Calibration of stochastic link-based fundamental diagram with explicit consideration of speed heterogeneity

Abstract This study aims to establish a stochastic link-based fundamental diagram (FD) with explicit consideration of two available sources of uncertainty: speed heterogeneity, indicated by the speed variance within an interval, and rainfall intensity. A stochastic structure was proposed to incorporate the speed heterogeneity into the traffic stream model, and the random-parameter structures were applied to reveal the unobserved heterogeneity in the mean speeds at an identical density. The proposed stochastic link-based FD was calibrated and validated using real-world traffic data obtained from two selected road segments in Hong Kong. Traffic data were obtained from the Hong Kong Journey Time Indication System operated by the Hong Kong Transport Department during January 1 to December 31, 2017. The data related to rainfall intensity were obtained from the Hong Kong Observatory. A two-stage calibration based on Bayesian inference was proposed for estimating the stochastic link-based FD parameters. The predictive performances of the proposed model and three other models were compared using K-fold cross-validation. The results suggest that the random-parameter model considering the speed heterogeneity effect performs better in terms of both goodness-of-fit and predictive accuracy. The effect of speed heterogeneity accounts for 18%–24% of the total heterogeneity effects on the variance of FD. In addition, there exists unobserved heterogeneity across the mean speeds at an identical density, and the rainfall intensity negatively affects the mean speed and its effect on the variance of FD differs at different densities.

[1]  M J Lighthill,et al.  On kinematic waves II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads , 1955, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[2]  David S. Hurwitz,et al.  Nonparametric Modeling of Vehicle-Type-Specific Headway Distribution in Freeway Work Zones , 2015 .

[3]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Lane-changing in traffic streams , 2006 .

[4]  Daiheng Ni,et al.  Logistic modeling of the equilibrium speed-density relationship , 2011 .

[5]  S. Washington,et al.  Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis , 2010 .

[6]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  A BEHAVIORAL THEORY OF MULTI-LANE TRAFFIC FLOW. PART I, LONG HOMOGENEOUS FREEWAY SECTIONS , 1999 .

[7]  Louis A. Pipes,et al.  Car following models and the fundamental diagram of road traffic , 1967 .

[8]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Understanding widely scattered traffic flows, the capacity drop, and platoons as effects of variance-driven time gaps. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Li Li,et al.  Vehicle headway modeling and its inferences in macroscopic/microscopic traffic flow theory: A survey , 2017 .

[10]  G. F. Newell Nonlinear Effects in the Dynamics of Car Following , 1961 .

[11]  H. M. Zhang,et al.  A stochastic wave propagation model , 2008 .

[12]  Xiqun Chen,et al.  Characterising scattering features in flow–density plots using a stochastic platoon model , 2014 .

[13]  Amir Ghiasi,et al.  A mixed traffic capacity analysis and lane management model for connected automated vehicles: A Markov chain method , 2017 .

[14]  Zong Tian,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian random intercept model-based cross-level interaction decomposition for truck driver injury severity investigations. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  J. M. D. Castillo,et al.  On the functional form of the speed-density relationship—I: General theory , 1995 .

[16]  X. Qu,et al.  On the Stochastic Fundamental Diagram for Freeway Traffic: Model Development, Analytical Properties, Validation, and Extensive Applications , 2017 .

[17]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Interpreting the wide scattering of synchronized traffic data by time gap statistics. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  Antoine Tordeux,et al.  Adaptive Time Gap Car-Following Model , 2010 .

[19]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[20]  H. Greenberg An Analysis of Traffic Flow , 1959 .

[21]  Joseph L. Schofer,et al.  A STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF SPEED-DENSITY HYPOTHESES , 1965 .

[22]  Shauna L. Hallmark,et al.  Analysis of Occupant Injury Severity in Winter Weather Crashes: A Fully Bayesian Multivariate Approach , 2016 .

[23]  L. C. Edie Car-Following and Steady-State Theory for Noncongested Traffic , 1961 .

[24]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Heterogeneity In Car-Following Behavior: Theory And Empirics , 2011 .

[25]  W. Lam,et al.  Modeling the effects of rainfall intensity on traffic speed, flow, and density relationships for urban roads , 2013 .

[26]  Romuel F. Machado,et al.  Dynamical capacity drop in a nonlinear stochastic traffic model , 2016, 1603.06175.

[27]  Martin Treiber,et al.  Traffic Flow Dynamics , 2013 .

[28]  Pengpeng Xu,et al.  Towards activity-based exposure measures in spatial analysis of pedestrian-motor vehicle crashesThis article was handled by Associate Editor Chris Lee. , 2020, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  L. Craig Davis,et al.  Introduction to Modern Traffic Flow Theory and Control: The Long Road to Three-Phase Traffic Theory , 2009 .

[30]  Michael J. Cassidy,et al.  Some observed details of freeway traffic evolution , 2001 .

[31]  Lai Zheng,et al.  Assessing the explanatory and predictive performance of a random parameters count model with heterogeneity in means and variances. , 2020, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[32]  Ning Wu,et al.  A new approach for modeling of Fundamental Diagrams , 2002 .

[33]  Peter Congdon,et al.  Applied Bayesian Modelling , 2003 .

[34]  Henry X. Liu,et al.  A stochastic model of traffic flow: Gaussian approximation and estimation , 2013 .

[35]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Investigating the Shape of the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram Using Simulation Data , 2010 .

[36]  Adolf D. May,et al.  Traffic Flow Fundamentals , 1989 .

[37]  Jianfeng Zheng,et al.  A probabilistic stationary speed–density relation based on Newell’s simplified car-following model , 2014 .

[38]  Benjamin Coifman,et al.  An Overview of Empirical Flow-Density and Speed-Spacing Relationships: Evidence of Vehicle Length Dependency , 2015 .

[39]  H. M. Zhang,et al.  A Car-Following Theory for Multiphase Vehicular Traffic Flow , 2003 .

[40]  Henry X. Liu,et al.  A stochastic model of traffic flow: Theoretical foundations , 2011 .

[41]  Xinkai Wu,et al.  The Uncertainty of Drivers’ Gap Selection and its Impact on the Fundamental Diagram , 2013 .

[42]  David J. Lunn,et al.  The BUGS Book: A Practical Introduction to Bayesian Analysis , 2013 .

[43]  W. Y. Szeto,et al.  Stochastic cell transmission model (SCTM): A stochastic dynamic traffic model for traffic state surveillance and assignment , 2011 .

[44]  Chen Wu,et al.  Effect of stochastic transition in the fundamental diagram of traffic flow , 2014, 1408.2902.

[45]  B. Kerner The Physics of Traffic: Empirical Freeway Pattern Features, Engineering Applications, and Theory , 2004 .

[46]  Hai-Jun Huang,et al.  A new fundamental diagram theory with the individual difference of the driver’s perception ability , 2012 .

[47]  P. I. Richards Shock Waves on the Highway , 1956 .

[48]  D. Helbing,et al.  LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Macroscopic simulation of widely scattered synchronized traffic states , 1999, cond-mat/9901119.