the requester but found no difference in teachers' basic roles. That is, male teachers reported greater willingness to friend unknown students, in-class students and administrative colleagues than did female teachers. Overall, non-administrative colleagues were the most acceptable, whereas unknown students were the most unfavorable requesters.The study also revealed that teachers' friending willingness varies with the joint effects of privacy concerns and relational (social intimacy, ethical concerns) and behavioral (Facebook use and protective behaviors) factors. A privacy paradox exists in teachers' willingness to friend homeroom students and non-administrative colleagues. Teachers have privacy concerns related to all five types of requesters, but they report fewer privacy concerns and more ethical concerns and social intimacy when friending in-class and homeroom students. However, these teachers employ privacy protection practices only when friending unknown and in-class students and administrative colleagues. When friending colleagues, intensive Facebook use was found to be the strongest predictor of teachers' friending willingness. The implications of these findings and suggestions for future research are discussed. Teachers' friending/unfriending willingness on Facebook are investigated.Teachers show willingness to friend students and colleagues.Intimacy and ethical concerns are influential in friending students.Privacy and FB use predict the friending of students with weak ties.FB use and privacy protection, but not intimacy, contribute to friending administrative colleagues.

[1]  Chiung-Wen Hsu,et al.  The Closer the Relationship, the More the Interaction on Facebook? Investigating the Case of Taiwan Users , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[2]  Joshua Fogel,et al.  Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  K. Mathieson,et al.  Comparison of Student and Instructor Perceptions of Social Presence. , 2014 .

[4]  Lora B. Helvie-Mason,et al.  Facebook, “Friending,” and Faculty–Student Communication , 2011 .

[5]  Pavica Sheldon.  Examining Gender Differences in Self-disclosure on Facebook Versus Face-to-Face , 2013 .

[6]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[7]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Finding a Measure of Trust@@@Trust in Schools: A Core Resource for Improvement , 2004 .

[8]  Michael Hennessy,et al.  Internet privacy and institutional trust , 2007, New Media Soc..

[9]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[10]  Elena Kolesnikova,et al.  "It Won't Happen To Me!": Self-Disclosure in Online Social Networks , 2009, AMCIS.

[11]  Eden Litt,et al.  Understanding social network site users' privacy tool use , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  S. Petronio.  Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure , 2002 .

[13]  Jennifer Marmo,et al.  The rules of Facebook friendship , 2012 .

[14]  S. Desmarais,et al.  Hey Mom, What’s on Your Facebook? Comparing Facebook Disclosure and Privacy in Adolescents and Adults , 2012 .

[15]  K. Poels,et al.  Older and Wiser? Facebook Use, Privacy Concern, and Privacy Protection in the Life Stages of Emerging, Young, and Middle Adulthood , 2015 .

[16]  Namkee Park,et al.  Effects of self-disclosure on relational intimacy in Facebook , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  Katherine A. Karl,et al.  A Facebook ‘friend’ request from the boss: Too close for comfort? , 2013 .

[18]  Arnon Hershkovitz,et al.  Student-teacher relationship in the Facebook era: the student perspective , 2013 .

[19]  N. M. Meara,et al.  Ethics and the professional practice of psychologists: the role of virtues and principles. , 1990, Professional psychology, research and practice.

[20]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Social Network Sites: Users and Uses , 2009, Adv. Comput..

[21]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Cultivating Social Resources on Social Network Sites: Facebook Relationship Maintenance Behaviors and Their Role in Social Capital Processes , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[22]  Katherine A. Karl,et al.  “Friending” Professors, Parents and Bosses: A Facebook Connection Conundrum , 2011 .

[23]  R. Arteaga Sánchez,et al.  Students' perceptions of Facebook for academic purposes , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[24]  Yasemin Koçak Usluel,et al.  Modeling educational usage of Facebook , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[25]  R. S. Miller,et al.  The assessment of social intimacy. , 1982, Journal of personality assessment.

[26]  Janis Bucholtz,et al.  Diffused Intimacy: Trust and Self-Disclosure in Online Relationship , 2013 .

[27]  Keith E. Howard,et al.  Using Facebook and Other SNSs in K-12 Classrooms: Ethical Considerations for Safe Social Networking , 2013 .

[28]  R. Hartshorne,et al.  Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests , 2008, Internet High. Educ..

[29]  Anabel Quan-Haase,et al.  PRIVACY PROTECTION STRATEGIES ON FACEBOOK , 2013 .

[30]  Stefano Taddei,et al.  Privacy, trust and control: Which relationships with online self-disclosure? , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  I. Altman,et al.  Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships , 1973 .

[32]  Christa S. C. Asterhan,et al.  The promise, reality and dilemmas of secondary school teacher-student interactions in Facebook: The teacher perspective , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[33]  Nicholas Christakis,et al.  The Taste for Privacy: An Analysis of College Student Privacy Settings in an Online Social Network , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[34]  Jeffrey T. Child,et al.  Blogging, communication, and privacy management: Development of the Blogging Privacy Management Measure , 2009 .

[35]  Soner Yıldırım,et al.  Teachers’ Facebook use: their use habits, intensity, self-disclosure, privacy settings, and activities on Facebook , 2014 .

[36]  Melissa S. Plew.  Facebook friendships between college/university instructors and students: Deciding whether or not to allow students as friends, communicating with students, and the individual differences that influence instructors' impression management on Facebook , 2011 .

[37]  Michael Szell,et al.  How women organize social networks different from men , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[38]  Jeffrey T. Child,et al.  Friend or not to friend: Coworker Facebook friend requests as an application of communication privacy management theory , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[39]  Hyejin Park,et al.  Why do people share their context information on Social Network Services? A qualitative study and an experimental study on users' behavior of balancing perceived benefit and risk , 2013, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[40]  M. Roblyer,et al.  Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[41]  Yuan Li,et al.  Theories in online information privacy research: A critical review and an integrated framework , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[42]  Lindsay T. Graham,et al.  A Review of Facebook Research in the Social Sciences , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.