Predictive model development for adsorption of aromatic contaminants by multi-walled carbon nanotubes.

In the present study, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) and Linear Solvation Energy Relationship (LSER) techniques were used to develop predictive models for adsorption of organic contaminants by multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). Adsorption data for 29 aromatic compounds from literature (i.e., the training data) including some of the experimental results obtained in our laboratory were used to develop predictive models with multiple linear regression analysis. The generated QSAR (r(2) = 0.88), and LSER (r(2) = 0.83) equations were validated externally using an independent validation data set of 30 aromatic compounds. External validation accuracies indicated the success of parameter selection, data fitting ability, and the prediction strength of the developed models. Finally, the combination of training and validation data were used to obtain a combined LSER equation (r(2) = 0.83) that would be used for predicting adsorption of a wide range of low molecular weight aromatics by MWCNTs. In addition, LSER models at different concentrations were generated, and LSER parameter coefficients were examined to gain insights to the predominant adsorption interactions of low molecular weight aromatics on MWCNTs. The molecular volume term (V) of the LSER model was the most influential descriptor controlling adsorption at all concentrations. At higher equilibrium concentrations, hydrogen bond donating (A) and hydrogen bond accepting (B) terms became significant in the models. The results demonstrate that successful predictive models can be developed for the adsorption of organic compounds by CNTs using QSAR and LSER techniques.

[1]  Wei Chen,et al.  Adsorption of polar and nonpolar organic chemicals to carbon nanotubes. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  T. Karanfil,et al.  The impacts of aggregation and surface chemistry of carbon nanotubes on the adsorption of synthetic organic compounds. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Kun Yang,et al.  Adsorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by carbon nanomaterials. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Chungsying Lu,et al.  Adsorption thermodynamic and kinetic studies of trihalomethanes on multiwalled carbon nanotubes. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[5]  J. Pignatello,et al.  Adsorption of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol by multi-walled carbon nanotubes as affected by Cu(II). , 2009, Water research.

[6]  T. Karanfil,et al.  Adsorption of aromatic compounds by carbonaceous adsorbents: a comparative study on granular activated carbon, activated carbon fiber, and carbon nanotubes. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  R. Taft,et al.  Linear solvation energy relationships. 33. An analysis of the factors that influence adsorption of organic compounds on activated carbon , 1985 .

[8]  Kun Yang,et al.  Aqueous adsorption of aniline, phenol, and their substitutes by multi-walled carbon nanotubes. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  P. Gschwend,et al.  Evaluating activated carbon-water sorption coefficients of organic compounds using a linear solvation energy relationship approach and sorbate chemical activities. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  G. Owens,et al.  Kinetics and thermodynamics of sorption of nitroaromatic compounds to as-grown and oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes. , 2009, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[11]  James P. Hickey,et al.  Linear solvation energy relationships: "rule of thumb" for estimation of variable values , 1991 .

[12]  R. T. Yang,et al.  Carbon nanotubes as superior sorbent for dioxin removal. , 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[13]  T. Karanfil,et al.  Impact of carbon nanotube morphology on phenanthrene adsorption , 2012, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[14]  D. Lin,et al.  Adsorption of phenolic compounds by carbon nanotubes: role of aromaticity and substitution of hydroxyl groups. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Jim E Riviere,et al.  An index for characterization of nanomaterials in biological systems. , 2010, Nature nanotechnology.

[16]  Baoshan Xing,et al.  Adsorption and desorption of oxytetracycline and carbamazepine by multiwalled carbon nanotubes. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  W. P. Ball,et al.  Influence of surface oxides on the adsorption of naphthalene onto multiwalled carbon nanotubes. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  Wei Chen,et al.  Mechanisms for strong adsorption of tetracycline to carbon nanotubes: a comparative study using activated carbon and graphite as adsorbents. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  T. Karanfil,et al.  Role of Granular Activated Carbon Surface Chemistry on the Adsorption of Organic Compounds. 1. Priority Pollutants , 1999 .

[20]  M. Biesaga,et al.  Sorption behavior of acidic herbicides on carbon nanotubes , 2007 .

[21]  J. Drewes,et al.  Quantitative structure property relationships for the adsorption of pharmaceuticals onto activated carbon. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[22]  P. Cloirec,et al.  QSAR for organics adsorption onto activated carbon in water: what about the use of neural networks? , 1999 .

[23]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[24]  S. Tao,et al.  Sorption and competition of aromatic compounds and humic acid on multiwalled carbon nanotubes. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  I. Suffet,et al.  Quantitative structure-activity relationship using molecular connectivity for the activated carbon adsorption of organic chemicals in water , 1994 .

[26]  T. Karanfil,et al.  Adsorption of synthetic organic chemicals by carbon nanotubes: Effects of background solution chemistry. , 2010, Water research.

[27]  Tony N. Rogers,et al.  Linear Solvation Energy Relationship of the Limiting Partition Coefficient of Organic Solutes between Water and Activated Carbon , 1996 .