Business Process Model Similarity as a Proxy for Group Consensus

Consensus is an important measure for the success of any business process modeling effort. Although intensively studied in the general literature on group processes, consensus has hardly been considered in business process modeling and never seriously measured. We define consensus as the level of agreement of group members’ views on the process and introduce business process similarity as a proxy. We validate the measure by comparing it to an existing self-reported measure of consensus.

[1]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  A success model for Business process modeling: Findings from A multiple case study , 2004, PACIS.

[2]  Peter Rittgen Quality and perceived usefulness of process models , 2010, SAC '10.

[3]  Wenhong Luo,et al.  A framework for selecting business process modeling methods , 1999 .

[4]  Norbert Gronau,et al.  The KMDL Knowledge Management Approach: Integrating Knowledge Conversions and Business Process Modeling , 2004, PAKM.

[5]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Investigating the Moderators of the Group Support Systems Use with Meta-Analysis , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Shazia Wasim Sadiq,et al.  A Survey of Comparative Business Process Modeling Approaches , 2007, BIS.

[7]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Effects of Four Modes of Group Communication on the Outcomes of Software Requirements Determination , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Bruce A. Reinig,et al.  Toward an Understanding of Satisfaction with the Process and Outcomes of Teamwork , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Prediction of Business Process Model Quality Based on Structural Metrics , 2010, ER.

[10]  John Krogstie,et al.  Participatory Development of Enterprise Process Models , 2005, Information Modeling Methods and Methodologies.

[11]  Marc Ehrig,et al.  Measuring Similarity between Semantic Business Process Models , 2007, APCCM.

[12]  William A. Wallace,et al.  Visualizing modeling heuristics: an exploratory study , 1999, ICIS.

[13]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness , 1985 .

[14]  Richard L. Priem Top management team group factors, consensus, and firm performance , 1990 .

[15]  B. T. Clegg,et al.  Building a Holarchy Using Business Process-Oriented Holonic (PrOH) Modeling , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[16]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Information exchange and use in GSS and verbal group decision making: effects of minority influence , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[17]  Wineke A. M. van Lent,et al.  Similarity of business process models : metrics and evaluation , 2009 .

[18]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Modeling with a group modeling tool: group support, model quality, and validation , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[19]  Remco M. Dijkman,et al.  Measuring Similarity between Business Process Models , 2008, CAiSE.

[20]  Peter Rittgen Collaborative Modeling: Roles, Activities and Team Organization , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Model. Des..

[21]  Stijn Hoppenbrouwers,et al.  Assessing Collaborative Modeling Quality Based on Modeling Artifacts , 2010, EIS.

[22]  Remco M. Dijkman,et al.  Graph Matching Algorithms for Business Process Model Similarity Search , 2009, BPM.

[23]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Potential pitfalls of process modeling: part A , 2006, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[24]  P. Johnson-Laird The computer and the mind: an introduction to cognitive science , 1988 .

[25]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Facilitation Methods for Collaborative Modeling Tools , 2000 .

[26]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Business Process Modeling- A Comparative Analysis , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Remco M. Dijkman,et al.  Aligning Business Process Models , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference.

[28]  Daniel L. Moody,et al.  Evaluating the quality of information models: empirical testing of a conceptual model quality framework , 2003, 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings..

[29]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Breaking the rules: success and failure in groupware-supported business process reengineering , 2003, Decis. Support Syst..

[30]  Remco M. Dijkman Diagnosing Differences between Business Process Models , 2008, BPM.

[31]  Sascha Ossowski,et al.  Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC), Sierre, Switzerland, March 22-26, 2010 , 2010, SAC.

[32]  Randy Hirokawa,et al.  Small Group Consensus , 1988 .

[33]  Peretz Shoval,et al.  Conceptual Modeling - ER 2010, 29th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, Vancouver, BC, Canada, November 1-4, 2010. Proceedings , 2010, ER.

[34]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Structuring Time and Task in Electronic Brainstorming , 1999, MIS Q..

[35]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Media and Group Cohesion: Relative Influences on Social Presence, Task Participation, and Group Consensus , 2001, MIS Q..

[36]  P Kumarapeli,et al.  Using Unified Modelling Language (UML) as a process-modelling technique for clinical-research process improvement , 2007, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[37]  Keng Siau,et al.  Information Modeling Methods and Methodologies , 2005, Advanced topics in database research.

[38]  Peter Rittgen,et al.  Negotiating Models , 2007, CAiSE.

[39]  Angi Voß,et al.  eParticipative Process Learning - process-oriented experience management and conflict solving , 2005, Data Knowl. Eng..

[40]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Extending the Discussion of Model Quality: Why Clarity and Completeness may not always be enough , 2007, EMMSAD.

[41]  William R. King,et al.  Association for Information Systems (AIS) , 2010 .

[42]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Information Is What You Make of It: The Influence of Group History and Computer Support on Information Sharing, Decision Quality, and Member Perceptions , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[43]  S. Green,et al.  The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group process , 1980 .