Qualitative Spatial Representation for Information Retrieval by Gazetteers

Intelligent and efficient information retrieval becomes increasingly important. Analogous to thesauri in the realm of spatial concepts, gazetteers offer a controlled vocabulary that can be used for spatial queries. Gazetteers use geographic footprints to link place names to geographic locations. Which geographic footprint representation is chosen has a strong impact on the quality of spatial queries. However, the footprint representations currently used in standard gazetteers such as points, lines, grid cell representations, and bounding boxes do not offer enough topological information to support refined spatial queries. We propose a new type of spatial footprint that can be described as a qualitative representation of the spatial decomposition of geographic entities. It holds enough topological and ordinal information enable refined spatial queries without being subject to the constraints of exact polygon representations. The proposed spatial representation was developed to be combined with terminological reasoning techniques used in systems for intelligent information integration.

[1]  Anthony G. Cohn,et al.  A Spatial Logic based on Regions and Connection , 1992, KR.

[2]  Linda L. Hill,et al.  Core Elements of Digital Gazetteers: Placenames, Categories, and Footprints , 2000, ECDL.

[3]  Gio Wiederhold,et al.  Mediators in the architecture of future information systems , 1992, Computer.

[4]  Anthony G. Cohn,et al.  Qualitative Spatial Representation and Reasoning Techniques , 1997, KI.

[5]  Jeff Heflin,et al.  Semantic Interoperability on the Web , 2000 .

[6]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  The KRAFT architecture for knowledge fusion and transformation , 2000, Knowl. Based Syst..

[7]  Ian Horrocks FaCT and iFaCT , 1999, Description Logics.

[8]  Christoph Schlieder Diagrammatic Transformation Processes on Two-dimensional Relational Maps , 1998, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[9]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  Formalizing Regions in the Spatial Semantic Hierarchy: An AH-Graphs Implementation Approach , 1999, COSIT.

[10]  Heiner Stuckenschmidt,et al.  Enabling Technologies for Interoperability , 2000 .

[11]  Vipul Kashyap,et al.  Observer: an approach for query processing in global information systems based on interoperation across pre-existing ontologies , 1996, Proceedings First IFCIS International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems.

[12]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  Building Ontologies at the Knowledge Level using the Ontology Design Environment , 1998 .

[13]  Max J. Egenhofer,et al.  Reasoning about Binary Topological Relations , 1991, SSD.

[14]  Heiner Stuckenschmidt,et al.  Context Modeling and Transformation for Semantic Interoperability , 2000, KRDB.

[15]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Digital Gazetteer Information Exchange (DGIE) , 1999 .

[16]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  Using Hierarchical Spatial Data Structures for Hierarchical Spatial Reasoning , 1997, COSIT.

[17]  James Frew,et al.  Geographic Names: The Implementation of a Gazetteer in a Georeferenced Digital Library , 1999, D Lib Mag..