Blue-Blood Pig Thorax Model Increases Residents' Confidence in Internal Mammary Dissection

Abstract Background  Preparation of the recipient vessels is a crucial step in autologous breast reconstruction, with limited opportunity for resident training intraoperatively. The Blue-Blood–infused porcine chest wall—a cadaveric pig thorax embedded in a mannequin shell, connected to a saline perfusion system—is a novel, cost-effective ($55) simulator of internal mammary artery (IMA) dissection and anastomosis intended to improve resident's comfort, safety, and expertise with all steps of this procedure. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of the use of this chest wall model on resident's confidence in performing dissection and anastomosis of the IMA, as well as obtain resident's and faculty's perspectives on model realism and utility. Methods  Plastic surgery residents and microsurgery faculty at the University of Wisconsin were invited to participate. One expert microsurgeon led individual training sessions and performed as the microsurgical assistant. Participants anonymously completed surveys prior to and immediately following their training session to assess their change in confidence performing the procedure, as well as their perception of model realism and utility as a formal microsurgical training tool on a five-point scale. Results  Every participant saw improvement in confidence after their training session in a minimum of one of seven key procedural steps identified. Of participants who had experience with this procedure in humans, the majority rated model anatomy and performance of key procedural steps as “very” or “extremely” realistic as compared with humans. 100% of participants believed practice with this model would improve residents' ability to perform this operation in the operating room and 100% of participants would recommend this model be incorporated into the microsurgical training curriculum. Conclusion  The Blue-Blood porcine chest wall simulator increases trainee confidence in performing key steps of IMA dissection and anastomosis and is perceived as valuable to residents and faculty alike.

[1]  Dmitry Zavlin,et al.  Refining the Rib-sparing Approach in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: Keys to Success , 2021, Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery.

[2]  J. Lipa,et al.  Simulating the IMA Recipient Site for DIEP Flap Surgery: A New Model for Dynamic Microsurgery Simulation with Real-Time Respiration and a Pilot Study , 2021, Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery.

[3]  Y. Akelina,et al.  Superiority of living animal models in microsurgical training: beyond technical expertise , 2021, European Journal of Plastic Surgery.

[4]  A. Zhang,et al.  Risk of Pneumothorax With Internal Mammary Vessel Utilization in Autologous Breast Reconstruction. , 2021, Annals of plastic surgery.

[5]  S. Poore,et al.  The Blue-Blood Porcine Chest Wall: A Novel Microsurgery Training Simulator for Internal Mammary Vessel Dissection and Anastomosis , 2020, Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery.

[6]  Matthew J Davis,et al.  Use of Simulation in Plastic Surgery Training , 2020, Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open.

[7]  Carrie K Chu,et al.  Microsurgery Training in Plastic Surgery , 2020, Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open.

[8]  D. Oleynikov,et al.  Effects of Varied Surgical Simulation Training Schedules on Motor-Skill Acquisition , 2020, Surgical innovation.

[9]  S. Poore,et al.  Multispecialty Microsurgical Course Utilizing the Blue-Blood Chicken Thigh Model Significantly Improves Resident Comfort, Confidence, and Attitudes in Multiple Domains , 2019, Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery.

[10]  S. Poore,et al.  “Blue-Blood”- Infused Chicken Thigh Training Model for Microsurgery and Supermicrosurgery , 2018, Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open.

[11]  D. Deschler,et al.  Chicken thigh microvascular training model improves resident surgical skills , 2017, Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology.

[12]  Evgenios Evgeniou,et al.  The Role of Simulation in Microsurgical Training. , 2017, Journal of surgical education.

[13]  A. Estabrook,et al.  Breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A ten-year analysis of trends and immediate postoperative outcomes. , 2017, Breast.

[14]  Samuel J. Lin,et al.  The Evolution of Surgical Simulation: The Current State and Future Avenues for Plastic Surgery Education , 2017, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[15]  Stelios C. Wilson,et al.  To Resect or Not to Resect: The Effects of Rib-Sparing Harvest of the Internal Mammary Vessels in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction , 2015, Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery.

[16]  Danielle O. Dumestre,et al.  Evidence-based microsurgical skill-acquisition series part 1: validated microsurgical models--a systematic review. , 2014, Journal of surgical education.

[17]  Young Seok Kim,et al.  Evaluation of the Efficacy of Microsurgical Practice Through Time Factor Added Protocol: Microsurgical Training Using Nonvital Material , 2010, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[18]  P. Pronovost,et al.  Beyond “see one, do one, teach one”: toward a different training paradigm , 2009, Quality & Safety in Health Care.

[19]  F. Castagnetti,et al.  Bilateral breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps: 4 years' experience. , 2008, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[20]  Bernard T. Lee,et al.  The Rib-Sparing Technique for Internal Mammary Vessel Exposure in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction , 2008, Annals of plastic surgery.

[21]  Elspeth M McDougall,et al.  Validation of surgical simulators. , 2007, Journal of endourology.

[22]  J. Hunt,et al.  A 10-Year Retrospective Review of 758 DIEP Flaps for Breast Reconstruction , 2004, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[23]  J. Serletti,et al.  An Outcome Analysis Comparing the Thoracodorsal and Internal Mammary Vessels as Recipient Sites for Microvascular Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Study of 100 Patients , 2003, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[24]  J. Serletti,et al.  Microvascular reconstruction of the breast. , 2000, Seminars in surgical oncology.

[25]  R. Allen,et al.  The Internal Mammary Artery and Vein as a Recipient Site for Free‐Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Report of 110 Consecutive Cases , 1996, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[26]  David E. Komatsu,et al.  Microsurgical Simulation Exercise for Surgical Training. , 2016, Journal of surgical education.

[27]  C. Taeger,et al.  [Establishment and Evaluation of a Microsurgery Course for Medical Students]. , 2015, Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Handchirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Mikrochirurgie der Peripheren Nerven und Gefasse : Organ der V....

[28]  N. Ghetu,et al.  Training of microsurgical skills on nonliving models , 2008, Microsurgery.

[29]  P. Matteucci,et al.  Validation of microsurgical models in microsurgery training and competence: A review , 2007, Microsurgery.

[30]  D. Zamfirescu,et al.  Training program and learning curve in experimental microsurgery during the residency in plastic surgery , 2007, Microsurgery.

[31]  N. Lausada,et al.  Use of cryopreserved rat arteries for microsurgical training , 2005, Microsurgery.

[32]  J. Usón-Gargallo,et al.  Interactive advanced‐communication multistation system for microsurgical training , 2004, Microsurgery.

[33]  W. Lineaweaver,et al.  Learning curve of microvascular venous anastomosis: A never ending struggle? , 2000, Microsurgery.