Whenmostpeoplethinkofqualityim-provement, they immediately think ofpreventing mistakes. Although a corecomponent of a quality program is pa-tientsafetyandpreventingunnecessaryharm,qualityhasabroadergoalofcon-sistently delivering optimal outcomes.Consider an emergent pelvic ultra-sound examination ordered for acutepelvicpaininafemalepatient.Thepa-tient is rapidly brought to the ultra-sound department. The technologistdeftlyperformstheexamination,trans-fers the images, and alerts the radiolo-gist on cue. A diagnosis of ovariantorsionismadeimmediately,thegyne-cologist and operating room are in-formed, and the patient is transferreddirectlytotheoperatingroomfortreat-ment. We often store star-aligningmemories such as these, where com-munication and coordination are or-chestrated perfectly, as insulationagainst the daily delays and frustra-tions we too often encounter. Theheart of quality is striving to makethese scenarios the norm, not theexception.When looking for a quality proj-ect to conduct as part of the ABR’sMaintenance of Certification re-quirements, it is necessary tobroaden your definition of qualityto include the concept of waste.The Toyota Production System,which became known as “Lean,” de-veloped a highly successful qualityimprovement methodology with itsprincipal goal of reducing waste. Themantra of Lean involves “preservingvaluewhile reducingwork”byiden-tifying non–value-added steps [1].Toyota identified and classified 8specific types of waste that consti-tuteareasforprocessimprovement.Although Lean was conceived in amanufacturing environment, theconcepthasbeentranslatedintothehealth care service sector withpromising results [2]. We have“translated” this concept for radiol-ogy, with relevant examples in eachcategory.
[1]
Radiation safety: have we let the public down?
,
2010,
Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.
[2]
R. Wears,et al.
Computer technology and clinical work: still waiting for Godot.
,
2005,
JAMA.
[3]
M. O’Connor,et al.
Quality initiatives: improving patient flow for a bone densitometry practice: results from a Mayo Clinic radiology quality initiative.
,
2010,
Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
[4]
D. Nunez,et al.
Dedicated CT scanner in an emergency department: quantification of factors that contribute to lack of use.
,
2002,
AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[5]
C. Wittram,et al.
The indeterminate CT pulmonary angiogram: imaging characteristics and patient clinical outcome.
,
2005,
Radiology.
[6]
J. S. Pekala,et al.
Optimal thoracic and lumbar spine imaging for trauma: are thoracic and lumbar spine reformats always indicated?
,
2010,
The Journal of trauma.
[7]
S. Swensen,et al.
Radiologic quality and safety: mapping value into radiology.
,
2005,
Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.
[8]
T. Vehmas.
Hawthorne effect: shortening of fluoroscopy times during radiation measurement studies.
,
1997,
The British journal of radiology.