Estimated Hourly Personal Exposures to Ambient and Nonambient Particulate Matter Among Sensitive Populations in Seattle, Washington

Abstract Epidemiological studies of particulate matter (PM) routinely use concentrations measured with stationary outdoor monitors as surrogates for personal exposure. Despite the frequently reported poor correlations between ambient concentrations and total personal exposure, the epidemiologic associations between ambient concentrations and health effects depend on the correlation between ambient concentrations and personal exposure to ambient-generated PM. This paper separates personal PM exposure into ambient and nonambient components and estimates the outdoor contribution to personal PM exposures with continuous light scattering data collected from 38 subjects in Seattle, WA. Across all subjects, the average exposure encountered indoors at home was lower than in all other microenvironments. Cooking and being at school were associated with elevated levels of exposure. Previously published estimates of particle infiltration (F inf) were combined with time–location data to estimate an ambient contribution fraction (α, mean = 0.66 ± 0.21) for each subject. The mean α was significantly lower for subjects monitored during the heating season (0.55 ± 0.16) than for those monitored during the nonheating season (0.80 ± 0.17). Our modeled α estimates agreed well with those estimated with the sulfur-tracer method (slope = 1.08; R2 = 0.67). We modeled exposure to ambient and nonambient PM with both continuous light scattering and 24-hr gravimetric data and found good agreement between the two methods. On average, ambient particles accounted for 48% of total personal exposure (range = 21–80%). The personal activity exposure was highly influenced by time spent away from monitored microenvironments. The median hourly longitudinal correlation between central site concentrations and personal exposures was 0.30. Although both a and the nonambient sources influence the personal–central relationship, the latter seems to dominate. Thus, total personal exposure may be poorly predicted by stationary outdoor monitors, particularly among persons whose PM exposure is dominated by nonambient exposures, for example, those living in tightly sealed homes, those who cook, and children.

[1]  P. Albert,et al.  Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[2]  P. Koutrakis,et al.  Personal exposures to acid aerosols and ammonia , 1992 .

[3]  W. Wilson,et al.  Fine particles and coarse particles: concentration relationships relevant to epidemiologic studies. , 1997, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[4]  R. Delfino,et al.  Symptoms in pediatric asthmatics and air pollution: differences in effects by symptom severity, anti-inflammatory medication use and particulate averaging time. , 1998, Environmental health perspectives.

[5]  R. Burnett,et al.  Personal Exposure of Adults with Cardiorespiratory Disease to Particulate Acid and Sulfate in Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada , 1998 .

[6]  Stuart R. Lipsitz,et al.  Review of Software to Fit Generalized Estimating Equation Regression Models , 1999 .

[7]  V. Hasselblad,et al.  Assessment of human exposure to ambient particulate matter. , 1999, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[8]  S L Zeger,et al.  Exposure measurement error in time-series studies of air pollution: concepts and consequences. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[9]  P. Koutrakis,et al.  Relationships among personal, indoor, and outdoor fine and coarse particle concentrations for individuals with COPD , 2000, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[10]  Debra Walsh,et al.  Use of a Continuous Nephelometer to Measure Personal Exposure to Particles During the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Baltimore and Fresno Panel Studies , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[11]  Michael T. Kleinman,et al.  Incidence and Apparent Health Significance of Brief Airborne Particle Excursions , 2000 .

[12]  M. Kleinman,et al.  Evaluation of a real-time passive personal particle monitor in fixed site residential indoor and ambient measurements , 2000, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[13]  J. Sarnat,et al.  Assessing the Relationship between Personal Particulate and Gaseous Exposures of Senior Citizens Living in Baltimore, MD , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[14]  Martin Röösli,et al.  Validity of Ambient Levels of Fine Particles as Surrogate for Personal Exposure to Outdoor Air Pollution—Results of the European EXPOLIS-EAS Study (Swiss Center Basel) , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[15]  L. Wallace.  Correlations of Personal Exposure to Particles with Outdoor Air Measurements: A Review of Recent Studies , 2000 .

[16]  M. Brauer,et al.  Exposure of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients to Particulate Matter: Relationships between Personal and Ambient Air Concentrations , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[17]  W. Ott,et al.  Predicting Particulate (PM10) Personal Exposure Distributions Using a Random Component Superposition Statistical Model , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[18]  P. Catalano,et al.  Hourly Personal Exposures to Fine Particles and Gaseous Pollutants—Results from Baltimore, Maryland , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[19]  P J Catalano,et al.  A pilot investigation of the relative toxicity of indoor and outdoor fine particles: in vitro effects of endotoxin and other particulate properties. , 2001, Environmental health perspectives.

[20]  R. Delfino,et al.  Monitoring of 1-min personal particulate matter exposures in relation to voice-recorded time-activity data. , 2001, Environmental research.

[21]  Ronald W. Williams,et al.  The relationships between personal PM exposures for elderly populations and indoor and outdoor concentrations for three retirement center scenarios* , 2001, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[22]  L. L. Piper,et al.  Particulate matter and manganese exposures in Indianapolis, Indiana , 2001, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[23]  M G Apte,et al.  Estimating separately personal exposure to ambient and nonambient particulate matter for epidemiology and risk assessment: why and how. , 2001, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[24]  Ronald W. Williams,et al.  Personal exposures to PM2.5 mass and trace elements in Baltimore, MD, USA , 2001 .

[25]  D. Dockery,et al.  Increased Particulate Air Pollution and the Triggering of Myocardial Infarction , 2001, Circulation.

[26]  C. H. R I S T O P H E,et al.  Using Sulfur as a Tracer of Outdoor Fine Particulate Matter , 2002 .

[27]  Thomas Lumley,et al.  Spatial Characteristics of Fine Particulate Matter: Identifying Representative Monitoring Locations in Seattle, Washington , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[28]  T. Larson,et al.  Comparison of light scattering devices and impactors for particulate measurements in indoor, outdoor, and personal environments. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  Thomas Lumley,et al.  Exposure assessment of particulate matter for susceptible populations in Seattle. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.

[30]  G. O'Connor,et al.  Particle concentrations in inner-city homes of children with asthma: the effect of smoking, cooking, and outdoor pollution. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.

[31]  Jonathan Thornburg,et al.  The Research Triangle Park particulate matter panel study: modeling ambient source contribution to personal and residential PM mass concentrations , 2003 .

[32]  Lianne Sheppard,et al.  Use of real-time light scattering data to estimate the contribution of infiltrated and indoor-generated particles to indoor air. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.